An Application Driven Comparison of Several Feature Extraction Algorithms in Bronchoscope Tracking During Navigated Bronchoscopy

This paper compares Kanade-Lucas-Tomasi (KLT), speeded up robust feature (SURF), and scale invariant feature transformation (SIFT) features applied to bronchoscope tracking. In our study, we first use KLT, SURF, or SIFT features and epipolar constraints to obtaininterframe translation (up to scale) and orientation displacements and Kalman filtering to recover an estimate for the magnitude of the motion (scale factor determination), and then multiply inter-frame motion parameters onto the previous pose of the bronchoscope camera to achieve the predicted pose, which is used to initialize intensity-based image registration to refine the current pose of the bronchoscope camera. We evaluate the KLT-, SURF-, and SIFT-based bronchoscope camera motion tracking methods on patient datasets. According to experimental results, we may conclude that SIFT features are more robust than KLT and SURF features at predicting the bronchoscope motion, and all methods for predicting the bronchoscope camera motion show a significant performance boost compared to sole intensity-based image registration without an additional position sensor.

[1]  Guang-Zhong Yang,et al.  Nonrigid 2-D/3-D Registration for Patient Specific Bronchoscopy Simulation With Statistical Shape Modeling: Phantom Validation , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[2]  K P Wang,et al.  Three-dimensional CT-guided bronchoscopy with a real-time electromagnetic position sensor: a comparison of two image registration methods. , 2000, Chest.

[3]  Matthijs C. Dorst Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints , 2011 .

[4]  Cordelia Schmid,et al.  A Performance Evaluation of Local Descriptors , 2005, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[5]  Daisuke Deguchi,et al.  Selective image similarity measure for bronchoscope tracking based on image registration , 2009, Medical Image Anal..

[6]  Raúl Rojas,et al.  Kalman filter for vision tracking , 2005 .

[7]  Luc Van Gool,et al.  Speeded-Up Robust Features (SURF) , 2008, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[8]  Carlo Tomasi,et al.  Good features to track , 1994, 1994 Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[9]  Jun Sugiyama,et al.  Tracking of a bronchoscope using epipolar geometry analysis and intensity-based image registration of real and virtual endoscopic images , 2002, Medical Image Anal..

[10]  Darius Burschka,et al.  Scale-Invariant Registration of Monocular Endoscopic Images to CT-Scans for Sinus Surgery , 2004, MICCAI.

[11]  Niko Sünderhauf,et al.  COMPARING SEVERAL IMPLEMENTATIONS OF TWO RECENTLY PUBLISHED FEATURE DETECTORS , 2007 .

[12]  Bernhard P. Wrobel,et al.  Multiple View Geometry in Computer Vision , 2001 .