New Models for Improving Supertag Disambiguation

In previous work, supertag disambiguation has been presented as a robust partial parsing technique. In this paper we present two approaches: contextual models, which exploit a variety of features in order to improve supertag performance, and class-based models, which assign sets of supertags to words in order to substantially improve accuracy with only a slight increase in ambiguity.

[1]  Srinivas Bangalore,et al.  The Institute For Research In Cognitive Science Disambiguation of Super Parts of Speech ( or Supertags ) : Almost Parsing by Aravind , 1995 .

[2]  Wolfgang Reichl,et al.  A class-based language model for large-vocabulary speech recognition extracted from part-of-speech statistics , 1999, 1999 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. Proceedings. ICASSP99 (Cat. No.99CH36258).

[3]  Thomas Niesler,et al.  A variable-length category-based n-gram language model , 1996, 1996 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing Conference Proceedings.

[4]  XTAG Research Group,et al.  A Lexicalized Tree Adjoining Grammar for English , 1998, ArXiv.

[5]  Srinivas Bangalore.  Transplanting supertags from English to Spanish , 1998, TAG+.

[6]  R. L. Bradshaw,et al.  RESULTS AND ANALYSIS. , 1971 .

[7]  R. F. Brown,et al.  PERFORMANCE EVALUATION , 2019, ISO 22301:2019 and business continuity management – Understand how to plan, implement and enhance a business continuity management system (BCMS).

[8]  Aravind K. Joshi,et al.  Mathematical and computational aspects of lexicalized grammars , 1990 .

[9]  Ralph Grishman,et al.  The NYU System for MUC-6 or Where’s the Syntax? , 1995, MUC.

[10]  Anne Abeillé,et al.  A Lexicalized Tree Adjoining Grammar for English , 1990 .

[11]  Srinivas Bangalore,et al.  Complexity of lexical descriptions and its relevance to partial parsing , 1997 .

[12]  Michael Collins,et al.  A New Statistical Parser Based on Bigram Lexical Dependencies , 1996, ACL.

[13]  Hans van Halteren,et al.  Improving Data Driven Wordclass Tagging by System Combination , 1998, ACL.

[14]  Steven Abney.  Rapid Incremental Parsing with Repair , 1990 .

[15]  Douglas E. Appelt,et al.  FASTUS: A Cascaded Finite-State Transducer for Extracting Information from Natural-Language Text , 1997, ArXiv.

[16]  金山 裕.  Phrase structure languageの翻訳機械に関する研究〔英文〕 , 1965 .

[17]  Srinivas Bangalore,et al.  Performance Evaluation of Supertagging for Partial Parsing , 2000 .

[18]  David J. Weir,et al.  A Structure-Sharing Parser for Lexicalized Grammars , 1998, COLING-ACL.

[19]  Robert L. Mercer,et al.  Class-Based n-gram Models of Natural Language , 1992, CL.

[20]  Hiyan Alshawi,et al.  Head Automata and Bilingual Tiling: Translation with Minimal Representations , 1996, ACL.

[21]  Eugene Charniak,et al.  Tree-Bank Grammars , 1996, AAAI/IAAI, Vol. 2.

[22]  David M. Magerman.  Statistical Decision-Tree Models for Parsing , 1995, ACL.

[23]  Douglas E. Appelt,et al.  SRI International FASTUS SystemMUC-6 Test Results and Analysis , 1995, MUC.

[24]  Richard M. Schwartz,et al.  Coping with Ambiguity and Unknown Words through Probabilistic Models , 1993, CL.