“The moment he realized he needed our joint assistance made the difference”: a multiple case study into working elements in the supervision of probation clients with debt

Purpose Little is known about effective supervision of offenders with debt. This multiple case study aims to gain insight into working elements in offender supervision on debt. This is important for probation officers to choose the most effective interventions in daily offender supervision. Design/methodology/approach This study included five best practice cases based on both interviews with involved professionals and clients and client file information. One case was described in detail to illustrate what probation officers and clients encounter when working on debt. All five cases were analyzed thematically using pattern matching techniques and crosscase syntheses on debt background, current supervision, barriers and working elements. Findings Organization processes and lack of aftercare hinder effective supervision. Close collaboration with other professionals (e.g. debt counselors) is important in supervising clients with debt. The client’s own behavior and motivation for supervision are crucial in the success of debt supervision and can be both hindering and effective. Working elements in supervision depend on personal characteristics of professionals involved and on the extent to which elements of a working alliance, particularly trust and bonding, are built. Practical implications Support and facilitation from probation organizations regarding primary conditions and collaboration, training professionals in methods of stimulating clients motivation and an effective working alliance are essential to supervise clients with debt adequately. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, no other in-depth study has yet been conducted on working elements in supervision of probationers with debt.

[1]  M. Huibers,et al.  The Price of Mistrust: A Study into the Working Alliance as Predictor for Recidivism , 2021, Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology.

[2]  D. van de Mheen,et al.  How to Assist Probationers with Debt Problems during Supervision? A Qualitative Study into the Experiences of Both Probation Officers and Clients , 2021, Crime & Delinquency.

[3]  D. van de Mheen,et al.  How Serious Is Debt Among Probation Clients? A Study Into the Prevalence and Scope of Debt in a Dutch Probation Sample , 2020, International journal of offender therapy and comparative criminology.

[4]  D. van de Mheen,et al.  The relationship between debt and crime: A systematic and scoping review , 2020 .

[5]  Emma Sleath,et al.  A systematic review into the effectiveness of Integrated Offender Management , 2020, Criminology & Criminal Justice.

[6]  V. de Vogel,et al.  Improving continuity of forensic mental health care , 2019, Journal of Forensic Practice.

[7]  Jane Dominey Probation supervision as a network of relationships: Aiming to be thick, not thin , 2019, Probation Journal.

[8]  Sarah D. Brown,et al.  Staff and offender perspectives of Integrated Offender Management and the impact of its introduction on arrests and risk of reoffending in one police force region , 2019 .

[9]  S. Lewis Exploring positive working relationships in light of the aims of probation, using a collaborative approach , 2014 .

[10]  J. Skeem,et al.  Firm, fair, and caring officer-offender relationships protect against supervision failure. , 2012, Law and human behavior.

[11]  Ioan Durnescu What matters most in probation supervision: Staff characteristics, staff skills or programme? , 2012 .

[12]  D. Andrews The Risk-Need-Responsivity (RNR) Model of Correctional Assessment and Treatment , 2011 .

[13]  A. Horvath Alliance in Common Factor Land: A view through the research lens * , 2011 .

[14]  Francis T. Cullen,et al.  From Nothing Works to What Works: Changing Professional Ideology in the 21st Century , 2001 .

[15]  S. Fazel,et al.  Epidemiology and Risk Factors for Violence in People with Mental Disorders , 2019 .