Merely Being with you Increases My Attention to Luxury Products: Using EEG to Understand Consumers’ Emotional Experience with Luxury Branded Products

Electrophysiological and hemodynamic studies provide substantial evidence of dissimilar brain responses when people view emotional compared with neutral pictures. This study investigates consumer brain responses underpinning passive viewing of luxury (high emotional value) versus basic (low emotional value) branded products when participants are alone or with another person. Conforming to social facilitation theory and using electroencephalogram methods, the authors recorded event-related potentials while female participants passively viewed pictures of luxury and basic branded products. They examined event-related-potential amplitudes in three time windows, corresponding to the P2 and P3 components and the late positive potential (LPP). Dissimilar brain responses occurred in the Together but not the Alone condition for the P2 and P3 components over visual cortex sites. The LPP amplitude was higher for luxury than for basic branded products, but only in the Together condition, suggesting that the presence of another person magnifies the emotional effect of brand type. Taken together, the results suggest that LPP amplitude during passive viewing of relevant marketing images reflects increased attention allocation and motivational significance, both enhanced by the presence of another person, to stimuli with higher emotional value.

[1]  Hilke Plassmann,et al.  Branding the brain: A critical review and outlook , 2012 .

[2]  Robert B. Cialdini,et al.  Images of Success and the Preference for Luxury Brands , 2006 .

[3]  Jennifer C. Britton,et al.  Facial expressions and complex IAPS pictures: Common and differential networks , 2006, NeuroImage.

[4]  A. Angrilli,et al.  Visual evoked potentials, heart rate responses and memory to emotional pictorial stimuli. , 1997, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[5]  Rebecca Walker Naylor,et al.  Beyond the “Like” Button: The Impact of Mere Virtual Presence on Brand Evaluations and Purchase Intentions in Social Media Settings , 2012 .

[6]  M. Bradley,et al.  Brain potentials in affective picture processing: covariation with autonomic arousal and affective report , 2000, Biological Psychology.

[7]  Emily B. Falk,et al.  Predicting Persuasion-Induced Behavior Change from the Brain , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  T. Robbins.  Arousal systems and attentional processes , 1997, Biological Psychology.

[9]  Jennifer J. Argo,et al.  The Influence of Friends on Consumer Spending: The Role of Agency–Communion Orientation and Self-Monitoring , 2010 .

[10]  G. Laurent,et al.  The Functions of Luxury: A Situational Approach to Excursionism , 1996 .

[11]  S. Nieuwenhuis,et al.  Reappraisal modulates the electrocortical response to unpleasant pictures , 2006, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[12]  S. Sara.  The locus coeruleus and noradrenergic modulation of cognition , 2009, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[13]  M. Bradley,et al.  Emotion and the motivational brain , 2010, Biological Psychology.

[14]  Katherine N. Lemon,et al.  Customer Engagement Behavior: Theoretical Foundations and Research Directions , 2010 .

[15]  Jonas K. Olofsson,et al.  Affective picture processing: An integrative review of ERP findings , 2008, Biological Psychology.

[16]  G. Soutar,et al.  Consumer perceived value: The development of a multiple item scale , 2001 .

[17]  M. Bradley,et al.  Fleeting images: a new look at early emotion discrimination. , 2001, Psychophysiology.

[18]  Yul-Wan Sung,et al.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging , 2004, Scholarpedia.

[19]  Markus Junghöfer,et al.  Selective Visual Attention to Emotion , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[20]  Peter J. Lang,et al.  Parallel amygdala and inferotemporal activation reflect emotional intensity and fear relevance , 2005, NeuroImage.

[21]  Greg Hajcak,et al.  Attending to affect: appraisal strategies modulate the electrocortical response to arousing pictures. , 2006, Emotion.

[22]  David W. Stewart,et al.  Speculations on the Future of Advertising Research , 1992 .

[23]  Joseph C. Nunes,et al.  Signaling Status with Luxury Goods: The Role of Brand Prominence , 2010 .

[24]  A. Gutchess,et al.  A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study of Neural Dissociations between Brand and Person Judgments , 2006 .

[25]  D. Ariely,et al.  Neuromarketing: the hope and hype of neuroimaging in business , 2010, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[26]  A. Muñiz,et al.  How Brand Community Practices Create Value , 2009 .

[27]  G. Berns,et al.  A Neural Predictor of Cultural Popularity , 2010 .

[28]  K. Felmingham,et al.  Sex Differences and Emotion Regulation: An Event-Related Potential Study , 2013, PloS one.

[29]  D. Ariely,et al.  Sequential Choice in Group Settings: Taking the Road Less Traveled and Less Enjoyed , 2000 .

[30]  N. Garg,et al.  Aesthetic principles and cognitive emotion appraisals: How much of the beauty lies in the eye of the beholder? , 2010 .

[31]  M. Bradley,et al.  Motivated attention: Affect, activation, and action. , 1997 .

[32]  M. Codispoti,et al.  When does size not matter? Effects of stimulus size on affective modulation. , 2006, Psychophysiology.

[33]  R. E. Milliman,et al.  Atmospheric Effects on Shopping Behavior: A Review of the Experimental Evidence , 2000 .

[34]  Jennifer J. Argo,et al.  The Influence of a Mere Social Presence in a Retail Context , 2005 .

[35]  Francisco Mercado,et al.  Emotion and Attention Interaction Studied through Event-Related Potentials , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[36]  John T. Cacioppo,et al.  Social neuroscience: Principles of psychophysiological arousal and response. , 1996 .

[37]  Jennifer J. Argo,et al.  Embarrassment in Consumer Purchase: The Roles of Social Presence and Purchase Familiarity , 2001 .

[38]  Jennifer J. Argo,et al.  Positive Consumer Contagion: Responses to Attractive Others in a Retail Context , 2008 .

[39]  G. Laurent,et al.  Attitudes Towards the Concept of Luxury: an exploratory analysis , 1994 .

[40]  M. Bradley,et al.  Emotion, Motivation, and Anxiety: Brain Mechanisms and Psychophysiology the Motivational Organization of Emotion Patterns of Human Emotion Emotion and Perception the Psychophysiology of Picture Processing Neural Imaging: Motivation in the Visual Cortex Motivational Circuits in the Brain , 2022 .

[41]  W. Sommer,et al.  Emotions in word and face processing: Early and late cortical responses , 2009, Brain and Cognition.

[42]  Paul Pauli,et al.  Modulation of event-related brain potentials during affective picture processing: a complement to startle reflex and skin conductance response? , 2004, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[43]  M. Bradley,et al.  Activation of the visual cortex in motivated attention. , 2003, Behavioral neuroscience.

[44]  M. Bradley,et al.  Large-scale neural correlates of affective picture processing. , 2002, Psychophysiology.

[45]  S. Fiske,et al.  Social Psychology , 2019, Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences.

[46]  Vladas Griskevicius,et al.  Conspicuous consumption, relationships, and rivals: Women's luxury products as signals to other women , 2014 .

[47]  Peter J. Lang,et al.  Attention and Orienting : Sensory and Motivational Processes , 1997 .

[48]  Henrik Hagtvedt,et al.  The broad embrace of luxury: Hedonic potential as a driver of brand extendibility , 2009 .

[49]  R. Zajonc.  SOCIAL FACILITATION. , 1965, Science.

[50]  B. Wexler,et al.  Emotion self-regulation and empathy depend upon longer stimulus exposure. , 2014, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[51]  H. Markus,et al.  The effect of mere presence on social facilitation: An unobtrusive test , 1978 .

[52]  H. Möller,et al.  Prefrontal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Changes Connectivity of Resting-State Networks during fMRI , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[53]  Greg M. Allenby,et al.  Modeling Interdependent Consumer Preferences , 2003 .

[54]  J. Kapferer.  Managing luxury brands , 1997 .

[55]  Jennifer J. Argo,et al.  When Imitation Doesn’t Flatter: The Role of Consumer Distinctiveness in Responses to Mimicry , 2011 .

[56]  R. Cabeza,et al.  Event-related potentials of emotional memory: Encoding pleasant, unpleasant, and neutral pictures , 2002, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[57]  Scott A. Huettel,et al.  New Scanner Data for Brand Marketers: How Neuroscience Can Help Better Understand Differences in Brand Preferences , 2011 .

[58]  M. Ritson,et al.  Everyday Advertising Context: An Ethnography of Advertising Response in the Family Living Room , 2013 .

[59]  J. Coan,et al.  Social Baseline Theory: The Role of Social Proximity in Emotion and Economy of Action , 2011 .

[60]  J. E. Creighton,et al.  Lectures On Human And Animal Psychology , 1896 .

[61]  Kyle B. Murray,et al.  An Arousal Regulation Explanation of Mood Effects on Consumer Choice , 2012 .

[62]  Vera Ferrari,et al.  Repetitive exposure: brain and reflex measures of emotion and attention. , 2011, Psychophysiology.

[63]  Michel Wedel,et al.  Optimal Feature Advertising Design Under Competitive Clutter , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[64]  Rebecca K. Ratner,et al.  The Impact of Private versus Public Consumption on Variety-Seeking Behavior , 2002 .

[65]  G. Hajcak,et al.  Event-Related Potentials, Emotion, and Emotion Regulation: An Integrative Review , 2010, Developmental neuropsychology.

[66]  Peter Lang,et al.  Brain processes in emotional perception: Motivated attention , 2004 .

[67]  M. Bradley,et al.  Emotional perception: correlation of functional MRI and event-related potentials. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[68]  Harald T. Schupp,et al.  Emotional Facilitation of Sensory Processing in the Visual Cortex , 2003, Psychological science.

[69]  J. Kissler,et al.  Buzzwords , 2007, Psychological science.

[70]  L Carretié,et al.  Emotion, attention, and the 'negativity bias', studied through event-related potentials. , 2001, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[71]  Dan Foti,et al.  Deconstructing Reappraisal: Descriptions Preceding Arousing Pictures Modulate the Subsequent Neural Response , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[72]  Donatella Spinelli,et al.  Neural correlates of fast stimulus discrimination and response selection in top-level fencers , 2006, Neuroscience Letters.

[73]  David I. Laibson,et al.  Neuroeconomics: How Neuroscience Can Inform Economics , 2005 .

[74]  D. Keltner,et al.  Embarrassment: its distinct form and appeasement functions. , 1997, Psychological bulletin.

[75]  Lawrence C. Soley,et al.  Advertising Pressures on Newspapers: A Survey , 1992 .

[76]  Mary Jo Bitner,et al.  Servicescapes: The Impact of Physical Surroundings on Customers and Employees: , 1992 .

[77]  Vera Ferrari,et al.  Repetitive picture processing: Autonomic and cortical correlates , 2006, Brain Research.

[78]  Peter Salovey,et al.  Some antecedents and consequences of social-comparison jealousy , 1984 .

[79]  M. Bradley,et al.  Brain potentials in perception: picture complexity and emotional arousal. , 2007, Psychophysiology.

[80]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Bioelectrical echoes from evaluative categorizations: I. A late positive brain potential that varies as a function of trait negativity and extremity. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[81]  A. Goldstein,et al.  Adult attachment orientations and the processing of emotional pictures – ERP correlates , 2007 .