Flow-related migration, juvenile dispersal and gonad development in two co-occurring mullet species, Mugil cephalus and Trachystoma petardi, in a regulated river system

Catadromous fish species often use elevated flows to migrate from freshwater to downstream spawning grounds. However, in regulated river systems, artificial barriers and flow alteration can disrupt movement cues, affecting fish migration. Using a combination of acoustic telemetry, passive integrated transponder (PIT) tags and gonad maturity data, we assessed the migratory timing and flow requirements for downstream spawning migrations and upstream dispersal in two co-occurring mullet species in the Logan River, eastern Australia. Over 4 years, 141 adult sea mullet (Mugil cephalus) and 28 adult pinkeye mullet (Trachystoma petardi) were implanted with acoustic transmitters and broad-scale movements tracked using an array of 49 acoustic receivers. Juvenile upstream dispersal was monitored using implanted PIT tags and readers deployed in weir fishways. Sea mullet and pinkeye mullet undertook large-scale downstream migrations from February to March. Movements past weirs only occurred once sufficient flow had occurred and, in the case of pinkeye mullet, when gonads were mature. In contrast, juvenile dispersal into upstream habitats occurred primarily between November and April on low flows. This study advances our understanding of bidirectional movement ecology and flow requirements of two co-occurring mullet species to inform environmental flow management (e.g. to facilitate fish passage) in a regulated river system.

[1]  M. Burford,et al.  Simultaneous assessment of two passage facilities for maintaining hydrological connectivity for subtropical coastal riverine fish , 2018, Ecological Engineering.

[2]  J. Morrongiello,et al.  Connectivity, migration and recruitment in a catadromous fish , 2018 .

[3]  H. Possingham,et al.  Impacts of fishing, river flow and connectivity loss on the conservation of a migratory fish population , 2018 .

[4]  S. Diamond,et al.  Combining otolith chemistry and telemetry to assess diadromous migration in pinkeye mullet, Trachystoma petardi (Actinopterygii, Mugiliformes) , 2018, Hydrobiologia.

[5]  A. Arthington,et al.  Research Priorities to Improve Future Environmental Water Outcomes , 2017, Front. Environ. Sci..

[6]  Ashley M. Fowler,et al.  Sex-specific differences in growth, mortality and migration support population resilience in the heavily exploited migratory marine teleost Mugil cephalus (Linnaeus 1758) , 2017 .

[7]  Richard C. Henderson,et al.  Effectiveness of a Fishway for Restoring Passage of Colorado River Cutthroat Trout , 2017 .

[8]  M. Kennard,et al.  Migration patterns and estuarine aggregations of a catadromous fish, Australian bass (Percalates novemaculeata) in a regulated river system , 2017 .

[9]  Matthew E. Watts,et al.  Integrating research using animal‐borne telemetry with the needs of conservation management , 2017 .

[10]  Adam T. Piper,et al.  Movement patterns of seaward migrating European eel (Anguilla anguilla) at a complex of riverine barriers: implications for conservation , 2017 .

[11]  Ashley M. Fowler,et al.  Partial migration of grey mullet (Mugil cephalus) on Australia's east coast revealed by otolith chemistry. , 2016, Marine environmental research.

[12]  S. Carlson,et al.  Feasibility of Using Passive Integrated Transponder Technology for Studying the Ecology of Juvenile Striped Mullet (Mugil cephalus) in Streams1 , 2016, Pacific Science.

[13]  T. Arai,et al.  Year-round spawning by a tropical catadromous eel Anguilla bicolor bicolor , 2016 .

[14]  F. Pelicice,et al.  Large reservoirs as ecological barriers to downstream movements of Neotropical migratory fish , 2015 .

[15]  R. Rolls,et al.  Can Species Traits Predict the Susceptibility of Riverine Fish to Water Resource Development? An Australian Case Study , 2015, Environmental Management.

[16]  R. Rolls,et al.  Consequences of connectivity alteration on riverine fish assemblages: potential opportunities to overcome constraints in applying conventional monitoring designs , 2013 .

[17]  C. Walsh,et al.  Australian diadromous fishes – challenges and solutions for understanding migrations in the 21st century , 2013 .

[18]  Ross G. Dwyer,et al.  V-Track: software for analysing and visualising animal movement from acoustic telemetry detections , 2012 .

[19]  A. Whitfield,et al.  A global review of the cosmopolitan flathead mullet Mugil cephalus Linnaeus 1758 (Teleostei: Mugilidae), with emphasis on the biology, genetics, ecology and fisheries aspects of this apparent species complex , 2012, Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries.

[20]  D. L. Parrish,et al.  Migration delays caused by anthropogenic barriers: modeling dams, temperature, and success of migrating salmon smolts , 2011 .

[21]  D. Crook,et al.  Variability in Sr:Ca and Ba:Ca ratios in water and fish otoliths across an estuarine salinity gradient , 2010 .

[22]  M. Norman,et al.  Does otolith chemistry indicate diadromous lifecycles for five Australian riverine fishes , 2009 .

[23]  P. Lehman.  The influence of phytoplankton community composition on primary productivity along the riverine to freshwater tidal continuum in the San Joaquin River, California , 2007 .

[24]  C. Wenner,et al.  Sexual differentiation and gonad development in striped mullet (Mugil cephalus L.) from South Carolina estuaries , 2005 .

[25]  Y. Iizuka,et al.  Migratory environmental history of the grey mullet Mugil cephalus as revealed by otolith Sr:Ca ratios , 2004 .

[26]  K. Aarestrup,et al.  Survival of migrating sea trout (Salmo trutta) and Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) smolts negotiating weirs in small Danish rivers , 2003 .

[27]  A. Arthington,et al.  Basic Principles and Ecological Consequences of Altered Flow Regimes for Aquatic Biodiversity , 2002, Environmental management.

[28]  I. Stuart,et al.  Upstream passage of fish through a vertical-slot fishway in an Australian subtropical river , 2002 .

[29]  C. Pringle.  HYDROLOGIC CONNECTIVITY AND THE MANAGEMENT OF BIOLOGICAL RESERVES: A GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE , 2001 .

[30]  I. Stuart,et al.  An assessment of the effectiveness of a vertical‐slot fishway for non‐salmonid fish at a tidal barrier on a large tropical/subtropical river , 1999 .

[31]  D. Russell.  Fish Movements through a Fishway on a Tidal Barrage in Sub-tropical Queensland , 1991 .

[32]  G. West.  Methods of Assessing Ovarian development in Fishes: a Review , 1990 .

[33]  J. H. Harris,et al.  Reproduction of the Australian Bass, Macquaria novemaculeata (Perciformes : Percichthyidae) in the Sydney Basin , 1986 .

[34]  I. Potter,et al.  Age, stucture, growth rates and movements of sea mullet, Mugil cephalus L., and Yellow-eye Mullet, Aldrichetta forsteri (Valenciennes), in the Swan-Avon river system, Western Australia , 1981 .

[35]  E. I. L. Silva,et al.  Biology of young grey mullet, Mugil cephalus L., populatioins in a coastal lagoon in Sri Lanka , 1979 .

[36]  A. Bok.  THE DISTRIBUTION AND ECOLOGY OF TWO MULLET SPECIES IN SOME FRESH WATER RIVERS IN THE EASTERN CAPE, SOUTH AFRICA , 1979 .

[37]  J. Shireman.  Gonadal Development of Striped Mullet (Mugil Cephalus) in Freshwater , 1975 .

[38]  A. Spain,et al.  Reproduction, growth and size allometry of Mugil cephalus Linnaeus (Pisces : Mugilidae) from north Queensland inshore waters , 1975 .

[39]  J. M. Thomson.  The grey mullets , 1966 .