Volumetric MR-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation with a one-layer strategy to treat large uterine fibroids: initial clinical outcomes.

PURPOSE To evaluate initial clinical outcomes of volumetric magnetic resonance (MR)-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation by using a one-layer strategy to treat large (>10 cm in diameter) uterine fibroids, with investigation of the correlation between effectiveness of the one-layer strategy and dynamic contrast material-enhanced (DCE) MR parameters. MATERIALS AND METHODS Institutional review board approval and informed consent were obtained. Twenty-seven women (mean age, 44.5 years) with 27 large uterine fibroids (mean diameter, 11.3 cm ± 1.4 [standard deviation] [range, 10.1-16.0 cm]; fibroid volume, 502.5 mL ± 214.3 [range, 253.8-1184.0 mL]) underwent volumetric MR-guided HIFU ablation with a one-layer strategy. (All treatment cells were placed in one coronal plane at a depth of half to anterior two-thirds of the anteroposterior dimension of fibroids.) Treatment time, immediate nonperfused volume (NPV), and effectiveness of a one-layer strategy (ratio of immediate NPV to total volume of treatment cells planned) correlating with baseline DCE MR parameters (volume transfer constant [K(trans)], fractional extravascular extracellular space, and fractional blood plasma volume [Pearson correlation test]), complications, 3-month follow-up volumes, and symptom severity score (SSS) changes (paired t test) were assessed retrospectively. RESULTS All treatments showed technical success in one session (mean treatment time, 166.2 minutes ± 38.9). NPV was 301.3 mL ± 119.1, which was 64.2% ± 19.9 (<50%, n = 4; ≥ 50%, n = 23) of fibroid volume. Ratio of immediate NPV to total volume of treatment cells (1.79 ± 0.61) negatively correlated with DCE MR imaging K(trans) values (r = -0.426, P = .017). Minor complications occurred in five patients (18.5% [thermal injury of abdominal wall, n = 3; 30-day leg numbness, n = 1; cystitis, n = 1]). At 3-month follow-up (n = 18), mean SSS had decreased from 37.4 at baseline to 24.0 (P < .001), and volume reduction ratio was 0.64 ± 0.15 (P < .001). CONCLUSION Volumetric MR-guided HIFU ablation with a one-layer strategy is safe and effective for treatment of large uterine fibroids. Effectiveness of this strategy showed a significant negative correlation with K(trans) values at baseline DCE MR imaging.

[1]  Y. Na,et al.  Patient selection guidelines in MR-guided focused ultrasound surgery of uterine fibroids: a pictorial guide to relevant findings in screening pelvic MRI , 2008, European Radiology.

[2]  M. Knopp,et al.  Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast‐enhanced t1‐weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: Standardized quantities and symbols , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[3]  W. Dewey,et al.  Thermal dose determination in cancer therapy. , 1984, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[4]  E. Levy,et al.  Uterine artery embolization for leiomyomata. , 2001, Clinical privilege white paper.

[5]  Jean-François Geschwind,et al.  MRI guidance of focused ultrasound therapy of uterine fibroids: early results. , 2004, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[6]  B. Rutt,et al.  Rapid combined T1 and T2 mapping using gradient recalled acquisition in the steady state , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[7]  J. Reekers,et al.  Uterine artery embolization versus hysterectomy in the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids (EMMY trial): peri- and postprocedural results from a randomized controlled trial. , 2005, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[8]  L. Murray,et al.  Uterine-artery embolization versus surgery for symptomatic uterine fibroids. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  K. Kuroda,et al.  A precise and fast temperature mapping using water proton chemical shift , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  Kullervo Hynynen,et al.  Uterine leiomyomas: MR imaging-guided focused ultrasound surgery--imaging predictors of success. , 2008, Radiology.

[11]  Bruno Quesson,et al.  Improved Volumetric MR-HIFU Ablation by Robust Binary Feedback Control , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[12]  H. Rhim,et al.  Volumetric MR-HIFU ablation of uterine fibroids: role of treatment cell size in the improvement of energy efficiency. , 2012, European journal of radiology.

[13]  Jae-Hun Kim,et al.  Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predicts Immediate Therapeutic Response of Magnetic Resonance-Guided High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation of Symptomatic Uterine Fibroids , 2011, Investigative radiology.

[14]  S Nahum Goldberg,et al.  Image-guided tumor ablation: standardization of terminology and reporting criteria. , 2005, Radiology.

[15]  R. Jha,et al.  Long-Term Outcome of Uterine Artery Embolization of Leiomyomata , 2005, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[16]  E. Levy,et al.  Leiomyomata treated with uterine artery embolization: factors associated with successful symptom and imaging outcome. , 2002, Radiology.

[17]  Fiona Fennessy,et al.  Image-guided thermal therapy of uterine fibroids. , 2009, Seminars in ultrasound, CT, and MR.

[18]  Matthias David,et al.  Focused ultrasound treatment of uterine fibroid tumors: safety and feasibility of a noninvasive thermoablative technique. , 2003, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[19]  Y. Kaji,et al.  Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound surgery for uterine fibroids: relationship between the therapeutic effects and signal intensity of preexisting T2-weighted magnetic resonance images. , 2007, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[20]  S. LeBlang,et al.  Leiomyoma shrinkage after MRI-guided focused ultrasound treatment: report of 80 patients. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[21]  R. Lucht,et al.  Microcirculation and microvasculature in breast tumors: Pharmacokinetic analysis of dynamic MR image series , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[22]  Kullervo Hynynen,et al.  MR imaging-guided focused ultrasound surgery of uterine leiomyomas: a feasibility study. , 2003, Radiology.

[23]  B Quesson,et al.  Quantification of near-field heating during volumetric MR-HIFU ablation. , 2010, Medical physics.

[24]  J. Studd,et al.  Fatal septicaemia after fibroid embolisation , 1999, The Lancet.

[25]  S D Prionas,et al.  The effects of hyperthermia on normal mesenchymal tissues. Application of a histologic grading system. , 1983, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[26]  M. Cura,et al.  Role of magnetic resonance imaging in patient selection for uterine artery embolization , 2006, Acta radiologica.

[27]  G. Ehnholm,et al.  Volumetric HIFU ablation under 3D guidance of rapid MRI thermometry. , 2009, Medical physics.

[28]  K. Funaki,et al.  Clinical outcomes of magnetic resonance‐guided focused ultrasound surgery for uterine myomas: 24‐month follow‐up , 2009, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[29]  Elizabeth A Stewart,et al.  Magnetic Resonance-Guided Focused Ultrasound Surgery , 2010, Seminars in reproductive medicine.

[30]  J. Spies,et al.  Uterine fibroid embolization. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[31]  J. Spies,et al.  Uterine Artery Embolization for Fibroids: A Review of Current Outcomes , 2010, Seminars in reproductive medicine.

[32]  C. Tempany,et al.  Sustained Relief of Leiomyoma Symptoms by Using Focused Ultrasound Surgery , 2007, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[33]  Hisataka Kobayashi,et al.  Unusual appearances of uterine leiomyomas: MR imaging findings and their histopathologic backgrounds. , 1999, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[34]  J. Reekers,et al.  Symptomatic uterine fibroids: treatment with uterine artery embolization or hysterectomy--results from the randomized clinical Embolisation versus Hysterectomy (EMMY) Trial. , 2008, Radiology.