MODELS FOR QUANTTITATIVE ASSESSMENTS OF VIDEO DETECTION SYSTEM IMPACTS ON SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION OPERATIONS

The paper presents various models for quantitative assessments of the impacts of video detection system applications at signalized intersections. The models are developed to mainly address the occlusion issue, one of the unavoidable phenomenons associated with video detection systems. Two types of occlusion scenarios and their potential impacts on intersection operations are analyzed based on typical parameter values and detection setup. The paper also addresses the limitations of video detection systems on providing advance detection. Occlusion in video detection systems can result in missing detections, false detections, and increased detector presence time, thus may affect intersection operations under actuated control. It is found that missing detections due to occlusion to the following vehicles are generally less than 5% when the approach volume is under 600 vphpl and the percentage of trucks is under 5%. At this traffic volume level, additional phase extension time caused by occlusion is generally less than 3 seconds. To minimize false detections due to occlusion to adjacent lanes, the horizontal offset between the camera and the travel lane should be at the minimum, with an ideal mast-arm mounting and positioning to the division line between the lanes. Due to limitations on the achievable camera height and mounting angle, using one camera is found to be difficult to satisfy the required advance detection for speeds above 50 mph. It should be noted that the paper does not address the impacts of physical limits of video detection systems such as pixel size, grayscale depth, lightning and shadows.

[1]  Yinhai Wang,et al.  Detecting Cycle Failures at Signalized Intersections Using Video Image Processing , 2006, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..

[2]  Michael P Dixon,et al.  Exploring Use of Image Analysis Technology for Evaluating Level of Service of Signalized Intersections , 2006 .

[3]  Darcy M. Bullock,et al.  Evaluation of Stop Bar Video Detection Accuracy at Signalized Intersections , 2006 .

[4]  Srinivasa R Sunkari,et al.  Evaluation of Cost-Effective Technologies for Advance Detection , 2005 .

[5]  Zong Tian,et al.  Parallax Error in Video-Image Systems , 2002 .

[6]  G. T. Kogut,et al.  Maintaining the identity of multiple vehicles as they travel through a video network , 2001, Proceedings 2001 IEEE Workshop on Multi-Object Tracking.

[7]  S. Spraggs,et al.  Traffic Engineering , 2000 .

[8]  J. Fowler,et al.  INTERSECTION DELAY MEASUREMENT USING VIDEO DETECTION SYSTEMS , 1998 .

[9]  Panos G Michalopoulos,et al.  DERIVATION OF ADVANCED TRAFFIC PARAMETERS THROUGH VIDEO IMAGING , 1997 .

[10]  Randy B Machemehl,et al.  PROBABILISTIC SPEED-ESTIMATION MEASUREMENT ERRORS THROUGH VIDEO IMAGES , 1997 .

[11]  Montasir M Abbas,et al.  DETECTION PLACEMENT AND CONFIGURATION GUIDELINES FOR VIDEO IMAGE VEHICLE DETECTION SYSTEMS , 2003 .

[12]  Patrick T McCoy,et al.  Improving Dilemma-Zone Protection of Advance Detection with Advance-Warning Flashers , 2003 .

[13]  Andrzej P. Tarko,et al.  EVALUATION OF SELECTED VIDEO DETECTION SYSTEMS AT SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS 6. Performing Organization Code , 2001 .

[14]  Thomas Urbanik,et al.  ADAPTIVE LEFT TURN PHASING , 2000 .

[15]  Norman M Baculinao,et al.  VIDEO DETECTION TECHNOLOGY : ARE THEY READY TO REPLACE LOOPS? , 1998 .

[16]  S. Maddula,et al.  EVALUATION OF SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION DELAY USING VIDEO IMAGE DETECTION , 1994 .

[17]  Rahmi Akcelik,et al.  ESTIMATION OF GREEN TIMES AND CYCLE TIME FOR VEHICLE-ACTUATED SIGNALS , 1994 .