Effect of joint type on rigid airfield pavement behavior

The effects of dowel and key joints in the rigid airfield pavements on the stress distribution in the concrete slab and on the Load Transfer Efficiency (LTE) at joints were investigated in this study. Numerical analysis models including dowel and key joints of the rigid airfield pavements were developed to analyze behaviors under environmental and aircraft gear loads. The analysis results showed that under gear loads both the dowel and key joint pavement slabs had very similar stress distributions when the joint gap did not exist, but the key joint pavement slab had larger stresses than dowel joint one when the joint gap existed and the loads were applied near the joint. The LTEs at joints were excellent at both pavement slabs without a joint gap, but the LTE decreased significantly in the key joint pavement as the joint gap became larger. Under environmental loads, the stresses at both the dowel and key joint pavement slabs were almost the same and those increased slightly when there was a joint gap. When the rigid airfield pavement had only the dowel joints along both the longitudinal and transverse joints, there was no stress concentration in the slabs and the stresses were smaller and the LTEs were higher than the pavement that had the dowel joints along one direction and the key joints along the other direction, which was the current airfield pavement joint design in Korea. Keywords: rigid airfield pavement, dowel joint, environmental load, gear load, jointed concrete

[1]  Yusuf Mehta,et al.  Load Transfer Efficiency of Rigid Airfield Pavement , 2012 .

[2]  Erol Tutumluer,et al.  Validation of a Three-Dimensional Finite Element Model using Airfield Pavement Multiple Wheel Load Responses , 2010 .

[3]  Amit H. Varma,et al.  Experimental and Analytical Investigations of Mechanistic Effects of Dowel Misalignment in Jointed Concrete Pavements , 2007 .

[4]  Swati Roy Maitra,et al.  Load Transfer Characteristics of Aggregate Interlocking in Concrete Pavement , 2010 .

[5]  Kyle Hoegh,et al.  Evaluation of Dowel Alignment Constructability in Portland Cement Concrete Pavements , 2009 .

[6]  Ciro Caliendo,et al.  Stress-Prediction Model for Airport Pavements with Jointed Concrete Slabs , 2010 .

[7]  Swati Roy Maitra,et al.  Load Transfer Characteristics of Dowel Bar System in Jointed Concrete Pavement , 2009 .

[8]  Susan L. Tighe,et al.  Finite Difference Modeling of Misaligned Dowel Bars and Their Effects on Joint Performance , 2006 .

[9]  Jiwon Kim,et al.  Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Doweled Joints for Airport Pavements , 2003 .

[10]  Youngguk Seo,et al.  Longitudinal cracking at transverse joints caused by dowel bars in Jointed Concrete Pavements , 2013 .

[11]  James K Cable Changing the Shape and Location of Pavement Load Transfer Devices , 2005 .

[12]  Yusuf Mehta,et al.  Load Transfer Efficiencies of Rigid Airfield Pavement Joints Based on Stresses and Deflections , 2011 .

[13]  Kunihito Matsui,et al.  Finite Element Model Analysis of Thermal Stresses of Thick Airport Concrete Pavement Slabs , 2009 .

[14]  Dan Ye,et al.  Evaluating the Effect of Concrete Slab Curling on Joint Load Transfer Responses , 2012 .

[15]  Shiraz D Tayabji DOWEL PLACEMENT TOLERANCES FOR CONCRETE PAVEMENTS , 1986 .

[16]  Boo-Hyun Nam Transition of the Rolling Dynamic Deflectometer Device from a Screening Tool to an Evaluation Tool for Rigid Airfield Pavement Projects , 2011 .

[17]  Thomas Yu Evaluation of Dowel Bars Installed in Airfield Concrete Pavement Construction Joints by Using Plastic Sleeves , 2005 .

[18]  Dar-Hao Chen,et al.  Effects of Base Support and Load Transfer Efficiency (LTE) on Portland Concrete Pavement Performance , 2010 .