Corporate Elite Networks and Governance Changes in the 1980s

Changes in corporate governance practices can be analyzed by linking the adaptations of individual firms to the structures of the networks in which firms' decision makers are embedded. Network structures determine the speed of adaptation and ultimate patterns of prevalence of governance practices by exposing a firm to particular role models and standards of appropriateness. The authors compare the spreads of two governance innovations adopted in response to the 1980s takeover wave: poison pills (which spread rapidly through a board‐to‐board diffusion process) and golden parachutes (which spread slowly through geographic proximity). The study closes with a discussion of networks as links between individual adaptation and collective structures.

[1]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[2]  Ivone Kirkpatrick,et al.  The inner circle : memoirs , 1959 .

[3]  Elihu Katz,et al.  The Social Itinerary of Technical Change: Two Studies on the Diffusion of Innovation , 1961 .

[4]  J. Coleman,et al.  Medical Innovation: A Diffusion Study. , 1967 .

[5]  M. Becker,et al.  Sociometric Location and Innovativeness: Reformulation and Extension of the Diffusion Model , 1970 .

[6]  P. Bonacich.  TECHNIQUE FOR ANALYZING OVERLAPPING MEMBERSHIPS , 1972 .

[7]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[8]  L. Freeman,et al.  Centrality in social networks: ii. experimental results☆ , 1979 .

[9]  R. Burt.  Toward a Structural Theory of Action: Network Models of Social Structure , 1985 .

[10]  Thomas J. Peters,et al.  Strategy Follows Structure: Developing Distinctive Skills , 1984 .

[11]  “Golden Parachutes”: A Closer Look , 1984 .

[12]  N. Fligstein,et al.  The spread of the multidivisional form among large firms, 1919–1979 , 1985 .

[13]  Mark S. Granovetter.  Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[14]  Mark S. Granovetter.  Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[15]  David F. Larcker,et al.  Golden parachutes, executive decision-making, and shareholder wealth , 1985 .

[16]  M. C. Jensen,et al.  The Takeover Controversy: Analysis and Evidence , 2003 .

[17]  Coffee,et al.  Shareholders Versus Managers: The Strain in the Corporate Web , 1986 .

[18]  Paul M. Hirsch,et al.  From Ambushes to Golden Parachutes: Corporate Takeovers as an Instance of Cultural Framing and Institutional Integration , 1986, American Journal of Sociology.

[19]  Jitendra V. Singh,et al.  The Ties That Bind: Organizational and Class Bases of Stability in a Corporate Interlock Network , 1986 .

[20]  R. Burt.  Social Contagion and Innovation: Cohesion versus Structural Equivalence , 1987, American Journal of Sociology.

[21]  L. Lowenstein.  What's Wrong With Wall Street: Short-term Gain And The Absentee Shareholder , 1988 .

[22]  Brian G. M. Main,et al.  CEO compensation as tournament and social comparison: A tale of two theories. , 1988 .

[23]  M. Mizruchi.  Similarity of Political Behavior Among Large American Corporations , 1989, American Journal of Sociology.

[24]  Charles A. O'Reilly,et al.  Golden Parachutes: CEOs and the Exercise of Social Influence , 1990 .

[25]  L. Edelman,et al.  Legal Environments and Organizational Governance: The Expansion of Due Process in the American Workplace , 1990, American Journal of Sociology.

[26]  Dimaggio,et al.  Structures of capital : the social organization of the economy , 1990 .

[27]  John L. Campbell,et al.  Property Rights and the Organization of Economic Activity by the State , 1990 .

[28]  S. Mezias.  An Institutional Model of Organizational Practice: Financial Reporting at the Fortune 200 , 1990 .

[29]  Paul DiMaggio,et al.  Structures of Capital: The Social Organization of Economic Life , 1990 .

[30]  Neil Fligstein,et al.  FROM THE TRANSFORMATION OF CORPORATE CONTROL , 2021, The New Economic Sociology.

[31]  Ronald S. Burt,et al.  Interorganization Contagion in Corporate Philanthropy , 1991 .

[32]  G. Davis.  Agents without Principles? The Spread of the Poison Pill through the Intercorporate Network , 1991 .

[33]  L. Zacharias,et al.  The Economic Structure of Corporate Law , 1993 .

[34]  Gerald F. Davis,et al.  Organization Theory and the Market for Corporate Control: A Dynamic Analysis of the Characteristics of Large Takeover Targets, 1980-1990 , 1992 .

[35]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition , 1995, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[36]  L. Edelman,et al.  Legal Ambiguity and Symbolic Structures: Organizational Mediation of Civil Rights Law , 1992, American Journal of Sociology.

[37]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Institutional conditions for diffusion , 1993 .

[38]  Heather A. Haveman.  Follow the leader: Mimetic isomorphism and entry into new markets , 1993 .

[39]  D. Strang,et al.  Spatial and Temporal Heterogeneity in Diffusion , 1993, American Journal of Sociology.

[40]  Frank Dobbin,et al.  Equal Opportunity Law and the Construction of Internal Labor Markets , 1993, American Journal of Sociology.

[41]  Pamela R. Haunschild.  Interorganizational imitation: The impact of interlocks on corporate acquisition activity , 1993 .

[42]  S. Mezias,et al.  The Fragmented State and Due Process Protections in Organizations: The Case of Comparable Worth , 1993 .

[43]  Noah E. Friedkin,et al.  Network Studies of Social Influence , 1993 .

[44]  Margaret M. Blair.  The deal decade : what takeovers and leveraged buyouts mean for corporate governance , 1993 .

[45]  Joel Podolny.  A Status-Based Model of Market Competition , 1993, American Journal of Sociology.

[46]  James D. Westphal,et al.  SUBSTANCE AND SYMBOLISM IN CEOS' LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLANS. , 1993 .

[47]  L. Burns,et al.  Adoption and abandonment of matrix management programs: effects of organizational characteristics and interorganizational networks. , 1993, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[48]  Xueguang Zhou,et al.  Late Adoption of the Multidivisional Form by Large U.S. Corporations: Institutional, Political, and Economic Accounts , 1993 .

[49]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Institutional Environments and Organizations: Structural Complexity and Individualism , 1994 .

[50]  Gerald F. Davis,et al.  The Decline and Fall of the Conglomerate Firm in the 1980s: The Deinstitutionalization of an Organizational Form , 1994 .

[51]  P. Hedström.  Contagious Collectivities: On the Spatial Diffusion of Swedish Trade Unions, 1890-1940 , 1994, American Journal of Sociology.

[52]  Peter G. Klein.  Mergers and the market for corporate control , 1994 .

[53]  Frank Dobbin,et al.  The Legalization of the Workplace , 1994, American Journal of Sociology.

[54]  Edward J. Zajac,et al.  Substance and Symbolism in CEOs' Long-Term Incentive Plans , 1994 .

[55]  Henrich R. Greve,et al.  SPECIFICATION AND ESTIMATION OF HETEROGENEOUS DIFFUSION MODELS , 1995 .

[56]  Henrich R. Greve,et al.  Jumping Ship: The Diffusion of Strategy Abandonment , 1995 .

[57]  Brad M. Barber,et al.  The Friendly and Predatory Acquisition of Large U.S. Corporations in the 1960s: The Other Contested Terrain , 1995 .

[58]  Mark C. Suchman.  Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches , 1995 .

[59]  Toby E. Stuart,et al.  A Role-Based Ecology of Technological Change , 1995, American Journal of Sociology.

[60]  Henrich R. Greve,et al.  Patterns of Competition: The Diffusion of a Market Position in Radio Broadcasting , 1996 .

[61]  Michael Useem,et al.  Investor Capitalism : How Money Managers Are Changing the Face of Corporate America , 1996 .

[62]  M. Mizruchi.  What Do Interlocks Do? An Analysis, Critique, and Assessment of Research on Interlocking Directorates , 1996 .

[63]  W. Scott,et al.  Institutions and Organizations. , 1995 .