Prosthesis evaluation questionnaire for persons with lower limb amputations: assessing prosthesis-related quality of life.

OBJECTIVE To develop a self-report questionnaire for persons with lower limb amputations who use a prosthesis. The resulting scales were intended to be suitable to evaluate the prosthesis and life with the prosthesis. The conceptual framework was health-related quality of life. DESIGN Multiple steps of scale development, terminating with test-retest of the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ) by mail. SOURCE OF SAMPLE: Records from two Seattle hospitals. PATIENTS Ninety-two patients with lower limb amputations who varied by age, reason for amputation, years since amputation, and amputation level. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The 10 scales used were 4 prosthesis function scales (Usefulness, Residual Limb Health, Appearance, and Sounds), 2 mobility scales (Ambulation and Transfers), 3 psychosocial scales (Perceived Responses, Frustration, and Social Burden), and 1 Well-being scale. Validation measures were the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36, the Social Interaction subscale from the Sickness Impact Profile, and the Profile of Mood States-short form. RESULTS Nine PEQ scales demonstrated high internal consistency. All met test-retest criteria for comparing group results. Validity was described based on methods used to gather original items, distribution of scores, and comparison of scores with criterion variables. CONCLUSIONS The PEQ scales displayed good psychometric properties. Future work will assess responsiveness of PEQ scales to changes in prosthetic components. We conclude that they will be useful in evaluation of prosthetic care.

[1]  D G Ferris,et al.  Measurement of subjective phenomena in primary care research: the Visual Analogue Scale. , 1993, Family practice research journal.

[2]  I. Mccoll,et al.  Rehabilitation after lower limb amputation: A comparative study of above‐knee, through‐knee and Gritti—Stokes amputations , 1989, The British journal of surgery.

[3]  C. Gauthier-Gagnon,et al.  Prosthetic profile of people with lower extremity amputation: conception and design of a follow-up questionnaire. , 1993, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[4]  Robert F. DeVellis,et al.  Scale Development: Theory and Applications. , 1992 .

[5]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[6]  Geoffrey Keppel,et al.  Statistical Analysis in Psychology and Education. 5th ed. , 1981 .

[7]  E. Jessop,et al.  A comparison of measures of disability and health status in people with physical disabilities undergoing vocational rehabilitation. , 1996, Journal of public health medicine.

[8]  Reiber Ge Who is at risk of limb loss and what to do about it , 1994 .

[9]  G. Reiber,et al.  Prosthetic history, prosthetic charges, and functional outcome of the isolated, traumatic below-knee amputee. , 1995, The Journal of trauma.

[10]  M. Bergner,et al.  The Sickness Impact Profile: Development and Final Revision of a Health Status Measure , 1981, Medical care.

[11]  E. C. Huskisson,et al.  Graphic representation of pain , 1976, Pain.

[12]  G. A. Ferguson,et al.  Statistical analysis in psychology and education , 1960 .

[13]  L. Bouter,et al.  Measuring functional limitations in rising and sitting down: development of a questionnaire. , 1996, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[14]  Michael R. Menard,et al.  Subjective and Objective Analysis of an Energy-Storing Prosthetic Foot , 1989 .

[15]  Richard Schulz,et al.  Social and psychological factors in adjustment to limb amputation. , 1994 .

[16]  C. Gauthier-Gagnon,et al.  Prosthetic profile of the amputee questionnaire: validity and reliability. , 1994, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[17]  Michael A. Andrykowski,et al.  Short Form of the Profile of Mood States (POMS-SF): Psychometric Information. , 1995 .

[18]  L. Cronbach Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests , 1951 .

[19]  R W Wirta,et al.  Effect on gait using various prosthetic ankle-foot devices. , 1991, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[20]  D. Dillman Mail and telephone surveys : the total design method , 1979 .

[21]  C. Sherbourne,et al.  The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) , 1992 .

[22]  M. Devlin,et al.  Predicting prosthetic rehabilitation outcome in lower limb amputee patients with the functional independence measure. , 1996, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[23]  G. Guyatt,et al.  A comparison of Likert and visual analogue scales for measuring change in function. , 1987, Journal of chronic diseases.

[24]  S. Shacham,et al.  A shortened version of the Profile of Mood States. , 1983, Journal of personality assessment.