Bayesian modeling of dynamic motion integration

The quality of the representation of an object's motion is limited by the noise in the sensory input as well as by an intrinsic ambiguity due to the spatial limitation of the visual motion analyzers (aperture problem). Perceptual and oculomotor data demonstrate that motion processing of extended objects is initially dominated by the local 1D motion cues, related to the object's edges and orthogonal to them, whereas 2D information, related to terminators (or edge-endings), takes progressively over and leads to the final correct representation of global motion. A Bayesian framework accounting for the sensory noise and general expectancies for object velocities has proven successful in explaining several experimental findings concerning early motion processing [Weiss, Y., Adelson, E., 1998. Slow and smooth: a Bayesian theory for the combination of local motion signals in human vision. MIT Technical report, A.I. Memo 1624]. In particular, these models provide a qualitative account for the initial bias induced by the 1D motion cue. However, a complete functional model, encompassing the dynamical evolution of object motion perception, including the integration of different motion cues, is still lacking. Here we outline several experimental observations concerning human smooth pursuit of moving objects and more particularly the time course of its initiation phase, which reflects the ongoing motion integration process. In addition, we propose a recursive extension of the Bayesian model, motivated and constrained by our oculomotor data, to describe the dynamical integration of 1D and 2D motion information. We compare the model predictions for object motion tracking with human oculomotor recordings.

[2]  D. J. WILLSHAW,et al.  Models for the Brain , 1970, Nature.

[3]  M. Shiffrar,et al.  Perceived speed of moving lines depends on orientation, length, speed and luminance , 1993, Vision Research.

[4]  Stephen G. Lisberger,et al.  A model of visually-guided smooth pursuit eye movements based on behavioral observations , 1994, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[5]  Miriam Spering,et al.  Predicting 2D target velocity cannot help 2D motion integration for smooth pursuit initiation. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Noise characteristics and prior expectations in human visual speed perception , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[7]  Pascal Mamassian,et al.  Interaction of visual prior constraints , 2001, Vision Research.

[8]  Brian H Scott,et al.  A comparison of pursuit eye movement and perceptual performance in speed discrimination. , 2003, Journal of vision.

[9]  Rajesh P. N. Rao Bayesian Computation in Recurrent Neural Circuits , 2004, Neural Computation.

[10]  A. Yuille,et al.  Object perception as Bayesian inference. , 2004, Annual review of psychology.

[11]  W. Bialek,et al.  A sensory source for motor variation , 2005, Nature.

[12]  J. L. Gordon,et al.  A model of the smooth pursuit eye movement system , 1986, Biological Cybernetics.

[13]  Christopher C. Pack,et al.  Temporal dynamics of a neural solution to the aperture problem in visual area MT of macaque brain , 2001, Nature.

[14]  Guillaume S Masson,et al.  Object motion computation for the initiation of smooth pursuit eye movements in humans. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  Nicholas J. Priebe,et al.  Estimating Target Speed from the Population Response in Visual Area MT , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  P. Thompson Perceived rate of movement depends on contrast , 1982, Vision Research.

[17]  E. J. Morris,et al.  Visual motion processing and sensory-motor integration for smooth pursuit eye movements. , 1987, Annual review of neuroscience.

[18]  Carlos R. Ponce,et al.  Temporal evolution of 2-dimensional direction signals used to guide eye movements. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  E. Castet,et al.  Temporal dynamics of motion integration for the initiation of tracking eye movements at ultra-short latencies , 2000, Visual Neuroscience.

[20]  Edward H. Adelson,et al.  Motion illusions as optimal percepts , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[21]  William Bialek,et al.  Time Course of Precision in Smooth-Pursuit Eye Movements of Monkeys , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[22]  M. Carandini,et al.  Testing the Bayesian model of perceived speed , 2002, Vision Research.

[23]  Maggie Shiffrar,et al.  The influence of terminators on motion integration across space , 1992, Vision Research.

[24]  D. Long Probabilistic Models of the Brain. , 2002 .

[25]  M. Shiffrar,et al.  Different motion sensitive units are involved in recovering the direction of moving lines , 1993, Vision Research.

[26]  H. Collewijn,et al.  Precise recording of human eye movements , 1975, Vision Research.

[27]  E. Adelson,et al.  Slow and Smooth: A Bayesian theory for the combination of local motion signals in human vision , 1998 .

[28]  L. Stone,et al.  From following edges to pursuing objects. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[29]  David J. Fleet,et al.  Velocity Likelihoods in Biological and Machine Vision , 2001 .

[30]  Heiko Neumann,et al.  Disambiguating Visual Motion Through Contextual Feedback Modulation , 2004, Neural Computation.

[31]  T. Albright Direction and orientation selectivity of neurons in visual area MT of the macaque. , 1984, Journal of neurophysiology.

[32]  S G Lisberger,et al.  Effect of changing feedback delay on spontaneous oscillations in smooth pursuit eye movements of monkeys. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.