Machine‐learning scoring functions to improve structure‐based binding affinity prediction and virtual screening
暂无分享,去创建一个
Pedro J Ballester | Antoniya A. Aleksandrova | Qurrat Ul Ain | Antoniya Aleksandrova | Florian D Roessler | Florian D. Roessler | Q. Ain | P. Ballester
[1] J. Irwin,et al. Benchmarking sets for molecular docking. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[2] John B. O. Mitchell,et al. Hierarchical virtual screening for the discovery of new molecular scaffolds in antibacterial hit identification , 2012, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.
[3] Zhihai Liu,et al. Comparative Assessment of Scoring Functions on an Updated Benchmark: 2. Evaluation Methods and General Results , 2014, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[4] Teruki Honma,et al. Combining Machine Learning and Pharmacophore-Based Interaction Fingerprint for in Silico Screening , 2010, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[5] Philip E. Bourne,et al. Correction to "A Machine Learning-Based Method To Improve Docking Scoring Functions and Its Application to Drug Repurposing" , 2011, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[6] Gilles Marcou,et al. Predicting the Predictability: A Unified Approach to the Applicability Domain Problem of QSAR Models , 2009, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[7] J C Gertrudes,et al. Machine learning techniques and drug design. , 2012, Current medicinal chemistry.
[8] Gaurav Pandey,et al. Computational Approaches for Protein Function Prediction : A Survey , 2006 .
[9] John B. O. Mitchell. Machine learning methods in chemoinformatics , 2014, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Computational molecular science.
[10] Peter Ertl,et al. Bioisosteric Replacement and Scaffold Hopping in Lead Generation and Optimization , 2010, Molecular informatics.
[11] Gerhard Klebe,et al. Non-additivity of functional group contributions in protein-ligand binding: a comprehensive study by crystallography and isothermal titration calorimetry. , 2010, Journal of molecular biology.
[12] Dik-Lung Ma,et al. Drug repositioning by structure-based virtual screening. , 2013, Chemical Society reviews.
[13] Jinyan Li,et al. Binding Affinity Prediction for Protein-Ligand Complexes Based on β Contacts and B Factor , 2013, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[14] Yu Wang,et al. A comparative study of family-specific protein–ligand complex affinity prediction based on random forest approach , 2015, Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design.
[15] Yanli Wang,et al. Structure-Based Virtual Screening for Drug Discovery: a Problem-Centric Review , 2012, The AAPS Journal.
[16] Peter Gedeck,et al. Leave-Cluster-Out Cross-Validation Is Appropriate for Scoring Functions Derived from Diverse Protein Data Sets , 2010, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[17] Bo Yang,et al. Integrating docking scores, interaction profiles and molecular descriptors to improve the accuracy of molecular docking: toward the discovery of novel Akt1 inhibitors. , 2014, European journal of medicinal chemistry.
[18] Robert P. Sheridan,et al. Using Random Forest To Model the Domain Applicability of Another Random Forest Model , 2013, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[19] Scott Boyer,et al. Assessment of Machine Learning Reliability Methods for Quantifying the Applicability Domain of QSAR Regression Models , 2014, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[20] Piotr Zielenkiewicz,et al. Open Drug Discovery Toolkit (ODDT): a new open-source player in the drug discovery field , 2015, Journal of Cheminformatics.
[21] P Willett,et al. Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.
[22] S. Wold,et al. A PLS kernel algorithm for data sets with many variables and fewer objects. Part 1: Theory and algorithm , 1994 .
[23] Kwong-Sak Leung,et al. istar: A Web Platform for Large-Scale Protein-Ligand Docking , 2014, PloS one.
[24] N Sukumar,et al. Predictive cheminformatics in drug discovery: statistical modeling for analysis of micro-array and gene expression data. , 2012, Methods in molecular biology.
[25] David S. Goodsell,et al. AutoDock4 and AutoDockTools4: Automated docking with selective receptor flexibility , 2009, J. Comput. Chem..
[26] J Andrew McCammon,et al. BINANA: a novel algorithm for ligand-binding characterization. , 2011, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.
[27] Wei Deng,et al. Predicting Protein-Ligand Binding Affinities Using Novel Geometrical Descriptors and Machine-Learning Methods , 2004, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[28] Olivier Sperandio,et al. Free resources to assist structure-based virtual ligand screening experiments. , 2007, Current protein & peptide science.
[29] Emidio Capriotti,et al. Bioinformatics and variability in drug response: a protein structural perspective , 2012, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.
[30] Sebastian G. Rohrer,et al. Maximum Unbiased Validation (MUV) Data Sets for Virtual Screening Based on PubChem Bioactivity Data , 2009, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[31] Chee Keong Kwoh,et al. CScore: a simple yet effective scoring function for protein-ligand binding affinity prediction using modified CMAC learning architecture. , 2011, Journal of bioinformatics and computational biology.
[32] Kwong-Sak Leung,et al. Low-Quality Structural and Interaction Data Improves Binding Affinity Prediction via Random Forest , 2015, Molecules.
[33] H. Kitano,et al. Combining Machine Learning Systems and Multiple Docking Simulation Packages to Improve Docking Prediction Reliability for Network Pharmacology , 2013, PloS one.
[34] W. Janzen,et al. High Throughput Screening , 2009, Methods in Molecular Biology.
[35] Douglas R. Houston,et al. Consensus Docking: Improving the Reliability of Docking in a Virtual Screening Context , 2013, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[36] Hege S. Beard,et al. Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 2. Enrichment factors in database screening. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[37] Jessica Holien,et al. Improvements, trends, and new ideas in molecular docking: 2012–2013 in review , 2015, Journal of molecular recognition : JMR.
[38] Gerhard Klebe,et al. SFCscore: Scoring functions for affinity prediction of protein–ligand complexes , 2008, Proteins.
[39] Tom L. Blundell,et al. Does a More Precise Chemical Description of Protein–Ligand Complexes Lead to More Accurate Prediction of Binding Affinity? , 2014, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[40] C. Venkatachalam,et al. LigScore: a novel scoring function for predicting binding affinities. , 2005, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.
[41] Leo Breiman,et al. Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.
[42] Matthew P. Repasky,et al. Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method and assessment of docking accuracy. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[43] Christine Humblet,et al. Lead optimization via high-throughput molecular docking. , 2007, Current opinion in drug discovery & development.
[44] Wagner Meira,et al. aCSM: noise-free graph-based signatures to large-scale receptor-based ligand prediction , 2013, Bioinform..
[45] Philip E. Bourne,et al. A Machine Learning-Based Method To Improve Docking Scoring Functions and Its Application to Drug Repurposing , 2011, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[46] Nihar R. Mahapatra,et al. A Comparative Assessment of Predictive Accuracies of Conventional and Machine Learning Scoring Functions for Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction , 2012, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics.
[47] Brian K Shoichet,et al. Prediction of protein-ligand interactions. Docking and scoring: successes and gaps. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[48] C. E. Peishoff,et al. A critical assessment of docking programs and scoring functions. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[49] Natalia Artemenko,et al. Distance Dependent Scoring Function for Describing Protein-Ligand Intermolecular Interactions , 2008, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[50] Aniko Simon,et al. eHiTS: a new fast, exhaustive flexible ligand docking system. , 2007, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.
[51] Gerard J. P. van Westen,et al. Chemical, Target, and Bioactive Properties of Allosteric Modulation , 2014, PLoS Comput. Biol..
[52] Pedro J Ballester,et al. Ultrafast shape recognition: method and applications. , 2011, Future medicinal chemistry.
[53] Christoph A. Sotriffer,et al. Scoring Functions for Protein–Ligand Interactions , 2012 .
[54] John B. O. Mitchell,et al. A machine learning approach to predicting protein-ligand binding affinity with applications to molecular docking , 2010, Bioinform..
[55] Jacob D. Durrant,et al. Comparing Neural-Network Scoring Functions and the State of the Art: Applications to Common Library Screening , 2013, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[56] Kwong-Sak Leung,et al. The Impact of Docking Pose Generation Error on the Prediction of Binding Affinity , 2014, CIBB.
[57] Martin Frank,et al. Computation of Binding Energies Including Their Enthalpy and Entropy Components for Protein-Ligand Complexes Using Support Vector Machines , 2013, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[58] C. Springer,et al. PostDOCK: a structural, empirical approach to scoring protein ligand complexes. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[59] Christoph A. Sotriffer,et al. SFCscoreRF: A Random Forest-Based Scoring Function for Improved Affinity Prediction of Protein-Ligand Complexes , 2013, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[60] Igor I. Baskin,et al. Machine Learning Methods for Property Prediction in Chemoinformatics: Quo Vadis? , 2012, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[61] Xavier Morelli,et al. GFscore: A General Nonlinear Consensus Scoring Function for High-Throughput Docking , 2006, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[62] Johannes C. Hermann,et al. Structure-based activity prediction for an enzyme of unknown function , 2007, Nature.
[63] Marcel L Verdonk,et al. General and targeted statistical potentials for protein–ligand interactions , 2005, Proteins.
[64] Jacob D. Durrant,et al. NNScore: A Neural-Network-Based Scoring Function for the Characterization of Protein−Ligand Complexes , 2010, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[65] Pedro J. Ballester,et al. Ultrafast shape recognition for similarity search in molecular databases , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.
[66] Liwei Li,et al. Target-Specific Support Vector Machine Scoring in Structure-Based Virtual Screening: Computational Validation, In Vitro Testing in Kinases, and Effects on Lung Cancer Cell Proliferation , 2011, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[67] Christopher I. Bayly,et al. Evaluating Virtual Screening Methods: Good and Bad Metrics for the "Early Recognition" Problem , 2007, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[68] Isidro Cortes-Ciriano,et al. Polypharmacology modelling using proteochemometrics (PCM): recent methodological developments, applications to target families, and future prospects , 2015 .
[69] James M. Anderson,et al. Experimental versus predicted affinities for ligand binding to estrogen receptor: iterative selection and rescoring of docked poses systematically improves the correlation , 2013, Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design.
[70] Richard D. Smith,et al. CSAR Benchmark Exercise of 2010: Combined Evaluation Across All Submitted Scoring Functions , 2011, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[71] John B. O. Mitchell,et al. Comments on "Leave-Cluster-Out Cross-Validation Is Appropriate for Scoring Functions Derived from Diverse Protein Data Sets": Significance for the Validation of Scoring Functions , 2011, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[72] Zhiqiang Yan,et al. Optimizing the affinity and specificity of ligand binding with the inclusion of solvation effect , 2015, Proteins.
[73] LarrañagaPedro,et al. A review of feature selection techniques in bioinformatics , 2007 .
[74] Gisbert Schneider,et al. Virtual screening: an endless staircase? , 2010, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.
[75] Xin Chen,et al. Optimization of molecular docking scores with support vector rank regression , 2013, Proteins.
[76] Min Zhu,et al. Protein-Protein Binding Affinity Prediction Based on an SVR Ensemble , 2012, ICIC.
[77] Gisbert Schneider,et al. Machine Learning Estimates of Natural Product Conformational Energies , 2014, PLoS Comput. Biol..
[78] Pedro J. Ballester,et al. Machine Learning Scoring Functions Based on Random Forest and Support Vector Regression , 2012, PRIB.
[79] Gary B. Fogel,et al. Computational Intelligence Methods for Docking Scores , 2009 .
[80] Lin-Li Li,et al. ID-Score: A New Empirical Scoring Function Based on a Comprehensive Set of Descriptors Related to Protein-Ligand Interactions , 2013, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[81] A. Tropsha,et al. Development of quantitative structure-binding affinity relationship models based on novel geometrical chemical descriptors of the protein-ligand interfaces. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[82] G. Klebe,et al. Knowledge-based scoring function to predict protein-ligand interactions. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.
[83] Julie Clark,et al. Discovery of Novel Antimalarial Compounds Enabled by QSAR-Based Virtual Screening , 2013, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[84] Igor V. Tetko,et al. Online chemical modeling environment (OCHEM): web platform for data storage, model development and publishing of chemical information , 2011, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[85] Li Xing,et al. Discovery of potent inhibitors of soluble epoxide hydrolase by combinatorial library design and structure-based virtual screening. , 2011, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[86] Ata Amini,et al. A general approach for developing system‐specific functions to score protein–ligand docked complexes using support vector inductive logic programming , 2007, Proteins.
[87] Zhihai Liu,et al. Comparative Assessment of Scoring Functions on a Diverse Test Set , 2009, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[88] Lei Li,et al. Improved protein-ligand binding affinity prediction by using a curvature-dependent surface-area model , 2014, Bioinform..
[89] Jian Wang,et al. Characterization of Small Molecule Binding. I. Accurate Identification of Strong Inhibitors in Virtual Screening , 2013, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[90] D. E. Clark,et al. Outstanding challenges in protein–ligand docking and structure‐based virtual screening , 2011 .
[91] Xiaoqin Zou,et al. Scoring functions and their evaluation methods for protein-ligand docking: recent advances and future directions. , 2010, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.
[92] Alexander D. MacKerell,et al. Computational evaluation of protein-small molecule binding. , 2009, Current opinion in structural biology.
[93] Pedro Larrañaga,et al. A review of feature selection techniques in bioinformatics , 2007, Bioinform..
[94] Zhiqiang Yan,et al. Scoring Functions of Protein-Ligand Interactions , 2016 .
[95] Pierre Baldi,et al. A CROC stronger than ROC: measuring, visualizing and optimizing early retrieval , 2010, Bioinform..
[96] John P. Overington,et al. ChEMBL: a large-scale bioactivity database for drug discovery , 2011, Nucleic Acids Res..
[97] Jacob D. Durrant,et al. NNScore 2.0: A Neural-Network Receptor–Ligand Scoring Function , 2011, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[98] M. Jacobson,et al. Molecular mechanics methods for predicting protein-ligand binding. , 2006, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.
[99] Sourav Das,et al. Binding Affinity Prediction with Property-Encoded Shape Distribution Signatures , 2010, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[100] Wei Zhao,et al. A statistical framework to evaluate virtual screening , 2009, BMC Bioinformatics.
[101] Jonathan W. Essex,et al. Water Network Perturbation in Ligand Binding: Adenosine A2A Antagonists as a Case Study , 2013, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[102] Ryan G. Coleman,et al. ZINC: A Free Tool to Discover Chemistry for Biology , 2012, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[103] Kwong-Sak Leung,et al. Improving AutoDock Vina Using Random Forest: The Growing Accuracy of Binding Affinity Prediction by the Effective Exploitation of Larger Data Sets , 2015, Molecular informatics.
[104] Bo Wang,et al. Support Vector Regression Scoring of Receptor-Ligand Complexes for Rank-Ordering and Virtual Screening of Chemical Libraries , 2011, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[105] David L. Mobley,et al. Let’s get honest about sampling , 2011, Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design.
[106] Arthur J. Olson,et al. AutoDock Vina: Improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading , 2009, J. Comput. Chem..
[107] Paola Gramatica,et al. Principles of QSAR models validation: internal and external , 2007 .
[108] Kwong-Sak Leung,et al. Substituting random forest for multiple linear regression improves binding affinity prediction of scoring functions: Cyscore as a case study , 2014, BMC Bioinformatics.
[109] Robert P. Sheridan,et al. Deep Neural Nets as a Method for Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships , 2015, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[110] Xiang-Qun Xie,et al. Exploiting PubChem for virtual screening , 2010, Expert opinion on drug discovery.
[111] William L Jorgensen,et al. Efficient drug lead discovery and optimization. , 2009, Accounts of chemical research.
[112] J. Pin,et al. Virtual screening workflow development guided by the "receiver operating characteristic" curve approach. Application to high-throughput docking on metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype 4. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.