Subdigital adhesive pad morphology varies in relation to structural habitat use in the Namib Day Gecko

Summary Morphological features that lead to increased locomotor performance, such as faster sprint speed, are thought to evolve in concert with habitat use. The latter depends on available habitat structure and how the animal moves within that habitat. Thus, this behavioural variation will impact how natural selection acts on locomotion and morphology. Quantifying the interplay between escape behaviour and locomotor morphology across habitats that vary in structural composition could reveal how selection acts on locomotion at local levels. Substrate features, such as incline and topographical variation, are likely key drivers of morphological and functional disparity among terrestrial animals. We investigated the impact of habitat variation and escape behaviour on morphology, including the adhesive system, of Rhoptropus afer, a diurnal and cursorial gecko from Namibia. Substrate incline and topographical variation are likely important for this pad-bearing gecko due to the trade-off between adhering and sprinting (i.e. using adhesion results in decreased sprint speed). We corroborate the hypothesis that the adhesive system exhibits the greatest degree of reduction in populations that utilize the flattest terrain during an escape. Our findings suggest that the adhesive apparatus is detrimental to rapid locomotion on relatively horizontal surfaces and may thus be counterproductive to the evasion of predators in such situations. A broad scale analysis of geckos would determine whether diversity of adhesive morphology is driven primarily by habitat use. Phenotypic plasticity of the adhesive system and interspecific competition are plausible candidates for driving our results. However, it is unclear whether the differences we observed have a genetic basis. Future work should focus on how variation of the adhesive system impacts downstream locomotor components such as kinematics and mechanics and how the integration of these traits is related to habitat use.

[1]  James Smith,et al.  The Food Searching Behaviour of Two European Thrushes. Ii: the Adaptiveness of the Search Patterns , 1974 .

[2]  V. Fitzsimons.  The lizards of South Africa , 1943 .

[3]  L. Harmon,et al.  MULTIVARIATE PHENOTYPIC EVOLUTION AMONG ISLAND AND MAINLAND POPULATIONS OF THE ORNATE DAY GECKO, PHELSUMA ORNATA , 2006, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[4]  Mark J. Sistrom,et al.  Morphological differentiation correlates with ecological but not with genetic divergence in a Gehyra gecko , 2012, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[5]  R. Full,et al.  Dynamics of geckos running vertically , 2006, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[6]  Robert N. Fisher,et al.  A comparative analysis of clinging ability among pad‐bearing lizards , 1996 .

[7]  Burt P. Kotler.  Risk of predation and the structure of desert rodent communities , 1984 .

[8]  A. Minetti,et al.  Energy cost of walking and running at extreme uphill and downhill slopes. , 2002, Journal of applied physiology.

[9]  Menna E. Jones,et al.  COEXISTENCE OF TEMPORALLY PARTITIONED SPINY MICE: ROLES OF HABITAT STRUCTURE AND FORAGING BEHAVIOR , 2001 .

[10]  R. Ruibal,et al.  The structure of the digital setae of lizards , 1965, Journal of morphology.

[11]  A. Bauer.  Evolutionary scenarios in the Pachydactylus Group geckos of southern Africa: new hypotheses , 1999 .

[12]  A. Bauer,et al.  Out of the blue: a novel, trans‐Atlantic clade of geckos (Gekkota, Squamata) , 2008 .

[13]  A. Russell,et al.  Between a rock and a soft place: microtopography of the locomotor substrate and the morphology of the setal fields of Namibian day geckos (Gekkota: Gekkonidae: Rhoptropus) , 2014 .

[14]  J. Losos,et al.  Do Lizards Avoid Habitats in Which Performance Is Submaximal? The Relationship between Sprinting Capabilities and Structural Habitat Use in Caribbean Anoles , 1999, The American Naturalist.

[15]  C. R. Taylor,et al.  Running Up and Down Hills: Some Consequences of Size , 1972, Science.

[16]  A. Herrel,et al.  Correlations between habitat use and body shape in a phrynosomatid lizard ( Urosaurus ornatus ) : a population-level analysis , 2001 .

[17]  K. Main.  Predator Avoidance in Seagrass Meadows: Prey Behavior, Microhabitat Selection, and Cryptic Coloration , 1987 .

[18]  J. Losos,et al.  ECOLOGICAL MORPHOLOGY OF CARIBBEAN ANOLES , 1999 .

[19]  D. Schluter.  Ecology and the origin of species. , 2001, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[20]  The varied foraging mode of the subtropical eublepharid gecko Goniurosaurus kuroiwae orientalis , 2004 .

[21]  D. Schluter.  Experimental Evidence That Competition Promotes Divergence in Adaptive Radiation , 1994, Science.

[22]  A. Bauer,et al.  Repeated Origin and Loss of Adhesive Toepads in Geckos , 2012, PloS one.

[23]  R. Full,et al.  Evidence for van der Waals adhesion in gecko setae , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  L. Vitt,et al.  Coming to America: multiple origins of New World geckos , 2011, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[25]  A. Russell.  Parallelism and Integrated Design in the Foot Structure of Gekkonine and Diplodactyline Geckos , 1979 .

[26]  E. Zehr,et al.  Ballistic movement: muscle activation and neuromuscular adaptation. , 1994, Canadian journal of applied physiology = Revue canadienne de physiologie appliquee.

[27]  J. Losos.  The Evolution of Convergent Structure in Caribbean Anolis Communities , 1992 .

[28]  A. Russell,et al.  Real-world challenges to, and capabilities of, the gekkotan adhesive system: contrasting the rough and the smooth , 2007 .

[29]  Fieler.  Effects of speed on the hindlimb kinematics of the lizard dipsosaurus dorsalis , 1998, The Journal of experimental biology.

[30]  Daniel Sáenz,et al.  Body shape, burst speed and escape behavior of larval anurans , 2005 .

[31]  D. Miles.  The race goes to the swift: fitness consequences of variation in sprint performance in juvenile lizards , 2004 .

[32]  S. J. Arnold,et al.  Morphology, Performance and Fitness , 1983 .

[33]  Timothy E Higham,et al.  A new angle on clinging in geckos: incline, not substrate, triggers the deployment of the adhesive system , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[34]  A. Bauer,et al.  The evolution of locomotor morphology in Rhoptropus (Squamata: Gekkonidae): Functional and phylogenetic considerations , 1996 .

[35]  D. Schluter,et al.  Ecological Character Displacement and Speciation in Sticklebacks , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[36]  T. Higham,et al.  The scaling of uphill and downhill locomotion in legged animals. , 2014, Integrative and comparative biology.

[37]  A. Bauer,et al.  Mitochondrial Phylogeny of Namib Day Geckos (Rhoptropus) Based on Cytochrome b and 16S rRNA Sequences , 2001, Copeia.

[38]  Ws. Rasband.  ImageJ, U.S. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA , 2011 .

[39]  A. Herrel,et al.  The Tendinous Patterns in the Palmar Surface of the Lizard Manus: Functional Consequences for Grasping Ability , 2009, Anatomical record.

[40]  W. Cooper,et al.  Universal Optimization of Flight Initiation Distance and Habitat-Driven Variation in Escape Tactics in a Namibian Lizard Assemblage , 2007 .

[41]  J. Losos,et al.  A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE ECOLOGICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF MAXIMAL LOCOMOTOR PERFORMANCE IN CARIBBEAN ANOLIS LIZARDS , 1998, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[42]  T. Higham,et al.  Divergence in locomotor performance, ecology, and morphology between two sympatric sister species of desert-dwelling gecko , 2010 .

[43]  R J Full,et al.  How animals move: an integrative view. , 2000, Science.

[44]  A. Bauer,et al.  Locomotor morphometry of the Pachydactylus radiation of lizards (Gekkota: Gekkonidae): a phylogenetically and ecologically informed analysis , 2005 .

[45]  R. Calsbeek,et al.  An ecological twist on the morphology-performance-fitness axis , 2008 .

[46]  W. Cooper,et al.  Beyond optimal escape theory: microhabitats as well as predation risk affect escape and refuge use by the phrynosomatid lizard Sceloporus virgatus , 2007 .

[47]  Experimental evidence for friction-enhancing integumentary modifications of chameleons and associated functional and evolutionary implications , 2014, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[48]  V. Bels,et al.  Biomechanics and kinematics of limb-based locomotion in lizards: review, synthesis and prospectus. , 2001, Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Part A, Molecular & integrative physiology.

[49]  Anthony P. Russell,et al.  Insights from studies of gecko-inspired adhesion and their impact on our understanding of the evolution of the gekkotan adhesive system , 2007 .

[50]  A. Russell.  Integrative Functional Morphology of the Gekkotan Adhesive System (Reptilia: Gekkota)1 , 2002, Integrative and comparative biology.

[51]  A. Russell.  A contribution to the functional analysis of the foot of the Tokay, Gekko gecko (Reptilia: Gekkonidae) , 1975 .

[52]  Gravity in primates and its relation to body shape and locomotion , 1990 .

[53]  D. Irschick.  Measuring Performance in Nature: Implications for Studies of Fitness Within Populations1 , 2003, Integrative and comparative biology.

[54]  J. Losos,et al.  A PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS OF CHARACTER DISPLACEMENT IN CARIBBEAN ANOLIS LIZARDS , 1990, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[55]  J. Husak.  Does speed help you survive? A test with Collared Lizards of different ages , 2006 .

[56]  L. Harmon,et al.  Beyond black and white: divergent behaviour and performance in three rapidly evolving lizard species at White Sands , 2014 .

[57]  Eric J. McElroy,et al.  The relationship between limb morphology, kinematics, and force during running: the evolution of locomotor dynamics in lizards , 2009 .

[58]  L. Vitt,et al.  The role of habitat shift in the evolution of lizard morphology: evidence from tropical Tropidurus. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[59]  L. Vitt,et al.  A COMPARISON OF EVOLUTIONARY RADIATIONS IN MAINLAND AND CARIBBEAN ANOLIS LIZARDS , 1997 .

[60]  Yu Tian,et al.  Adhesion and friction in gecko toe attachment and detachment , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[61]  P. Wainwright.  Ecomorphology: Experimental Functional Anatomy for Ecological Problems , 1991 .

[62]  T. Roberts,et al.  Mechanical function of two ankle extensors in wild turkeys: shifts from energy production to energy absorption during incline versus decline running , 2004, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[63]  A. Kaliontzopoulou,et al.  Intraspecific ecomorphological variation: linear and geometric morphometrics reveal habitat‐related patterns within Podarcis bocagei wall lizards , 2010, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[64]  J. Losos,et al.  Partial island submergence and speciation in an adaptive radiation: a multilocus analysis of the Cuban green anoles , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[65]  P. Wainwright.  Functional Versus Morphological Diversity in Macroevolution , 2007 .

[66]  A. Russell,et al.  Configuration of the setal fields of Rhoptropus (Gekkota: Gekkonidae): functional, evolutionary, ecological and phylogenetic implications of observed pattern , 2009, Journal of anatomy.

[67]  K. Autumn,et al.  Mechanisms of Adhesion in Geckos1 , 2002, Integrative and comparative biology.

[68]  Farley,et al.  Efficiency of uphill locomotion in nocturnal and diurnal lizards , 1996, The Journal of experimental biology.

[69]  A. Biewener.  Mammalian terrestrial locomotion and size , 1989 .

[70]  J. McGraw,et al.  Natural Selection and Ecotypic Differentiation in Impatiens Pallida , 1995 .

[71]  D. Irschick,et al.  THE QUICK AND THE DEAD: CORRELATIONAL SELECTION ON MORPHOLOGY, PERFORMANCE, AND HABITAT USE IN ISLAND LIZARDS , 2007, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[72]  T. Moermond.  The Influence of Habitat Structure On a Nolis Foraging Behavior , 1979 .

[73]  J. Stamps,et al.  A Comparative Study of Population Density and Sexual Size Dimorphism in Lizards , 1997, The American Naturalist.

[74]  Thomas J Roberts,et al.  Sources of mechanical power for uphill running in humans , 2005, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[75]  A. Bauer,et al.  Pedal specialisations in dune-dwelling geckos , 1991 .

[76]  R. A. Anderson,et al.  Rock-dwelling lizards exhibit less sensitivity of sprint speed to increases in substrate rugosity. , 2013, Zoology.

[77]  Andrew A Biewener,et al.  Unsteady locomotion: integrating muscle function with whole body dynamics and neuromuscular control , 2007, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[78]  William E. Cooper,et al.  ESCAPE BY A REFUGING PREY, THE BROAD-HEADED SKINK (EUMECES LATICEPS) , 1997 .

[79]  A. Bauer,et al.  Footprints in the sand: independent reduction of subdigital lamellae in the Namib–Kalahari burrowing geckos , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[80]  J. Schmitt,et al.  ADAPTIVE DIVERGENCE IN PLASTICITY IN NATURAL POPULATIONS OF IMPATIENS CAPENSIS AND ITS CONSEQUENCES FOR PERFORMANCE IN NOVEL HABITATS , 2001, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.