Feasibility and efficacy of a robotic device for hand rehabilitation in hemiplegic stroke patients: a randomized pilot controlled study

Objective: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of robot-assisted hand rehabilitation in improving arm function abilities in sub-acute hemiplegic patients. Design: Randomized controlled pilot study. Setting: Inpatient rehabilitation centers. Participants: Thirty hemiplegic stroke patients (Ashworth spasticity index <3) were recruited and randomly divided into a Treatment group (TG) and Control group (CG). Interventions: Patients in the TG received intensive hand training with Gloreha, a hand rehabilitation glove that provides computer-controlled, repetitive, passive mobilization of the fingers, with multisensory feedback. Patients in the CG received the same amount of time in terms of conventional hand rehabilitation. Main outcome measures: Hand motor function (Motricity Index, MI), fine manual dexterity (Nine Hole Peg Test, NHPT) and strength (Grip and Pinch test) were measured at baseline and after rehabilitation, and the differences, (Δ) mean(standard deviation), compared between groups. Results Twenty-seven patients concluded the program: 14 in the TG and 13 in the CG. None of the patients refused the device and only one adverse event of rheumatoid arthritis reactivation was reported. Baseline data did not differ significantly between the two groups. In TG, ΔMI 23(16.4), ΔNHPT 0.16(0.16), ΔGRIP 0.27(0.23) and ΔPINCH 0.07(0.07) were significantly greater than in CG, ΔMI 5.2(9.2), ΔNHPT 0.02(0.07), ΔGRIP 0.03(0.06) and ΔPINCH 0.02(0.03)] (p=0.002, p=0.009, p=0.003 and p=0.038, respectively). Conclusions: Gloreha Professional is feasible and effective in recovering fine manual dexterity and strength and reducing arm disability in sub-acute hemiplegic patients.

[1]  Voss De,et al.  Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation. , 1967 .

[2]  W. Downie,et al.  Studies with pain rating scales. , 1978, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[3]  V. Mathiowetz,et al.  Grip and pinch strength: normative data for adults. , 1985, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[4]  V. Mathiowetz,et al.  Adult norms for the Box and Block Test of manual dexterity. , 1985, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[5]  M L Giudice,et al.  Effects of continuous passive motion and elevation on hand edema. , 1990, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[6]  C. Granger,et al.  Functional assessment scales: a study of persons after stroke. , 1993, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[7]  D. Dirette,et al.  Effects of continuous passive motion on the edematous hands of two persons with flaccid hemiplegia. , 1994, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[8]  Richard W. Bohannon Motricity Index Scores are Valid Indicators of Paretic Upper Extremity Strength Following Stroke , 1999 .

[9]  A Ashburn,et al.  The Bobath concept in stroke rehabilitation: a focus group study of the experienced physiotherapists' perspective , 2000, Disability and rehabilitation.

[10]  G. Kwakkel,et al.  Probability of regaining dexterity in the flaccid upper limb: impact of severity of paresis and time since onset in acute stroke. , 2003, Stroke.

[11]  R. Salter,et al.  Continuous passive motion: from origination to research to clinical applications. , 2004, The Journal of rheumatology.

[12]  James G Wright,et al.  Development of the QuickDASH: comparison of three item-reduction approaches. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[13]  Aaron R. Seitz,et al.  A common framework for perceptual learning , 2007, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[14]  T. Platz,et al.  Electromechanical and robot-assisted arm training for improving arm function and activities of daily living after stroke. , 2008, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[15]  Paul A Thompson,et al.  Retention of upper limb function in stroke survivors who have received constraint-induced movement therapy: the EXCITE randomised trial , 2008, The Lancet Neurology.

[16]  Thomas Platz,et al.  Electromechanical and Robot-Assisted Arm Training for Improving Arm Function and Activities of Daily Living After Stroke , 2009 .

[17]  J. McGuire,et al.  Spastic Hypertonia and Movement Disorders: Pathophysiology, Clinical Presentation, and Quantification , 2009, PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation.

[18]  Rong Song,et al.  A Comparison Between Electromyography-Driven Robot and Passive Motion Device on Wrist Rehabilitation for Chronic Stroke , 2009, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[19]  S. Hesse,et al.  Arm studio to intensify the upper limb rehabilitation after stroke: concept, acceptance, utilization and preliminary clinical results. , 2010, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[20]  Grant D. Huang,et al.  Robot-assisted therapy for long-term upper-limb impairment after stroke. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  Julius Sim,et al.  Hands-on therapy interventions for upper limb motor dysfunction following stroke. , 2011, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[22]  Peter Oster,et al.  Rehabilitation after stroke. , 2011, Deutsches Arzteblatt international.

[23]  Peter Langhorne,et al.  Predictors of upper limb recovery after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2012, Clinical rehabilitation.

[24]  Chang Ho Hwang,et al.  Individual finger synchronized robot-assisted hand rehabilitation in subacute to chronic stroke: a prospective randomized clinical trial of efficacy , 2012, Clinical rehabilitation.

[25]  André J. Szameitat,et al.  Cortical activation during executed, imagined, observed, and passive wrist movements in healthy volunteers and stroke patients , 2012, NeuroImage.

[26]  S. Leonhardt,et al.  A survey on robotic devices for upper limb rehabilitation , 2014, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[27]  Rahsaan J. Holley,et al.  Robotic Approaches for Rehabilitation of Hand Function After Stroke , 2012, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[28]  Giulio Rosati,et al.  On the Role of Auditory Feedback in Robot-Assisted Movement Training after Stroke: Review of the Literature , 2013, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[29]  Amit Sethi,et al.  Effect of intense functional task training upon temporal structure of variability of upper extremity post stroke. , 2013, Journal of hand therapy : official journal of the American Society of Hand Therapists.

[30]  G. Morone,et al.  The value of robotic systems in stroke rehabilitation , 2014, Expert review of medical devices.

[31]  Nicola Smania,et al.  Effects of contralesional robot-assisted hand training in patients with unilateral spatial neglect following stroke: a case series study , 2014, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[32]  Derek G Kamper,et al.  Training finger individuation with a mechatronic-virtual reality system leads to improved fine motor control post-stroke , 2014, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[33]  N. Byl,et al.  Poststroke Upper Limb Recovery , 2014, Seminars in Neurology.

[34]  G. Mead,et al.  Interventions for improving upper limb function after stroke. , 2014, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[35]  Activating the motor system through action observation: is this an efficient approach in adults and children? , 2015, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[36]  Sandra G Brauer,et al.  Dose of arm activity training during acute and subacute rehabilitation post stroke: a systematic review of the literature , 2015, Clinical rehabilitation.

[37]  J. Konczak,et al.  The effectiveness of proprioceptive training for improving motor function: a systematic review , 2015, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[38]  R. Gassert,et al.  Robot-assisted rehabilitation of hand function , 2018 .