Prediction of delayed renal allograft function using an artificial neural network.

BACKGROUND Delayed graft function (DGF) is one of the most important complications in the post-transplant period, having an adverse effect on both the immediate and long-term graft survival. In this study, an artificial neural network was used to predict the occurrence of DGF and compared with traditional logistical regression models for prediction of DGF. METHODS A total of 304 cadaveric renal transplants performed at the Jewish Hospital, Louisville were included in the study. Covariate analysis by artificial neural networks and traditional logistical regression were done to predict the occurrence of DGF. RESULTS The incidence of DGF in this study was 38%. Logistic regression analysis was more sensitive to prediction of no DGF (91 vs 70%), while the neural network was more sensitive to prediction of yes for DGF (56 vs 37%). Overall prediction accuracy for both logistic regression and the neural network was 64 and 63%, respectively. Logistic regression was 36.5% sensitive and 90.7% specific. The neural network was 63.5% sensitive and 64.8% specific. The only covariate with a P < 0.001 was the transplant of a white donor kidney to a black recipient. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to test for the negative effect of DGF on long-term graft survival. One year graft survival in patients without DGF was 92 +/- 2% vs 81 +/- 3% in patients with DGF. The 5-year graft survival was not affected by DGF in this study. CONCLUSION Artificial neural networks may be used for prediction of DGF in cadaveric renal transplants. This method is more sensitive but less specific than logistic regression methods.

[1]  Delayed function reduces renal allograft survival independent of acute rejection. , 1996, Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association.

[2]  R. Howard,et al.  Delayed graft function after renal transplantation. , 1998, Transplantation.

[3]  J. H. van Bockel,et al.  Risk factors for delayed graft function in cadaveric kidney transplantation: a prospective study of renal function and graft survival after preservation with University of Wisconsin solution in multi-organ donors. European Multicenter Study Group. , 1997, Transplantation.

[4]  A. Zwinderman,et al.  Delayed graft function influences renal function but not survival. , 2000, Transplantation proceedings.

[5]  T. Cacciarelli,et al.  The influence of delayed renal allograft function on long-term outcome in the cyclosporine era. , 1993, Clinical nephrology.

[6]  Apostolos Nikolaos Refenes,et al.  Currency exchange rate prediction and neural network design strategies , 1993, Neural Computing & Applications.

[7]  J. Soulillou,et al.  Delayed graft function of more than six days strongly decreases long-term survival of transplanted kidneys. , 1998, Kidney international.

[8]  W K Vaughn,et al.  THE DETRIMENTAL EFFECTS OF DELAYED GRAFT FUNCTION IN CADAVER DONOR RENAL TRANSPLANTATION , 1984, Transplantation.

[9]  R. Vanholder,et al.  Delayed graft function in renal transplantation , 2004, Current opinion in critical care.

[10]  P. Halloran,et al.  Delayed graft function in renal transplantation: etiology, management and long-term significance. , 1996, The Journal of urology.

[11]  J. Berlin,et al.  Race and delayed kidney allograft function. , 1998, Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association.

[12]  Robert J. Marks,et al.  Electric load forecasting using an artificial neural network , 1991 .

[13]  Saumen Majumdar,et al.  Electric Load Forecasting Using Artificial Neural Networks and Deficit Management , 1997 .

[14]  E. McGuire This month in Investigative Urology. Commentary on antibody production in response to collagen injection. , 1996, The Journal of urology.

[15]  A. Matas,et al.  Economic impact of delayed graft function. , 1991, Transplantation proceedings.

[16]  W. Baxt Use of an artificial neural network for the diagnosis of myocardial infarction. , 1991, Annals of internal medicine.

[17]  Tao Xiong,et al.  A combined SVM and LDA approach for classification , 2005, Proceedings. 2005 IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, 2005..

[18]  A. Matas,et al.  Delayed graft function, acute rejection, and outcome after cadaver renal transplantation. The multivariate analysis. , 1995, Transplantation.

[19]  Kazuo Asakawa,et al.  Stock market prediction system with modular neural networks , 1990, 1990 IJCNN International Joint Conference on Neural Networks.

[20]  R. Wolfe,et al.  Delayed graft function: risk factors and implications for renal allograft survival. , 1997, Transplantation.

[21]  G. Danovitch,et al.  The high cost of delayed graft function in cadaveric renal transplantation. , 1991, Transplantation.