Airborne transmission of foot-and-mouth disease in pigs: evaluation and optimisation of instrumentation and techniques.

Foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) can be transmitted in a variety of ways, one of which is through virus exhaled into the air by infected livestock. It is clear that where there is close contact there will be a range of possible mechanisms for the transmission of disease from animal to animal, including the airborne route if simple barriers between livestock exist. In transmission of FMD over longer distances, airborne transmission represents a significant challenge to the veterinary services in that the mechanism is essentially uncontrollable if the primary source of the disease is not contained. In the event of an epidemic of FMD, such as the one experienced in the United Kingdom in 2001, it is important for disease control purposes to understand the contribution made to the overall spread of disease by aerosolised virus. This assessment is based on a combination of measurements made in the laboratory and through clinical observations in the field. To date, laboratory measurements have used a number of instruments that were not specifically designed for working with FMD virus or whose performance have not been fully compared and documented. This paper compares four samplers and describes the method by which samples are processed. Overall it is concluded that there is no optimum air sampling instrument which could be successfully employed for all situations but the work provides guidance to those wishing to make measurements in the future and establishes a baseline against which any new samplers can be compared.

[1]  C. Hamblin,et al.  A new enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the detection of antibodies against foot-and-mouth disease virus. I. Development and method of ELISA. , 1986, Journal of immunological methods.

[2]  A. Donaldson,et al.  Exposure of sheep to natural aerosols of foot-and-mouth disease virus. , 1986, Research in veterinary science.

[3]  H. Coe,et al.  Foot-and-mouth disease - quantification and size distribution of airborne particles emitted by healthy and infected pigs. , 2007, Veterinary journal.

[4]  S. Alexandersen,et al.  The pathogenesis and diagnosis of foot-and-mouth disease. , 2003, Journal of comparative pathology.

[5]  E O Powell,et al.  A cyclone separator for aerosol sampling in the field , 1969, Journal of Hygiene.

[6]  B. Bang Foot-and-mouth disease , 1912 .

[7]  K. R. May,et al.  Multistage liquid impinger , 1966, Bacteriological reviews.

[8]  S. Reid,et al.  Evaluation of automated RT-PCR to accelerate the laboratory diagnosis of foot-and-mouth disease virus. , 2003, Journal of virological methods.

[9]  S. Alexandersen,et al.  Further studies to quantify the dose of natural aerosols of foot-and-mouth disease virus for pigs , 2002, Epidemiology and Infection.

[10]  A. Mouilleseaux Sampling methods for bioaerosols , 1990 .

[11]  W. Snowdon Growth of Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus in Monolayer Cultures of Calf Thyroid Cells , 1966, Nature.

[12]  S. Alexandersen,et al.  Determinants of early foot-and-mouth disease virus dynamics in pigs. , 2004, Journal of comparative pathology.

[13]  C. Hamblin,et al.  A rapid enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the detection of foot-and-mouth disease virus in epithelial tissues. , 1984, Veterinary microbiology.

[14]  A. Donaldson,et al.  Air sampling of pigs infected with foot-and-mouth disease virus: comparison of Litton and cyclone samplers. , 1982, Research in Veterinary Science.

[15]  A. Donaldson The influence of relative humidity on the aerosol stability of different strains of foot-and-mouth disease virus suspended in saliva. , 1972, The Journal of general virology.

[16]  K. R. May,et al.  The Efficiency of Various Liquid Impinger Samplers in Bacterial Aerosols , 1957, British journal of industrial medicine.

[17]  R. Sellers,et al.  The airborne dispersal of foot-and-mouth disease virus from vaccinated and recovered pigs, cattle and sheep after exposure to infection. , 1977, Research in veterinary science.