Space to think: large high-resolution displays for sensemaking

Space supports human cognitive abilities in a myriad of ways. The note attached to the side of the monitor, the papers spread out on the desk, diagrams scrawled on a whiteboard, and even the keys left out on the counter are all examples of using space to recall, reveal relationships, and think. Technological advances have made it possible to construct large display environments in which space has real meaning. This paper examines how increased space affects the way displays are regarded and used within the context of the cognitively demanding task of sensemaking. A pair of studies were conducted demonstrating how the spatial environment supports sensemaking by becoming part of the distributed cognitive process, providing both external memory and a semantic layer.

[1]  Alexander W. Skaburskis,et al.  The Sandbox for analysis: concepts and methods , 2006, CHI.

[2]  Richards J. Heuer,et al.  Psychology of Intelligence Analysis , 1999 .

[3]  Anthony C. Robinson,et al.  Design for synthesis in geovisualization , 2008 .

[4]  James D. Hollan,et al.  Distributed cognition: toward a new foundation for human-computer interaction research , 2000, TCHI.

[5]  Frank M. Shipman,et al.  Formality Considered Harmful: Experiences, Emerging Themes, and Directions on the Use of Formal Representations in Interactive Systems , 1999, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[6]  Chris North,et al.  Shaping the Display of the Future: The Effects of Display Size and Curvature on User Performance and Insights , 2009, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[7]  Daniel C. Richardson,et al.  Representation, space and Hollywood Squares: looking at things that aren't there anymore , 2000, Cognition.

[8]  Jiajie Zhang,et al.  The Nature of External Representations in Problem Solving , 1997, Cogn. Sci..

[9]  David Kirsh,et al.  The Intelligent Use of Space , 1995, Artif. Intell..

[10]  Desney S. Tan,et al.  Physically large displays improve performance on spatial tasks , 2006, TCHI.

[11]  Chris North,et al.  Move to improve: promoting physical navigation to increase user performance with large displays , 2007, CHI.

[12]  James J. Thomas,et al.  Visualizing the non-visual: spatial analysis and interaction with information from text documents , 1995, Proceedings of Visualization 1995 Conference.

[13]  Malcolm Slaney,et al.  Being Literate with Large Document Collections: Observational Studies and Cost Structure Tradeoffs , 2006, Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'06).

[14]  Frank M. Shipman,et al.  The visual knowledge builder: a second generation spatial hypertext , 2001, HYPERTEXT '01.

[15]  Mary Czerwinski,et al.  Display space usage and window management operation comparisons between single monitor and multiple monitor users , 2004, AVI.

[16]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  Partitioning digital worlds: focal and peripheral awareness in multiple monitor use , 2001, CHI.

[17]  Ravin Balakrishnan,et al.  Keepin' it real: pushing the desktop metaphor with physics, piles and the pen , 2006, CHI.

[18]  P. Pirolli,et al.  The Sensemaking Process and Leverage Points for Analyst Technology as Identified Through Cognitive Task Analysis , 2007 .

[19]  Ted Boren,et al.  Thinking aloud: reconciling theory and practice , 2000 .

[20]  Desney S. Tan,et al.  The large-display user experience , 2005, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[21]  Ted Boren,et al.  Thinking aloud: reconciling theory and practice , 2000 .

[22]  Mary Czerwinski,et al.  Toward Characterizing the Productivity Benefits of Very Large Displays , 2003, INTERACT.

[23]  Desney S. Tan,et al.  Women take a wider view , 2002, CHI.

[24]  Jean Scholtz,et al.  Evaluating Visual Analytics at the 2007 VAST Symposium Contest , 2008, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[25]  Frank M. Shipman,et al.  Finding and using implicit structure in human-organized spatial layouts of information , 1995, CHI '95.