Biomechanical analysis of materials handling manipulators in short distance transfers of moderate mass objects: joint strength, spine forces and muscular antagonism.

Although often suggested as a control measure to alleviate musculoskeletal stresses, the use of mechanical assistance devices (i.e. manipulators) in load transfers has not been extensively studied. Without data describing the biomechanical effects of such devices, justification for decisions regarding implementation of such tools is difficult. An experimental study of two types of mechanical manipulators (articulated arm and overhead hoist) was conducted to determine whether biomechanical stresses, and hence injury risk, would be alleviated. Short distance transfers of loads with moderate mass were performed both manually and with manipulator assistance under a variety of task conditions. Using analysis and output from new dynamic torso models, strength demands at the shoulders and low back, lumbar spine forces, and lumbar muscle antagonism were determined. Strength requirements decreased significantly at both the shoulders and low back when using either manipulator in comparison with similar transfers performed manually. Peak spine compression and anterior-posterior (a-p) shear forces were reduced by about 40% on average, and these reductions were shown to be primarily caused by decreases in hand forces and resultant spinal moments. Two metrics of muscular antagonism were defined, and analysis showed that torso muscle antagonism was largest overall when using the hoist. The results overall suggest that hoist-assisted transfers, although better in reducing spine compression forces, may impose relatively higher demands on coordination and/or stability at extreme heights or with torso twisting motions. The relatively higher strength requirements and spine compression associated with the articulated arm may be a result of the high inertia of the system. Potential benefits of practice and training are discussed, and conclusions regarding implementation of mechanical manipulators are given.

[1]  Don B. Chaffin,et al.  Kinematics, Kinetics, and Psychophysical Perceptions in Symmetric and Twisting Pushing and Pulling Tasks , 1996, Hum. Factors.

[2]  D B Chaffin,et al.  Establishing an industrial strength testing program. , 1980, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[3]  D B Chaffin,et al.  Lumbar muscle force estimation using a subject-invariant 5-parameter EMG-based model. , 1998, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  P Brinckmann,et al.  Prediction of the compressive strength of human lumbar vertebrae. , 1989, Clinical biomechanics.

[5]  A. Bergmark Stability of the lumbar spine. A study in mechanical engineering. , 1989, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica. Supplementum.

[6]  M. Panjabi,et al.  The Intersegmental and Multisegmental Muscles of the Lumbar Spine: A Biomechanical Model Comparing Lateral Stabilizing Potential , 1991, Spine.

[7]  W. Marras,et al.  An EMG-assisted model of loads on the lumbar spine during asymmetric trunk extensions. , 1993, Journal of biomechanics.

[8]  P. Dolan,et al.  Recent advances in lumbar spinal mechanics and their clinical significance. , 1995, Clinical biomechanics.

[9]  D B Chaffin,et al.  Low-back stresses when learning to use a materials handling device. , 1999, Ergonomics.

[10]  P Lövsund,et al.  A method for studying the biomechanical load response of the (in vitro) lumbar spine under dynamic flexion-shear loads. , 1993, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  Jeffrey C. Woldstad,et al.  Dynamic push and pull forces while using a manual material handling assist device , 1994 .

[12]  G B Andersson,et al.  Trunk muscle cocontraction: The effects of moment direction and moment magnitude , 1992, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[13]  R. Hughes,et al.  Evaluation of muscle force prediction models of the lumbar trunk using surface electromyography , 1994, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[14]  J. Cholewicki,et al.  Mechanical stability of the in vivo lumbar spine: implications for injury and chronic low back pain. , 1996, Clinical biomechanics.

[15]  A B Schultz,et al.  Lumbar Muscle Activities in Rapid Three‐dimensional Pulling Tasks , 1996, Spine.

[16]  L. Fisher,et al.  Isometric Lifting Strength As a Predictor of Industrial Back Pain Reports , 1989, Spine.

[17]  A B Schultz,et al.  Co‐contraction of lumbar muscles during the development of time‐varying triaxial moments , 1995, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[18]  S H Snook,et al.  Approaches to preplacement testing and selection of workers. , 1987, Ergonomics.

[19]  D B Chaffin,et al.  Muscle lines-of-action affect predicted forces in optimization-based spine muscle modeling. , 1995, Journal of biomechanics.

[20]  Jaap H. van Dieën,et al.  Are recruitment patterns of the trunk musculature compatible with a synergy based on the maximization of endurance , 1997 .

[21]  Don B. Chaffin,et al.  An ergonomic evaluation of three classes of material handling device (MHD) , 1997 .

[22]  W. Marras,et al.  An EMG-assisted model of trunk loading during free-dynamic lifting. , 1995, Journal of biomechanics.

[23]  S. McGill The biomechanics of low back injury: implications on current practice in industry and the clinic. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[24]  A B Schultz,et al.  Biomechanical model calculation of muscle contraction forces: a double linear programming method. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.

[25]  D. Chaffin,et al.  Isometric and isokinetic back and arm lifting strengths: device and measurement. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.

[26]  D B Chaffin,et al.  Development and evaluation of a scalable and deformable geometric model of the human torso. , 1996, Clinical biomechanics.

[27]  N. Dalén,et al.  Poor results of bovine xenograft for knee cruciate ligament repair. , 1989, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[28]  A Schultz,et al.  Use of lumbar trunk muscles in isometric performance of mechanically complex standing tasks , 1983, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[29]  S. McGill A myoelectrically based dynamic three-dimensional model to predict loads on lumbar spine tissues during lateral bending. , 1992, Journal of biomechanics.