Cognitive Radio Game: A Framework for Efficiency, Fairness and QoS Guarantee

In this paper we develop a framework for resource allocation in a secondary spectrum access scenario where a group of cognitive radios (CR) access the resources of a primary system. We assume the primary system is a cellular OFDM-based network. We develop the optimum resource allocation strategies which guarantee a level of QoS, defined by minimum rate and the target bit error rate (BER), for the primary system. Using the game theoretic axiom of fairness, i.e., Nash bargaining solutions (NBS), we show that by allocating a priority factor to all players an efficient and fair resource allocation can be achieved. We show how the priority factors are assigned in this scheme and outline a method to select the users who are allowed to share a specific sub-channel.

[1]  Dilip Krishnaswamy,et al.  Game theoretic formulations for network-assisted resource management in wireless networks , 2002, Proceedings IEEE 56th Vehicular Technology Conference.

[2]  Joseph Mitola Cognitive Radio for Flexible Mobile Multimedia Communications , 2001, Mob. Networks Appl..

[3]  Roger B. Myerson,et al.  Game theory - Analysis of Conflict , 1991 .

[4]  Hamid Aghvami,et al.  Cognitive Radio game for secondary spectrum access problem , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[5]  Hamid Aghvami,et al.  A Universal Resource Awareness Channel for Cognitive Radio , 2006, 2006 IEEE 17th International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications.

[6]  Bernhard Walke,et al.  Equilibrium analysis of coexisting IEEE 802.11e wireless LANs , 2003, 14th IEEE Proceedings on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications, 2003. PIMRC 2003..

[7]  Simon Haykin,et al.  Cognitive radio: brain-empowered wireless communications , 2005, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[8]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Convex Optimization , 2004, Algorithms and Theory of Computation Handbook.

[9]  Zhu Han,et al.  Fair multiuser channel allocation for OFDMA networks using Nash bargaining solutions and coalitions , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[10]  Catherine Rosenberg,et al.  A game theoretic framework for bandwidth allocation and pricing in broadband networks , 2000, TNET.

[11]  N. Clemens,et al.  Intelligent power allocation strategies in an unlicensed spectrum , 2005, First IEEE International Symposium on New Frontiers in Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks, 2005. DySPAN 2005..

[12]  Otilia Popescu,et al.  Signal space partitioning versus simultaneous water filling for mutually interfering systems , 2004, IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, 2004. GLOBECOM '04..

[13]  Abhay Parekh,et al.  Spectrum sharing for unlicensed bands , 2005, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[14]  Andrea J. Goldsmith,et al.  Degrees of freedom in adaptive modulation: a unified view , 2001, IEEE Trans. Commun..