Controlling promoter strength and regulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using synthetic hybrid promoters

A dynamic range of well‐controlled constitutive and tunable promoters are essential for metabolic engineering and synthetic biology applications in all host organisms. Here, we apply a synthetic hybrid promoter approach for the creation of strong promoter libraries in the model yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Synthetic hybrid promoters are composed of two modular components—the enhancer element, consisting of tandem repeats or combinations of upstream activation sequences (UAS), and the core promoter element. We demonstrate the utility of this approach with three main case studies. First, we establish a dynamic range of constitutive promoters and in doing so expand transcriptional capacity of the strongest constitutive yeast promoter, PGPD, by 2.5‐fold in terms of mRNA levels. Second, we demonstrate the capacity to impart synthetic regulation through a hybrid promoter approach by adding galactose activation and removing glucose repression. Third, we establish a collection of galactose‐inducible hybrid promoters that span a nearly 50‐fold dynamic range of galactose‐induced expression levels and increase the transcriptional capacity of the Gal1 promoter by 15%. These results demonstrate that promoters in S. cerevisiae, and potentially all yeast, are enhancer limited and a synthetic hybrid promoter approach can expand, enhance, and control promoter activity. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2012; 109: 2884–2895. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  J. Bassel,et al.  Genetic Order of the Galactose Structural Genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1971, Journal of bacteriology.

[2]  C. V. Van Slyke,et al.  The essential transcription factor Reb1p interacts with the CLB2 UAS outside of the G2/M control region. , 2003, Nucleic acids research.

[3]  M. Penttilä,et al.  Xylose-metabolizing Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains overexpressing the TKL1 and TAL1 genes encoding the pentose phosphate pathway enzymes transketolase and transaldolase , 1995, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[4]  P. R. Jensen,et al.  The level of glucose‐6‐phosphate dehydrogenase activity strongly influences xylose fermentation and inhibitor sensitivity in recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains , 2003, Yeast.

[5]  Hal Alper,et al.  Tuning Gene Expression in Yarrowia lipolytica by a Hybrid Promoter Approach , 2011, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[6]  N. D. Da Silva,et al.  Introduction and expression of genes for metabolic engineering applications in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2012, FEMS yeast research.

[7]  M. Holland,et al.  Structural comparison of two nontandemly repeated yeast glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase genes. , 1980, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[8]  M Aldea,et al.  A Set of Vectors with a Tetracycline‐Regulatable Promoter System for Modulated Gene Expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1997, Yeast.

[9]  Christina D. Smolke,et al.  Synthetic RNA modules for fine-tuning gene expression levels in yeast by modulating RNase III activity , 2011, Nucleic acids research.

[10]  M. Ptashne,et al.  Saccharomyces cerevisiae GAL1-GAL10 divergent promoter region: location and function of the upstream activating sequence UASG , 1984, Molecular and cellular biology.

[11]  Jeffrey H. Miller Experiments in molecular genetics , 1972 .

[12]  A. Gatignol,et al.  Cloning of Saccharomyces cerevisiae promoters using a probe vector based on phleomycin resistance. , 1990, Gene.

[13]  Xuming Deng,et al.  Construction and characterization of bidirectional expression vectors in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2008, FEMS yeast research.

[14]  L. Comstock,et al.  The tac promoter: a functional hybrid derived from the trp and lac promoters. , 1983, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  M. Ciriacy,et al.  Identification of novel HXT genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae reveals the impact of individual hexose transporters on qlycolytic flux , 1995, Molecular microbiology.

[16]  Thomas Jeffries,et al.  Shuffling of Promoters for Multiple Genes To Optimize Xylose Fermentation in an Engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae Strain , 2007, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[17]  Huimin Zhao,et al.  Iowa State University From the SelectedWorks of Zengyi Shao 2012 Cloning and characterization of a panel of constitutive promoters for applications in pathway engineering in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2017 .

[18]  H. Alper,et al.  From Pathways to Genomes and Beyond: The Metabolic Engineering Toolbox and Its Place in Biofuels Production , 2011 .

[19]  Christina D Smolke,et al.  A synthetic library of RNA control modules for predictable tuning of gene expression in yeast , 2011, Molecular systems biology.

[20]  Gregory Stephanopoulos,et al.  Engineering promoter regulation , 2007, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[21]  L. Guarente,et al.  Distinctly regulated tandem upstream activation sites mediate catabolite repression of the CYC1 gene of S. cerevisiae , 1984, Cell.

[22]  Jens Nielsen,et al.  Reconstruction of a bacterial isoprenoid biosynthetic pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2008, FEBS letters.

[23]  L. Guarente,et al.  Upstream activation sites of the CYC1 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae are active when inverted but not when placed downstream of the "TATA box". , 1984, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  L. Guarente,et al.  A GAL10-CYC1 hybrid yeast promoter identifies the GAL4 regulatory region as an upstream site. , 1982, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  Gregory Stephanopoulos,et al.  Engineering of Promoter Replacement Cassettes for Fine-Tuning of Gene Expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2006, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[26]  M. Rosenkrantz,et al.  Distinct upstream activation regions for glucose-repressed and derepressed expression of the yeast citrate synthase gene CIT1 , 1994, Current Genetics.

[27]  L. Guarente,et al.  Fusion of Escherichia coli lacZ to the cytochrome c gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1981, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  R. Müller,et al.  Yeast vectors for the controlled expression of heterologous proteins in different genetic backgrounds. , 1995, Gene.

[29]  J. Sambrook,et al.  Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual , 2001 .

[30]  Guillermo Gosset,et al.  Coutilization of glucose and glycerol enhances the production of aromatic compounds in an Escherichia coli strain lacking the phosphoenolpyruvate: carbohydrate phosphotransferase system , 2008, Microbial cell factories.

[31]  Jack T. Pronk,et al.  Engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for Efficient Anaerobic Alcoholic Fermentation of l-Arabinose , 2007, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[32]  Jay D Keasling,et al.  Engineering of the pyruvate dehydrogenase bypass in Saccharomyces cerevisiae for high-level production of isoprenoids. , 2007, Metabolic engineering.

[33]  Michael Q. Zhang,et al.  SCPD: a promoter database of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1999, Bioinform..

[34]  L. Guarente Yeast promoters and lacZ fusions designed to study expression of cloned genes in yeast. , 1983, Methods in enzymology.

[35]  M. Holland,et al.  Isolation and identification of yeast messenger ribonucleic acids coding for enolase, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, and phosphoglycerate kinase. , 1978, Biochemistry.

[36]  J. Collins,et al.  Combinatorial promoter design for engineering noisy gene expression , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[37]  R. Müller,et al.  Regulatable promoters of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: comparison of transcriptional activity and their use for heterologous expression. , 1994, Nucleic acids research.

[38]  G. Stephanopoulos,et al.  Tuning genetic control through promoter engineering. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[39]  Kristy M. Hawkins,et al.  The Regulatory Roles of the Galactose Permease and Kinase in the Induction Response of the GAL Network in Saccharomyces cerevisiae* , 2006, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[40]  A 28-bp segment of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae PHO5 upstream activator sequence confers phosphate control to the CYC1-lacZ gene fusion. , 1988, Gene.

[41]  H. Alper,et al.  Synthetic Biology: Tools to Design, Build, and Optimize Cellular Processes , 2010, Journal of biomedicine & biotechnology.

[42]  Timothy S. Ham,et al.  Production of the antimalarial drug precursor artemisinic acid in engineered yeast , 2006, Nature.

[43]  B. G. Adams Induction of Galactokinase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Kinetics of Induction and Glucose Effects , 1972, Journal of bacteriology.

[44]  M. Johnston,et al.  Multiple mechanisms provide rapid and stringent glucose repression of GAL gene expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1994, Molecular and cellular biology.

[45]  Alyssa M. Redding,et al.  Metabolic engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for the production of n-butanol , 2008, Microbial cell factories.