Psychophysically determined symmetric and asymmetric lifting capacity of Chinese males for one hour's work shifts

Abstract A laboratory experiment was conducted to determine the effects of asymmetric lifting on psychophysically determined maximum acceptable weight of lift (MAWL) and the resulting heart rate, oxygen uptake and rating of perceived exertion. Thirteen male college students were recruited as participants. Each participant performed 12 different lifting tasks involving three lifting frequencies (one-time maximum, 1 and 4 lifts/min) and four twisting angles (including the sagittal plane and three different angles of asymmetry, i.e., 0, 30, 60, and 90°) from the floor to a 76 cm high pallet for one hour's work shift using a free-style lifting technique. The results showed that: (1) The MAWLs were significantly lower for asymmetric lifting than for symmetric lifting in the sagittal plane. The MAWL decreased with an increase in the angle of asymmetry, however, the heart rate, oxygen uptake and RPE remained unchanged; (2) Lifting frequency had no significant effect on the percentage decrease in MAWL from the sagittal plane values. Correction factors of 4, 9, and 13% for MAWL at 0, 30, 60, and 90°of asymmetric lifting, respectively, are recommended; (3) Both the physiological costs (heart rate and oxygen uptake) and rating of perceived exertion increased with an increase in lifting frequency though maximum acceptable weight of lift decreased. The most stressed body parts were the lower back and the arm; and (4) The percentage decrease in MAWL with twisting angle for the Chinese participants was somewhat lower than those of the Occidental participants. In addition, even though there was a decrease in MAWL, heart rate and RPE increased with an increase in the angle of a symmetric lifting for the Occidental participants, it was different from that of the Chinese participants. Relevance to industry It is generally believed that asymmetric lifting involving torso twisting is more harmful to back spine than symmetric lifting. However, the previous studies were conducted in Europe and North America, and the data were obtained from the Caucasian populations. This work, therefore, aims to investigate the influence of asymmetric lifting on the lifting capacity of the Chinese participants, and to compare the differences with the Occidental populations.

[1]  D B Chaffin,et al.  Ergonomics guide for the assessment of human static strength. , 1975, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[2]  Anil Mital,et al.  Manual Materials Handling , 1989 .

[3]  Stover H. Snook,et al.  The Ergonomics Society The Society's Lecture 1978. THE DESIGN OF MANUAL HANDLING TASKS , 1978 .

[4]  Rodger J. Koppa,et al.  Maximum acceptable weight of lift for an asymmetrical combination manual handling task , 1989 .

[5]  S H Snook,et al.  Psychophysical considerations in permissible loads. , 1985, Ergonomics.

[6]  A. Garg,et al.  Maximum acceptable weights and maximum voluntary isometric strengths for asymmetric lifting. , 1986, Ergonomics.

[7]  A Mital,et al.  Maximum Acceptable Weight of Lift as a Function of Material Density, Center of Gravity Location, Hand Preference, and Frequency , 1983, Human factors.

[8]  A. Garg,et al.  Maximum acceptable weights, heart rates and RPEs for one hour's repetitive asymmetric lifting. , 1988, Ergonomics.

[9]  Anil Mital,et al.  Reach Profiles for Males and Females under Restrained and Unrestrained Conditions , 1978 .

[10]  S P Wu,et al.  Psychophysical modelling of lifting capacity of Chinese males using strength variables. , 1993, Applied ergonomics.

[11]  S. Snook,et al.  Maximum acceptable weight of lift. , 1967, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[12]  J. Anderson.  Occupational Low Back Pain , 1985 .

[13]  P. Dempsey,et al.  A critical review of biomechanical, epidemiological, physiological and psychophysical criteria for designing manual materials handling tasks. , 1998, Ergonomics.

[14]  A Mital.  Psychophysical capacity of industrial workers for lifting symmetrical and asymmetrical loads symmetrically and asymmetrically for 8 h work shifts. , 1992, Ergonomics.

[15]  John A. Roebuck,et al.  Engineering Anthropometry Methods , 1975 .

[16]  M. M. Ayoub,et al.  Establishing Physical Criteria for Assigning Personnel to Air Force Jobs , 1982 .

[17]  A Mital,et al.  Psychophysical and physiological responses to lifting symmetrical and asymmetrical loads symmetrically and asymmetrically. , 1986, Ergonomics.

[18]  F. Chen,et al.  Prediction of the maximum acceptable weight of symmetrical and asymmetrical lift using direct estimation method , 1992 .