Efficient Z gates for quantum computing

For superconducting qubits, microwave pulses drive rotations around the Bloch sphere. The phase of these drives can be used to generate zero-duration arbitrary virtual $Z$ gates, which, combined with two ${X}_{\ensuremath{\pi}/2}$ gates, can generate any SU(2) gate. Here we show how to best utilize these virtual $Z$ gates to both improve algorithms and correct pulse errors. We perform randomized benchmarking using a Clifford set of Hadamard and $Z$ gates and show that the error per Clifford is reduced versus a set consisting of standard finite-duration $X$ and $Y$ gates. $Z$ gates can correct unitary rotation errors for weakly anharmonic qubits as an alternative to pulse-shaping techniques such as derivative removal by adiabatic gate (DRAG). We investigate leakage and show that a combination of DRAG pulse shaping to minimize leakage and $Z$ gates to correct rotation errors realizes a 13.3 ns ${X}_{\ensuremath{\pi}/2}$ gate characterized by low error $[1.95(3)\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}4}]$ and low leakage $[3.1(6)\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}6}]$. Ultimately leakage is limited by the finite temperature of the qubit, but this limit is two orders of magnitude smaller than pulse errors due to decoherence.

[1]  R. Martinez,et al.  An algorithmic benchmark for quantum information processing , 2000, Nature.

[2]  E. Knill,et al.  Randomized Benchmarking of Quantum Gates , 2007, 0707.0963.

[3]  S. Girvin,et al.  Charge-insensitive qubit design derived from the Cooper pair box , 2007, cond-mat/0703002.

[4]  L. DiCarlo,et al.  Demonstration of two-qubit algorithms with a superconducting quantum processor , 2009, Nature.

[5]  J M Gambetta,et al.  Simple pulses for elimination of leakage in weakly nonlinear qubits. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[6]  Erik Lucero,et al.  Reduced phase error through optimized control of a superconducting qubit , 2010, 1007.1690.

[7]  Luigi Frunzio,et al.  Optimized driving of superconducting artificial atoms for improved single-qubit gates , 2010 .

[8]  J. M. Gambetta,et al.  Optimal control methods for rapidly time-varying Hamiltonians , 2011, 1102.0584.

[9]  Blake R. Johnson,et al.  Simple all-microwave entangling gate for fixed-frequency superconducting qubits. , 2011, Physical review letters.

[10]  J. M. Gambetta,et al.  Analytic control methods for high-fidelity unitary operations in a weakly nonlinear oscillator , 2010, 1011.1949.

[11]  Joseph Emerson,et al.  Scalable and robust randomized benchmarking of quantum processes. , 2010, Physical review letters.

[12]  M Steffen,et al.  Efficient measurement of quantum gate error by interleaved randomized benchmarking. , 2012, Physical review letters.

[13]  Austin G. Fowler,et al.  Coping with qubit leakage in topological codes , 2013, 1308.6642.

[14]  R. Barends,et al.  Superconducting quantum circuits at the surface code threshold for fault tolerance , 2014, Nature.

[15]  Shelby Kimmel,et al.  Demonstration of robust quantum gate tomography via randomized benchmarking , 2015, 1505.06686.

[16]  Andrew W. Cross,et al.  Leakage suppression in the toric code , 2014, 2015 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT).

[17]  J. Gambetta,et al.  Procedure for systematically tuning up cross-talk in the cross-resonance gate , 2016, 1603.04821.

[18]  Jay M. Gambetta,et al.  Universal Gate for Fixed-Frequency Qubits via a Tunable Bus , 2016, 1604.03076.

[19]  Zijun Chen,et al.  Measuring and Suppressing Quantum State Leakage in a Superconducting Qubit. , 2015, Physical review letters.

[20]  Jay M. Gambetta,et al.  Quantification and characterization of leakage errors , 2017, 1704.03081.