Control Force Compensation in Ground-Based Flight Simulators

This paper presents the results of a study that investigated if controller force compensations accounting for the inertial forces and moments due to the aircraft motion during flight have a significant effect on pilot control behavior and performance. Seven rotorcraft pilots performed a side-step and precision hovering task in light turbulence in the Vertical Motion Simulator. The effects of force compensation were examined for two different simulated rotorcraft: linear and UH-60 dynamics with two different force gradients of the lateral stick control. Fourmotion configurations were used: large motion, hexapod motion, fixed-base motion, and fixed-base motion with compensation. Control-input variables and task performance, such as the time to translate to the designated hover position, station-keeping position errors, and handling qualities ratings, were used as measures. Control force compensation enabled pilot control behavior and performance more similar to that under highor medium-fidelity motion to some extent only. Control force compensation did not improve overall task performance considering both rotorcraft models at the same time. The control force compensation had effects on the linear model with lighter force gradient, but only a minimal effect on pilots’ control behavior and task performance for the UH-60 model, which had a higher force gradient. This suggests that the control force compensation has limited benefits for controllers that have higher stiffness.

[1]  A. R. Jonckheere,et al.  A DISTRIBUTION-FREE k-SAMPLE TEST AGAINST ORDERED ALTERNATIVES , 1954 .

[2]  F R Alex,et al.  Experiments and a model for pilot dynamics with visual and motion inputs. NASA CR-1325. , 1969, NASA contractor report. NASA CR. United States. National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

[3]  Chris L. Blanken,et al.  Investigation of the effects of bandwidth and time delay on helicopter roll-axis handling qualities , 1994 .

[4]  J. Ware,et al.  Random-effects models for longitudinal data. , 1982, Biometrics.

[5]  J. B. Sinacori.  The determination of some requirements for a helicopter flight research simulation facility , 1977 .

[6]  Richard S. Bray.  Visual and motion cueing in helicopter simulation , 1985 .

[7]  David G. Mitchell,et al.  Feel Systems and Flying Qualities , 1995 .

[8]  Mark G. Ballin.  Validation of a real-time engineering simulation of the UH-60A helicopter , 1987 .

[9]  A. M. Junker,et al.  Roll tracking effects of G-vector tilt and various types of motion washout , 1978 .

[10]  Jeffery A. Schroeder,et al.  Helicopter flight simulation motion platform requirements , 1998 .

[11]  Carl R. Ott,et al.  In Flight Evaluation of Active Inceptor Force-Feel Characteristics and Handling Qualities , 2012 .

[12]  George E. Cooper,et al.  The use of pilot rating in the evaluation of aircraft handling qualities , 1969 .

[13]  Jeffery A. Schroeder,et al.  Effects of stick dynamics on helicopter flying qualities , 1990 .