Exploring Applicant Pool Quantity and Quality: The Effects of Early Recruitment Practice Strategies, Corporate Advertising, and Firm Reputation

Drawing on marketing and recruitment theory, we examined relationships among early recruitment practices, organizational factors, and organization-level recruitment outcomes, predicting that low-involvement recruitment practices, high-involvement recruitment practices, corporate advertising, and firm reputation would positively affect the quantity and quality of organizations' applicant pools. We also predicted that corporate advertising and firm reputation would moderate the effects of the 2 recruitment strategies. Data for 99 organizations collected from multiple sources provided some evidence that early recruitment practices, corporate advertising, and firm reputation each had direct effects on applicant pool quantity and quality. More importantly, we found that low-involvement recruitment practices were more effective for firms with relatively low levels of corporate advertising and firm reputation, whereas high-involvement recruitment practices were more effective for firms with relatively high levels of advertising and reputation.

[1]  S. Rynes,et al.  The Importance of Recruitment in Job Choice: A Different Way of Looking , 2006 .

[2]  D. Cable,et al.  Firm reputation and applicant pool characteristics , 2003 .

[3]  C. Stevens,et al.  The relationship between early recruitment-related activities and the application decisions of new labor-market entrants: a brand equity approach to recruitment. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[4]  T. Kamber.  The brand manager's dilemma: Understanding how advertising expenditures affect sales growth during a recession , 2002 .

[5]  Kevin D. Carlson,et al.  RECRUITMENT EVALUATION: THE CASE FOR ASSESSING THE QUALITY OF APPLICANTS ATTRACTED , 2002 .

[6]  Daniel M. Cable,et al.  Establishing the dimensions, sources and value of job seekers' employer knowledge during recruitment , 2001 .

[7]  R. Chandy,et al.  What to Say When: Advertising Appeals in Evolving Markets , 2001 .

[8]  Elizabeth Chambers,et al.  The war for talent , 2001, Tijdschrift voor HRM.

[9]  Edward G. Michaels,et al.  The War For Talent , 2001 .

[10]  Daniel B. Turban,et al.  Organizational Attractiveness as an Employer on College Campuses: An Examination of the Applicant Population , 2001 .

[11]  Michael M. Harris.  Winning the Talent War , 2001 .

[12]  Patrick M. Wright,et al.  MEASUREMENT ERROR IN RESEARCH ON THE HUMAN RESOURCES AND FIRM PERFORMANCE RELATIONSHIP: FURTHER EVIDENCE AND ANALYSIS , 2000 .

[13]  A. Dohm,et al.  Gauging the Labor Force Effects of Retiring Baby-Boomers , 2000 .

[14]  M. Taylor,et al.  Organizational Recruitment: Enhancing the Intersection of Research and Practice , 2000 .

[15]  Michel Tuan Pham,et al.  Relatedness, Prominence, and Constructive Sponsor Identification , 1999 .

[16]  K. Moser,et al.  Recruiting Employees. Individual and Organisational Perspectives , 1998 .

[17]  D. MacInnis,et al.  The Effects of Incidental Ad Exposure on the Formation of Consideration Sets , 1997 .

[18]  Naveen Donthu,et al.  Brand Equity, Brand Preference, and Purchase Intent , 1995 .

[19]  D. Aaker.  Building Strong Brands , 1995 .

[20]  T. Judge,et al.  PAY PREFERENCES AND JOB SEARCH DECISIONS: A PERSON-ORGANIZATION FIT PERSPECTIVE , 1994 .

[21]  Alison E. Barber,et al.  Job Postings and the Decision to Interview: A Verbal Protocol Analysis , 1993 .

[22]  Mary A. Gowan,et al.  Corporate Image, Recruitment Image And Initial Job Choice Decisions , 1993 .

[23]  Kevin Lane Keller.  Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Managing Customer-Based Brand Equity , 1993 .

[24]  R. Vandenberg,et al.  Placing recruiting effectiveness in perspective: A cognitive explication of the job-choice and organizational-entry period , 1992 .

[25]  Bernard J. Jaworski,et al.  Enhancing and Measuring Consumers’ Motivation, Opportunity, and Ability to Process Brand Information from Ads , 1991 .

[26]  Gerard J. Tellis,et al.  An Analysis of the Tradeoff between Advertising and Price Discounting , 1991 .

[27]  S. Rynes,et al.  Applicant Attraction Strategies: An Organizational Perspective , 1990 .

[28]  Bernard J. Jaworski,et al.  Information Processing from Advertisements: Toward an Integrative Framework , 1989 .

[29]  S. Rynes.  Recruitment, Job Choice, and Post-Hire Consequences: A Call For New Research Directions , 1989 .

[30]  Fred A. Mael,et al.  Social identity theory and the organization , 1989 .

[31]  Franziska Marquart,et al.  Communication and persuasion : central and peripheral routes to attitude change , 1988 .

[32]  K. Murphy.  "When your top choice turns you down: Effect of rejected offers on the utility of selection tests": Correction to Murphy. , 1987 .

[33]  John W. Boudreau,et al.  College Recruiting in Large Organizations: Practice, Evaluation, and Research Implications. , 1986 .

[34]  N. Mason,et al.  Effectiveness of Specificity in Recruitment Advertising , 1986 .

[35]  Kevin R. Murphy,et al.  When your top choice turns you down: Effect of rejected offers on the utility of selection tests. , 1986 .

[36]  John W. Boudreau,et al.  Role of recruitment in staffing utility analysis. , 1985 .

[37]  John J. Lawler,et al.  A policy-capturing investigation of the role of expectancies in decisions to pursue job alternatives. , 1983 .

[38]  Joseph G. P. Paolillo,et al.  The Influence of Corporate Image and Specificity of Candidate Qualifications on Response to Recruitment Advertisement , 1982 .

[39]  H. Tajfel.  Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations , 1982 .

[40]  Jerry C. Olson,et al.  Are Product Attribute Beliefs the Only Mediator of Advertising Effects on Brand Attitude? , 1981 .