The time-course of pop-out search

Olds, Cowan and Jolicoeur [2000. Tracking visual search over space and time. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review (in press)] interrupted pop-out search by adding distractors to a display after a delay. They analyzed the response time distributions from conditions with different delays for interruption and showed that when pop-out search fails, its partially completed computations can be used to assist other, slower search processes. This paper demonstrates that expectancies, numbers of items and colors in the display, and color onsets do not explain those results. Finally, an experiment in which the target was moved mid-trial demonstrates that partial pop-out assists difficult search by indicating something about where the target is, or where the target is not.

[1]  Jeremy M. Wolfe,et al.  Just Say No: How Are Visual Searches Terminated When There Is No Target Present? , 1996, Cognitive Psychology.

[2]  P. Jolicoeur,et al.  A Solution to the Effect of Sample Size on Outlier Elimination , 1994 .

[3]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[4]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Why are there eccentricity effects in visual search? Visual and attentional hypotheses , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.

[5]  Elizabeth S. Olds,et al.  Stimulus-determined discrimination mechanisms for color search , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[6]  W. Cowan,et al.  Visual search for colour targets that are or are not linearly separable from distractors , 1996, Vision Research.

[7]  MARISA CARRASCO,et al.  Cortical Magnification Neutralizes the Eccentricity Effect in Visual Search , 1997, Vision Research.

[8]  Elizabeth S. Olds,et al.  Tracking visual search over space and time , 2000, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[9]  R. Parasuraman.  The attentive brain , 1998 .

[10]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Visual marking: prioritizing selection for new objects by top-down attentional inhibition of old objects. , 1997, Psychological review.

[11]  M. Carrasco,et al.  The eccentricity effect: Target eccentricity affects performance on conjunction searches , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[12]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Guided Search 2.0 A revised model of visual search , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[13]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[14]  M. Carrasco,et al.  The temporal dynamics of visual search: evidence for parallel processing in feature and conjunction searches. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  J. Cohen,et al.  Color Science: Concepts and Methods, Quantitative Data and Formulas , 1968 .

[16]  P Jolicoeur,et al.  The linear separability effect in color visual search: Ruling out the additive color hypothesis , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.

[17]  Gunther Wyszecki,et al.  Color Science: Concepts and Methods, Quantitative Data and Formulae, 2nd Edition , 2000 .

[18]  Vision Research , 1961, Nature.

[19]  DAVID G. KENDALL,et al.  Introduction to Mathematical Statistics , 1947, Nature.

[20]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Attention, pattern recognition and popout in visual search , 1998 .

[21]  Michael D'Zmura,et al.  Color in visual search , 1991, Vision Research.

[22]  J. Wolfe,et al.  What Can 1 Million Trials Tell Us About Visual Search? , 1998 .

[23]  U. Neisser.  VISUAL SEARCH. , 1964, Scientific American.

[24]  William B. Cowan,et al.  Convex hull test of the linear separability hypothesis in visual search , 1999, Vision Research.

[25]  Susan L. Franzel,et al.  Guided search: an alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[26]  Todd S. Horowitz,et al.  Visual search has no memory , 1998, Nature.

[27]  William B. Cowan,et al.  Effective color CRT calibration techniques for perception research , 1999 .