Performance Prediction of Bridge Deck Systems Using Markov Chains

Bridge management systems have adopted Markov-chain models for predicting the future condition of bridge components, systems, and networks. These models are developed based on two assumptions. First, bridge inspections are performed at predetermined and fixed time intervals i.e., constant inspection period. Second, the future bridge condition depends only on the present condition and not on the past condition i.e., state independence. This paper evaluates the impact of these assumptions on the performance prediction of bridge deck systems using field data obtained from the Ministere des Transports du Quebec. Transition probability matrices are developed for the different elements of the deck system and adjusted for the variation in the inspection period using Bayes' rule. This investigation indicated that the variation in the inspection period may result in a 22% error in predicting the service life of a bridge deck system. Also, the statistical tests used to assess the validity of the state independence assumption of Markov chains showed that this assumption is acceptable with a 95% level of confidence, which is reasonable for network level analysis.

[1]  Kamal Golabi,et al.  Pontis: A System for Maintenance Optimization and Improvement of US Bridge Networks , 1997 .

[2]  Yi Jiang,et al.  BRIDGE PERFORMANCE PREDICTION MODEL USING THE MARKOV CHAIN , 1988 .

[3]  George Morcous,et al.  Modeling Bridge Deterioration Using Case-Based Reasoning , 2002 .

[4]  J. L. Bogdanoff.  A New Cumulative Damage Model: Part 1 , 1978 .

[5]  Matthew G. Karlaftis,et al.  Probabilistic Infrastructure Deterioration Models with Panel Data , 1997 .

[6]  Hugh Hawk.  BRIDGIT deterioration models , 1995 .

[7]  Yoshito Itoh,et al.  Comparative study of optimized and conventional bridges: Life cycle cost and environmental impact , 2001 .

[8]  Lyndhurst Collins,et al.  An introduction to Markov chain analysis , 1975 .

[9]  William T. Scherer,et al.  Markovian Models for Bridge Maintenance Management , 1994 .

[10]  Dan J. Naus,et al.  2nd International RILEM Workshop on Life Prediction and Aging Management of Concrete Structures , 2003 .

[11]  Emanuel Parzen,et al.  Stochastic Processes , 1962 .

[12]  Dimitri A. Grivas,et al.  Method for Estimating Transition Probability in Bridge Deterioration Models , 1998 .

[13]  George Morcous,et al.  Identification of environmental categories for Markovian deterioration models of bridge decks , 2003 .

[14]  George Morcous,et al.  Computer Assistance in Managing the Maintenance of Low-Slope Roofs , 2003 .

[15]  Dulcy M. Abraham,et al.  CHALLENGING ISSUES IN MODELING DETERIORATION OF COMBINED SEWERS , 2001 .

[16]  D. J. Naus.  2nd International RILEM Workshop on Life Prediction and Aging Management of Concrete Structures (5-6 May 2003, Paris, France) , 2003 .

[17]  Samer Madanat,et al.  Optimal Inspection and Maintenance Policies for Infrastructure Networks , 2000 .

[18]  G. Kuczera,et al.  Markov Model for Storm Water Pipe Deterioration , 2002 .

[19]  Samuel H Carpenter,et al.  PAVEMENT PERFORMANCE PREDICTION MODEL USING THE MARKOV PROCESS , 1987 .

[20]  J. L. Bogdanoff,et al.  A New Cumulative Damage Model—Part 4 , 1980 .

[21]  Tarek Zayed,et al.  Life-Cycle Cost Analysis using Deterministic and Stochastic Methods: Conflicting Results , 2002 .

[22]  Samer Madanat,et al.  Estimation of infrastructure transition probabilities from condition rating data , 1995 .

[23]  Tarek Zayed,et al.  Statewide Performance Function for Steel Bridge Protection Systems , 2002 .