High-rate quantization for the Neyman-Pearson detection of Hidden Markov Processes

This paper investigates the decentralized detection of Hidden Markov Processes using the Neyman-Pearson test. We consider a network formed by a large number of distributed sensors. Sensors' observations are noisy snapshots of a Markov process to be detected. Each (real) observation is quantized on log2(N) bits before being transmitted to a fusion center which makes the final decision. For any false alarm level, it is shown that the miss probability of the Neyman-Pearson test converges to zero exponentially as the number of sensors tends to infinity. The error exponent is provided using recent results on Hidden Markov Models. In order to obtain informative expressions of the error exponent as a function of the quantization rule, we further investigate the case where the number N of quantization levels tends to infinity, following the approach developed in. In this regime, we provide the quantization rule maximizing the error exponent. Illustration of our results is provided in the case of the detection of a Gauss-Markov signal in noise. In terms of error exponent, the proposed quantization rule significantly outperforms the one proposed by for i.i.d. observations.

[1]  Venugopal V. Veeravalli,et al.  How Dense Should a Sensor Network Be for Detection With Correlated Observations? , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[2]  Eric Moulines,et al.  On the error exponents for detecting randomly sampled noisy diffusion processes , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing.

[3]  Alfred O. Hero,et al.  High-rate vector quantization for detection , 2003, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[4]  John N. Tsitsiklis,et al.  Decentralized detection by a large number of sensors , 1988, Math. Control. Signals Syst..

[5]  Richard L. Tweedie,et al.  Markov Chains and Stochastic Stability , 1993, Communications and Control Engineering Series.

[6]  Allen Gersho,et al.  Vector quantization and signal compression , 1991, The Kluwer international series in engineering and computer science.

[7]  H. Vincent Poor,et al.  Neyman-pearson detection of gauss-Markov signals in noise: closed-form error exponentand properties , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[8]  Stephen E. Fienberg,et al.  Testing Statistical Hypotheses , 2005 .

[9]  W. R. Bennett,et al.  Spectra of quantized signals , 1948, Bell Syst. Tech. J..

[10]  H. Vincent Poor,et al.  Neyman-Pearson Detection of Gauss-Markov Signals in Noise: Closed-Form Error Exponent and Properties , 2005, ISIT.

[11]  Zhi-Quan Luo,et al.  Universal decentralized detection in a bandwidth-constrained sensor network , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[12]  Rick S. Blum,et al.  The good, bad and ugly: distributed detection of a known signal in dependent Gaussian noise , 2000, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[13]  Ke Liu,et al.  Type-Based Decentralized Detection in Wireless Sensor Networks , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[14]  Po-Ning Chen General formulas for the Neyman-Pearson type-II error exponent subject to fixed and exponential type-I error bounds , 1996, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[15]  R. Douc,et al.  Asymptotic properties of the maximum likelihood estimator in autoregressive models with Markov regime , 2004, math/0503681.