Histone hyperacetylation does not alter the positioning or stability of phased nucleosomes on the mouse mammary tumor virus long terminal repeat.

Activation of mouse mammary tumor virus transcription by the hormone-bound glucocorticoid receptor results in disruption of a nucleosome that is specifically positioned on the promoter. Limited treatment of cells with the histone deacetylase inhibitor sodium butyrate prevents receptor-dependent promoter activation and nucleosome disruption [Bresnick, E. H., John, S., Berard, D. S., LeFebvre, P., & Hager, G. L. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 87, 3977-3981]. On the basis of this observation, we undertook a series of experiments to compare the structure of normal and hyperacetylated mouse mammary tumor virus chromatin. Although butyrate prevents hormone-induced restriction enzyme cutting specifically in the B nucleosome region, chromatin containing hyperacetylated histones does not differ from normal chromatin in general sensitivity to restriction enzymes. Indirect end-labeling analysis of micrococcal nuclease digested chromatin reveals that nucleosomes are identically phased on the mouse mammary tumor virus long terminal repeat in normal and hyperacetylated chromatin. A synthetic DNA fragment spanning the B nucleosome region was reconstituted into a monosome by using core particles containing normal or hyperacetylated histones. Analysis of the structure of reconstituted monosomes by nondenaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, salt stability, thermal stability, restriction enzyme accessibility, and exonuclease III or DNase I footprinting reveals no effect of histone hyperacetylation on monosome structure. These observations suggest that histone hyperacetylation does not induce a major change in the structure of mouse mammary tumor virus chromatin, such as nucleosome unfolding.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

[1]  G. Hager,et al.  Transcription factor access is mediated by accurately positioned nucleosomes on the mouse mammary tumor virus promoter , 1991, Molecular and cellular biology.

[2]  K. V. van Holde,et al.  DNA and protein determinants of nucleosome positioning on sea urchin 5S rRNA gene sequences in vitro. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  J. Schmitz,et al.  Role of trans‐activating proteins in the generation of active chromatin at the PHO5 promoter in S. cerevisiae. , 1990, The EMBO journal.

[4]  M. Grunstein,et al.  Genetic evidence for an interaction between SIR3 and histone H4 in the repression of the silent mating loci in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  D. Bazett-Jones,et al.  Histone hyperacetylation can induce unfolding of the nucleosome core particle. , 1990, Nucleic acids research.

[6]  G. Hager,et al.  Glucocorticoid receptor-dependent disruption of a specific nucleosome on the mouse mammary tumor virus promoter is prevented by sodium butyrate. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  M. Beato,et al.  Nucleosome positioning modulates accessibility of regulatory proteins to the mouse mammary tumor virus promoter , 1990, Cell.

[8]  B. Morgan,et al.  Genetic analysis of histone H4: essential role of lysines subject to reversible acetylation. , 1990, Science.

[9]  A. Csordás,et al.  On the biological role of histone acetylation. , 1990, The Biochemical journal.

[10]  K. V. van Holde,et al.  Homogeneous reconstituted oligonucleosomes, evidence for salt-dependent folding in the absence of histone H1. , 1989, Biochemistry.

[11]  K. Yoshikawa,et al.  Interaction of rat liver glucocorticoid receptor with histones. , 1989, Endocrinology.

[12]  P. Loidl Towards an understanding of the biological function of histone acetylation , 1988, FEBS letters.

[13]  G. Hager,et al.  Binding of multiple factors to the MMTV promoter in crude and fractionated nuclear extracts. , 1988, Nucleic acids research.

[14]  A. Klug,et al.  The bending of DNA in nucleosomes and its wider implications. , 1987, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[15]  H. Richard-Foy,et al.  Mechanism of dexamethasone 21-mesylate antiglucocorticoid action: II. Receptor-antiglucocorticoid complexes do not interact productively with mouse mammary tumor virus long terminal repeat chromatin. , 1987, Molecular endocrinology.

[16]  H. Richard-Foy,et al.  Sequence‐specific positioning of nucleosomes over the steroid‐inducible MMTV promoter. , 1987, The EMBO journal.

[17]  G. Fasman,et al.  Structural studies of acetylated and control inner core histones. , 1987, Biochemistry.

[18]  G. Hager,et al.  Steroid-dependent interaction of transcription factors with the inducible promoter of mouse mammary tumor virus in vivo , 1987, Cell.

[19]  E. Buetti,et al.  Distinct sequence elements involved in the glucocorticoid regulation of the mouse mammary tumor virus promoter identified by linker scanning mutagenesis. , 1986, Journal of molecular biology.

[20]  E. Bradbury,et al.  Hyperacetylation of core histones does not cause unfolding of nucleosomes. Neutron scatter data accords with disc shape of the nucleosome. , 1986, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[21]  K. V. van Holde,et al.  Histone hyperacetylation: its effects on nucleosome conformation and stability. , 1986, Biochemistry.

[22]  H. Richard-Foy,et al.  Glucocorticoid regulation of transcription at an amplified, episomal promoter , 1983, Molecular and cellular biology.

[23]  J. Bode,et al.  Nucleosomal particles open as the histone core becomes hyperacetylated. , 1983, European journal of biochemistry.

[24]  E. Bradbury,et al.  Thermal denaturation studies of acetylated nucleosomes and oligonucleosomes. , 1982, European journal of biochemistry.

[25]  M. Perry,et al.  Histone acetylation increases the solubility of chromatin and occurs sequentially over most of the chromatin. A novel model for the biological role of histone acetylation. , 1982, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[26]  M. Levitt,et al.  Periodicity of deoxyribonuclease I digestion of chromatin. , 1979, Science.

[27]  V. Allfrey,et al.  Suppression of histone deacetylation in vivo and in vitro by sodium butyrate. , 1978, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[28]  R. Chalkley,et al.  The effect of sodium butyrate on histone modification , 1978, Cell.