The effects of different electrical stimulation protocols on nerve regeneration through silicone conduits.

BACKGROUND The effects of electrical stimulation on the regeneration of transected nerves through silicone rubber conduits may depend on the stimulation protocol. METHODS Rat sciatic nerve was transected and reconnected using a silicone rubber conduit with a 7-mm gap. The subjects were divided into nine groups. Each group received one protocol of electrical stimulation 30 minutes each day for 3 weeks. The effects of electrical stimulation were evaluated through morphologic methods. RESULTS Direct current stimulation increased nerve fiber bundle area without significantly affecting the number of myelinated fibers, resulting in decreased nerve fiber density. All the pulse current stimulation protocols as a group decreased the nerve fiber bundle area without affecting the number of myelinated fibers, resulting in increased nerve fiber density. Within the pulse current stimulation protocols, stimulation frequency affected nerve fiber density, whereas current strength did not. CONCLUSIONS Stimulation protocols had significant influences on the benefit of electrical stimulation in nerve regeneration.

[1]  B. Albala,et al.  Facilitated regeneration in the rat peripheral nervous system using applied electric fields. , 1988, The Journal of trauma.

[2]  M. Spector,et al.  Connective tissue response to tubular implants for peripheral nerve regeneration: The role of myofibroblasts , 2000, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[3]  B. Seckel,et al.  Enhancement of peripheral nerve regeneration , 1990, Muscle & nerve.

[4]  T Gordon,et al.  Brief Electrical Stimulation Promotes the Speed and Accuracy of Motor Axonal Regeneration , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  Electrical field effects on crushed nerve regeneration , 1992, Experimental Neurology.

[6]  B. Pomeranz,et al.  Weak electric current accelerates motoneuron regeneration in the sciatic nerve of ten-month-old rats , 1993, Brain Research.

[7]  M. McGinnis,et al.  The lack of an effect of applied d.c. electric fields on peripheral nerve regeneration in the guinea pig , 1992, Neuroscience.

[8]  B F Sisken,et al.  Prospects on clinical applications of electrical stimulation for nerve regeneration , 1993, Journal of cellular biochemistry.

[9]  W. Nix,et al.  Electrical stimulation of regenerating nerve and its effect on motor recovery , 1983, Brain Research.

[10]  B. Pomeranz,et al.  Application of weak electric field to the hindpaw enhances sciatic motor nerve regeneration in the adult rat , 1987, Brain Research.

[11]  A. Sébille,et al.  Effects of electric stimulation and previous nerve injury on motor function recovery in rats , 1980, Brain Research.