Effects of different inter-implant distances on the stress distribution around endosseous implants in posterior mandible: a 3D finite element analysis.

PURPOSE The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of different inter-implant distances on stress distribution in the bone around the endosseous titanium implants under vertical, oblique and horizontal loads in the posterior mandibular edentulousim by finite element analysis (3D FEA). MATERIALS AND METHODS 3D FEA models representing mandible and ITI implant (Straumann, Waldenburg, Switzerland) were simulated. The distances in-between the units were set at 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 cm. Vertical (V) 70 degrees N, 60 degrees oblique (BL) 35 degrees N in buccolingual direction and horizontal (MD) 14 degrees N in mesiodistal direction loads were applied to each of these designs. The principal stresses (tensile and compressive stress) on each model were calculated using MSC MARC finite element analyze solver software. RESULTS The tensile stress (P(max)) values have been evaluated that they rose at the cervical region of buccal side when the inter-implant distances increased under V and BL loads and they diminished while the inter-implant distances decreased. In short inter-implant distances the compressive stress (P(min)) has been presented with increased values and found at the lingual surface of the cervical region. DISCUSSION The results of this study indicated that the magnitude of the stress was influenced by complex factors such as the direction of loads and the distance between adjacent fixtures. The stress occurring around fixtures differs significantly with various types of inter-implant distance. CONCLUSION The evaluation of tensile and compressive stresses for cortical and cancellous bone under V, MD and BL loading conditions in aspect of inter-implant distance shows; the 1.0 cm of inter-implant distance is the optimum distance for two fixture implantation.

[1]  H. Iplikçioğlu,et al.  Finite element stress analysis of the influence of staggered versus straight placement of dental implants. , 2001, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[2]  R. Skalak,et al.  Interaction of force-fitting and surface roughness of implants. , 2000, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[3]  James Laney Williams,et al.  Anisotropic elasticity of cortical and cancellous bone in the posterior mandible increases peri-implant stress and strain under oblique loading. , 2001, Clinical oral implants research.

[4]  Ş. Canay,et al.  Comparison of stress distribution around vertical and angled implants with finite-element analysis. , 1996, Quintessence international.

[5]  G. Liu,et al.  Application of finite element analysis in implant dentistry: a review of the literature. , 2001, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[6]  P. Branemark,et al.  Long-term follow-up study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of totally edentulous jaws. , 1990, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[7]  H. Chun,et al.  Evaluation of design parameters of osseointegrated dental implants using finite element analysis. , 2002, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[8]  Haw-Ming Huang,et al.  Resonance frequency assessment of dental implant stability with various bone qualities: a numerical approach. , 2002, Clinical oral implants research.

[9]  C. Watson,et al.  Finite element analysis of fixed prostheses attached to osseointegrated implants. , 1990, Quintessence international.

[10]  Alexei Mossolov,et al.  Tooth-implant connection: some biomechanical aspects based on finite element analyses. , 2002, Clinical oral implants research.

[11]  A H Geering,et al.  Three-dimensional force measurements on mandibular implants supporting overdentures. , 1992, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[12]  H. Iplikçioğlu,et al.  Finite element stress analysis of the effect of short implant usage in place of cantilever extensions in mandibular posterior edentulism. , 2002, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[13]  T. Jemt Failures and complications in 391 consecutively inserted fixed prostheses supported by Brånemark implants in edentulous jaws: a study of treatment from the time of prosthesis placement to the first annual checkup. , 1992, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[14]  G. Pecora,et al.  Osseointegration of rough acid-etched titanium implants: 5-year follow-up of 100 minimatic implants. , 1999, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[15]  Y. Çiftçi,et al.  The effect of veneering materials on stress distribution in implant-supported fixed prosthetic restorations. , 2000, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[16]  C. Cobb,et al.  Comparison of peri-implant stresses transmitted by four commercially available osseointegrated implants. , 1989, The international journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.

[17]  M R Rieger,et al.  Bone stress distribution for three endosseous implants. , 1989, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[18]  Werner Zechner,et al.  Three-dimensional finite element analysis of implant stability in the atrophic posterior maxilla: a mathematical study of the sinus floor augmentation. , 2002, Clinical oral implants research.

[19]  O. Miyakawa,et al.  Influence of restoration type on stress distribution in bone around implants: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. , 1998, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[20]  R. Mericske-Stern,et al.  Occlusal force and oral tactile sensibility measured in partially edentulous patients with ITI implants. , 1996, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[21]  H. Iplikçioğlu,et al.  Comparative evaluation of the effect of diameter, length and number of implants supporting three-unit fixed partial prostheses on stress distribution in the bone. , 2002, Journal of dentistry.

[22]  I Akpinar,et al.  A comparison of stress and strain distribution characteristics of two different rigid implant designs for distal-extension fixed prostheses. , 1996, Quintessence international.

[23]  Sullivan Dy Prosthetic considerations for the utilization of osseointegrated fixtures in the partially edentulous arch. , 1986 .

[24]  K. Akca,et al.  Evaluation of the Effect of the Residual Bone Angulation on Implant-Supported Fixed Prosthesis in Mandibular Posterior Edentulism Part II: 3-D Finite Element Stress Analysis , 2001, Implant dentistry.

[25]  R. James,et al.  The experimental verification of the efficacy of finite element modeling to dental implant systems. , 1996, The Journal of oral implantology.

[26]  F. Higginbottom,et al.  A multicenter retrospective analysis of the ITI implant system used for single-tooth replacements: preliminary results at 6 or more months of loading. , 1997, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[27]  P I Brånemark,et al.  A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. , 1981, International journal of oral surgery.

[28]  I Herrmann,et al.  A 5-year prospective multicenter follow-up report on overdentures supported by osseointegrated implants. , 1996, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[29]  Christoph Bourauel,et al.  Bone loading pattern around implants in average and atrophic edentulous maxillae: a finite-element analysis. , 2001, Journal of maxillofacial surgery.

[30]  F. Mante,et al.  Evaluating parameters of osseointegrated dental implants using finite element analysis--a two-dimensional comparative study examining the effects of implant diameter, implant shape, and load direction. , 1998, The Journal of oral implantology.

[31]  Ismail Yh,et al.  Comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional finite element analysis of a blade implant. , 1987 .

[32]  S C Bayne,et al.  3D-FEA of osseointegration percentages and patterns on implant-bone interfacial stresses. , 1997, Journal of dentistry.

[33]  D Siegele,et al.  Numerical investigations of the influence of implant shape on stress distribution in the jaw bone. , 1989, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[34]  C H Jooste,et al.  Three-dimensional finite element model of a human mandible incorporating six osseointegrated implants for stress analysis of mandibular cantilever prostheses. , 1995, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[35]  W C Van Buskirk,et al.  The Elastic Properties of a Human Mandible , 1987, Advances in dental research.

[36]  Y Akagawa,et al.  A comparative evaluation of mandibular finite element models with different lengths and elements for implant biomechanics. , 1998, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[37]  T Nakajima,et al.  Finite element analysis of the stresses around endosseous implants in various reconstructed mandibular models. , 2002, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

[38]  Makoto Shiota,et al.  The influence of implant location and length on stress distribution for three-unit implant-supported posterior cantilever fixed partial dentures. , 2004, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[39]  D Buser,et al.  The original one-stage dental implant system and its clinical application. , 1998, Periodontology 2000.

[40]  B Rangert,et al.  Bending overload and implant fracture: a retrospective clinical analysis. , 1995, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[41]  Holmes Dc,et al.  Influence of bone quality on stress distribution for endosseous implants. , 1997, The Journal of oral implantology.

[42]  A. Gilat,et al.  A photoelastic and strain gauge analysis of angled abutments for an implant system. , 1993, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[43]  R M Pilliar,et al.  Dental implant design--effect on bone remodeling. , 1991, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[44]  J. Brunski Biomechanical aspects of oral/maxillofacial implants. , 2003, The International journal of prosthodontics.