Design of an algorithm for the detection of intravenous fluid contamination in clinical laboratory samples

Abstract Objectives Contamination of blood samples from patients receiving intravenous fluids is a common error with potential risk to the patient. Algorithms based on the presence of aberrant results have been described but have the limitation that not all infusion fluids have the same composition. Our objective is to develop an algorithm based on the detection of the dilution observed on the analytes not usually included in infusion fluids. Methods A group of 89 cases was selected from samples flagged as contaminated. Contamination was confirmed by reviewing the clinical history and comparing the results with previous and subsequent samples. A control group with similar characteristics was selected. Eleven common biochemical parameters not usually included in infusion fluids and with low intraindividual variability were selected. The dilution in relation to the immediate previous results was calculated for each analyte and a global indicator, defined as the percentage of analytes with significant dilution, was calculated. ROC curves were used to define the cut-off points. Results A cut-off point of 20 % of dilutional effect requiring also a 60 % dilutional ratio achieved a high specificity (95 % CI 91–98 %) with an adequate sensitivity (64 % CI 54–74 %). The Area Under Curve obtained was 0.867 (95 % CI 0.819–0.915). Conclusions Our algorithm based on the global dilutional effect presents a similar sensitivity but greater specificity than the systems based on alarming results. The implementation of this algorithm in the laboratory information systems may facilitate the automated detection of contaminated samples.

[1]  Yong Duan,et al.  Combined strategy of knowledge‐based rule selection and historical data percentile‐based range determination to improve an autoverification system for clinical chemistry test results , 2022, Journal of clinical laboratory analysis.

[2]  Nanxun Mo,et al.  Development and implementation of an LIS-based validation system for autoverification toward zero defects in the automated reporting of laboratory test results , 2021, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making.

[3]  O. Gulbahar,et al.  A model to establish autoverification in the clinical laboratory. , 2021, Clinical biochemistry.

[4]  L. Coventry,et al.  Drawing blood from peripheral intravenous cannula compared with venepuncture: A systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2019, Journal of advanced nursing.

[5]  Mario Plebani,et al.  Pre-analytical quality indicators in laboratory medicine: Performance of laboratories participating in the IFCC working group "Laboratory Errors and Patient Safety" project. , 2019, Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry.

[6]  Edward W Randell,et al.  Autoverification of test results in the core clinical laboratory. , 2019, Clinical biochemistry.

[7]  A. Šimundić,et al.  Preanalytical challenges – time for solutions , 2019, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[8]  Edward W Randell,et al.  Delta Checks in the clinical laboratory , 2019, Critical reviews in clinical laboratory sciences.

[9]  B. Karon,et al.  Blood gas sample spiking with total parenteral nutrition, lipid emulsion, and concentrated dextrose solutions as a model for predicting sample contamination based on glucose result. , 2018, Clinical biochemistry.

[10]  D. Najat Prevalence of Pre-Analytical Errors in Clinical Chemistry Diagnostic Labs in Sulaimani City of Iraqi Kurdistan , 2017, PloS one.

[11]  Michael P Cornes,et al.  Exogenous sample contamination. Sources and interference. , 2016, Clinical biochemistry.

[12]  Z. Erbayraktar,et al.  Artificial Neural Network Approach in Laboratory Test Reporting:  Learning Algorithms. , 2016, American journal of clinical pathology.

[13]  S. Costelloe,et al.  Monitoring and reporting of preanalytical errors in laboratory medicine: the UK situation , 2016, Annals of clinical biochemistry.

[14]  K. Mirzaei,et al.  Blood Samples of Peripheral Venous Catheter or The Usual Way: Do Infusion Fluid Alters the Biochemical Test Results? , 2015, Global journal of health science.

[15]  G. Lippi,et al.  Blood sample contamination by glucose-containing solutions: effects and identification , 2013, British journal of biomedical science.

[16]  M. J. Martín,et al.  Efecto en pruebas de coagulación del procedimiento de extracción desde catéter reservorio vascular subcutáneo , 2011 .

[17]  R. Jayaram,et al.  Fatal neuroglycopaenia after accidental use of a glucose 5% solution in a peripheral arterial cannula flush system , 2007, Anaesthesia.

[18]  D. Lobo,et al.  Dilution and redistribution effects of rapid 2-litre infusions of 0.9% (w/v) saline and 5% (w/v) dextrose on haematological parameters and serum biochemistry in normal subjects: a double-blind crossover study. , 2001, Clinical science.

[19]  Nora Nikolac,et al.  Preanalytical quality improvement: in quality we trust , 2013, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[20]  Alan T. Remaley,et al.  Impact of blood collection devices on clinical chemistry assays. , 2010, Clinical biochemistry.