Information access: Toward a more robust conceptualization

Information access is implicated in multiple research areas in library and information science (LIS). This paper argues that information access should receive more explicit attention from researchers. First, the two predominant conceptualizations of information access are examined and synthesized, noting the particular strengths and weaknesses of each. Next, the paper illustrates the centrality of information access by examining several LIS research areas; this explication demonstrates that information access is an important, though often implicit, concern of LIS researchers. Information access is studied across several research areas, but these typically remain isolated and unconnected. By integrating multiple analytical approaches to information access, this paper improves upon the current understanding of information access. The brief examination of information access suggests that a more refined framework, incorporating additional dimensions, would be fruitful, both to promote research into information access and to better integrate disparate research streams. This paper has three goals: to draw attention to the centrality of information access across LIS, to incorporate multiple research streams' perspectives on information access, and to suggest further refinements to the study of information access.

[1]  Loriano Bonora Electronic Scholarly Publishing and Open Access , 2005 .

[2]  Leah A. Lievrouw,et al.  Information and equity , 2005, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[3]  Noriko Hara,et al.  Digital access to government information: To what extent are agencies in compliance with EFOIA? , 2007, ASIST.

[4]  G. Burnett,et al.  Information Access and Exchange among Small Worlds in a Democratic Society: The Role of Policy in Shaping Information Behavior in the Post‐9/11 United States , 2005, The Library Quarterly.

[5]  Kristin R. Eschenfelder,et al.  Behind the Web site: An inside look at the production of Web-based textual government information , 2004, Gov. Inf. Q..

[6]  Kristin R. Eschenfelder,et al.  How do government agencies review and approve text content for publication on their Web sites? A framework to compare Web content management practices , 2004 .

[8]  M. H. Grunewald,et al.  E-FOIA and the "Mother of All Complaints:" Information Delivery and Delay Reduction , 1997 .

[9]  Charles N. Davis Electronic Access to Information and the Privacy Paradox , 2001, ArXiv.

[10]  R. Fidel,et al.  Conceptual Frameworks in Information Behavior. , 2001 .

[11]  Massimo Craglia,et al.  Access to Public-Sector Information in Europe: Policy, Rights, and Obligations , 2006, Inf. Soc..

[12]  Paul T. Jaeger,et al.  Information policy, information access, and democratic participation: The national and international implications of the Bush administration's information politics , 2007, Gov. Inf. Q..

[13]  Priscilla M. Regan,et al.  Crafting the message: Controlling content on agency Web sites , 2007, Gov. Inf. Q..

[14]  Peter Johan Lor,et al.  Is a knowledge society possible without freedom of access to information? , 2007, J. Inf. Sci..

[15]  Laurie J. Bonnici,et al.  Beyond the FAQ: Explicit and implicit norms in Usenet newsgroups , 2003 .

[16]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  Trends in Analyzing Access to Information. Part II: Unique and Integrating Conceptualizations , 1999, Inf. Process. Manag..

[17]  Paul T. Jaeger,et al.  Small worlds, lifeworlds, and information: the ramifications of the information behaviour of social groups in public policy and the public sphere , 2008, Inf. Res..

[18]  Lisa S. Nickum,et al.  Elusive No Longer? Increasing Accessibility to the Federally Funded Technical Report Literature , 2006 .

[19]  Leah A. Lievrouw,et al.  The Information Environment and Universal Service , 2000, Inf. Soc..

[20]  Lotte E. Feinberg,et al.  FOIA, federal information policy, and information availability in a post-9/11 world , 2004, Gov. Inf. Q..

[21]  J. Balkin Digital Speech and Democratic Culture: a Theory of Freedom of Expression for the Information Society , 2003 .

[22]  Chris Matz,et al.  Libraries and the USA PATRIOT Act: Values in Conflict , 2008 .

[23]  P. Jaeger,et al.  Social Information Behavior and the Democratic Process: Information Poverty, Normative Behavior, and Electronic Government in the United States , 2004 .

[24]  G. Burnett,et al.  Normative behavior and information: The social aspects of information access , 2008 .

[25]  Fytton Rowland,et al.  The citation advantage of open-access articles , 2008 .

[26]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  Trends in Analyzing Access to Information. Part I: Cross-Disciplinary Conceptualizations of Access , 1999, Inf. Process. Manag..

[27]  Louise Cooke,et al.  Controlling the net: European approaches to content and access regulation , 2007, J. Inf. Sci..

[28]  E. Chatman,et al.  Small worlds: normative behavior in virtual communities and feminist bookselling , 2001 .

[29]  C. McClure The Federal technical report literature: Research needs and issues , 1988 .

[30]  Wanda V. Dole,et al.  Values for librarians in the information age: an expanded examination , 2000 .