CHAPTER 9 – Techniques and variables in visual field testing

[1]  G. Skuta,et al.  Effects of pupillary constriction on automated perimetry in normal eyes. , 1989, Ophthalmology.

[2]  J Flammer,et al.  Influence of age on the visual fields of normal subjects. , 1986, American journal of ophthalmology.

[3]  E. Werner,et al.  Effect of patient experience on the results of automated perimetry in glaucoma suspect patients. , 1990, Ophthalmology.

[4]  L. Remington,et al.  Pupillary dilation and its effects on automated perimetry results. , 1995, Journal of the American Optometric Association.

[5]  J. Wild,et al.  Fatigue effects during a single session of automated static threshold perimetry. , 1994, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[6]  W. C. Stewart Static versus kinetic testing in the nasal peripheral field in patients with glaucoma , 1992, Acta ophthalmologica.

[7]  R. Weinreb,et al.  The effect of refractive correction on automated perimetric thresholds. , 1986, American journal of ophthalmology.

[8]  Development of a Visual Field Screening Test Using a Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer , 1985 .

[9]  M. F. Armaly Ocular pressure and visual fields. A ten-year follow-up study. , 1969, Archives of ophthalmology.

[10]  K Rohrschneider,et al.  Stability of fixation: results of fundus-controlled examination using the scanning laser ophthalmoscope. , 1995, German journal of ophthalmology.

[11]  Josef Flammer,et al.  The learning and fatigue effect in automated perimetry , 2004, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[12]  G. Jaffe,et al.  Age-related changes of the normal visual field. , 1986, Archives of ophthalmology.

[13]  Byron L. Lam,et al.  Effect of cataract on automated perimetry. , 1991, Ophthalmology.

[14]  A. Heijl,et al.  Appearance of the pattern deviation map as a function of change in area of localized field loss. , 2004, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[15]  T. Suie The role of isoallergies in the production of experimental uveitis , 2004, Documenta Ophthalmologica.

[16]  P. O'Connor,et al.  The effect of pilocarpine on the visual field in normals. , 1986, Ophthalmology.

[17]  W. Feuer,et al.  Pseudo-loss of fixation in automated perimetry. , 1991, Ophthalmology.

[18]  W. Feuer,et al.  The effect of simulated cataract on the glaucomatous visual field. , 1993, Ophthalmology.

[19]  B Becker,et al.  Peripheral nasal field defects. , 1971, American journal of ophthalmology.

[20]  J Katz,et al.  Evaluation of nerve fiber layer assessment. , 1984, Archives of ophthalmology.

[21]  H Bebie,et al.  STATIC PERIMETRY: ACCURACY AND FLUCTUATIONS , 1976, Acta ophthalmologica.

[22]  B. Gloor,et al.  Long-term fluctuations versus actual field loss in glaucoma patients. , 1985, Developments in ophthalmology.

[23]  G. Trick,et al.  Assessing the utility of reliability indices for automated visual fields. Testing ocular hypertensives. , 1989, Ophthalmology.

[24]  L. Johnson,et al.  Effect of intermittent versus continuous patient monitoring on reliability indices during automated perimetry. , 1993, Ophthalmology.

[25]  J Flammer,et al.  Quantification of glaucomatous visual field defects with automated perimetry. , 1985, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[26]  C. Johnson,et al.  A prospective three-year study of response properties of normal subjects and patients during automated perimetry. , 1993, Ophthalmology.

[27]  William J Feuer,et al.  Sensitivity and specificity of the Swedish interactive threshold algorithm for glaucomatous visual field defects. , 2002, Ophthalmology.

[28]  S. Drance,et al.  A screening method for temporal visual defects in chronic simple glaucoma. , 1972, Canadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie.

[29]  F. Fankhauser,et al.  Differential light threshold in automated static perimetry. Factors influencing short-term fluctuation. , 1984, Archives of ophthalmology.

[30]  J L Keltner,et al.  Variability of quantitative automated perimetry in normal observers. , 1986, Ophthalmology.

[31]  J. Caprioli,et al.  The influence of patient reliability on visual field outcome. , 1994, American journal of ophthalmology.

[32]  B. Joondeph,et al.  Variation in visual field measurements with an automated perimeter. , 1984, American journal of ophthalmology.

[33]  N. Garber Tangent screen perimetry (continuing education credit). , 1994, Journal of ophthalmic nursing & technology.

[34]  E. Werner,et al.  Peripheral nasal field defects in glaucoma. , 1979, Ophthalmology.

[35]  B. Bengtsson,et al.  The effect of perimetric experience in patients with glaucoma. , 1996, Archives of ophthalmology.

[36]  M. F. Armaly Selective perimetry for glaucomatous defects in ocular hypertension. , 1972, Archives of ophthalmology.

[37]  A. Investigators The advanced glaucoma intervention study, 6: effect of cataract on visual field and visual acuity. The AGIS Investigators. , 2000, Archives of ophthalmology.

[38]  S. Drance,et al.  JO and STATJO: programs for investigating the visual field with the Octopus automatic perimeter. , 1983, Canadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie.

[39]  H. Hayashi,et al.  Influence of cataract surgery on automated perimetry in patients with glaucoma. , 2001, American journal of ophthalmology.

[40]  J Katz,et al.  Reliability indexes of automated perimetric tests. , 1988, Archives of ophthalmology.

[41]  J M Wild,et al.  Long‐term follow‐up of baseline learning and fatigue effects in the automated perimetry of glaucoma and ocular hypertensive patients , 1991, Acta ophthalmologica.

[42]  Anders Heijl,et al.  The Location of Earliest Glaucomatous Visual Field Defects Documented by Automatic Perimetry , 1983 .

[43]  D. Echelman,et al.  Peripheral visual field testing in glaucoma by automated kinetic perimetry with the Humphrey Field Analyzer. , 1992, Archives of ophthalmology.

[44]  J Flammer,et al.  Differential light threshold. Short- and long-term fluctuation in patients with glaucoma, normal controls, and patients with suspected glaucoma. , 1984, Archives of ophthalmology.

[45]  J Katz,et al.  A longitudinal study of the age-adjusted variability of automated visual fields. , 1987, Archives of ophthalmology.

[46]  M G Gressel,et al.  The influence of refraction accuracy on automated perimetric threshold measurements. , 1987, Ophthalmology.

[47]  R W West Standardization of the tangent screen examination: some neglected parameters. , 1988, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[48]  R. Klein,et al.  Visual sensitivity and age-related eye diseases. The Beaver Dam Eye Study. , 1996, Ophthalmic epidemiology.

[49]  E. Werner,et al.  Effect of patient experience on the results of automated perimetry in clinically stable glaucoma patients. , 1988, Ophthalmology.

[50]  S. Drance,et al.  The Estimation and Testing of the Components of Long-Term Fluctuation of the Differential Light Threshold , 1983 .

[51]  T. Berg,et al.  Psychological Factors in Computer Assisted Perimetry; Automatic and Semi-Automatic Perimetry , 1985 .

[52]  F. Furuno,et al.  Early Stage Progression in Glaucomatous Visual Field Changes , 1979 .

[53]  A K Sharma,et al.  Comparison of the Humphrey Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm (SITA) and Full Threshold Strategies , 2000, Journal of glaucoma.

[54]  Chris A. Johnson,et al.  Comparison of glaucomatous visual field defects using standard full threshold and Swedish interactive threshold algorithms. , 2002, Archives of ophthalmology.

[55]  M Eizenman,et al.  Stability of fixation in healthy subjects during automated perimetry. , 1992, Canadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie.

[56]  S. Drance,et al.  Visual field screening in glaucoma. An evaluation of the Armaly technique for screening glaucomatous visual fields. , 1973, Archives of ophthalmology.

[57]  R. Parrish,et al.  Static and kinetic visual field testing. Reproducibility in normal volunteers. , 1984, Archives of ophthalmology.

[58]  R. Weinreb,et al.  The effect of refractive error on automated global analysis program G-1. , 1987, American journal of ophthalmology.

[59]  M Fingeret Clinical alternative for reducing the time needed to perform automated threshold perimetry. , 1995, Journal of the American Optometric Association.

[60]  J Katz,et al.  Asymmetry and variation in the normal hill of vision. , 1986, Archives of ophthalmology.

[61]  Chris A. Johnson,et al.  Structure and function evaluation (SAFE): I. criteria for glaucomatous visual field loss using standard automated perimetry (SAP) and short wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP). , 2002, American journal of ophthalmology.

[62]  S M Drance,et al.  Early visual field disturbances in glaucoma. , 1977, Archives of ophthalmology.