Power and loss aversion

Four experiments tested the prediction that power reduces loss aversion by increasing the anticipated value of gains and shrinking the negative anticipated value of losses. Experiment 1 provided initial support for the prediction that those in power are less loss averse by replicating a classic paradigm of loss aversion in riskless choice and demonstrating moderation by power. Experiments 2 and 3 expanded on this finding by breaking apart the components of loss aversion to determine how power may reduce it: via gains, losses, or both. Across two scenarios and two different measures of anticipated value, power reduced the anticipated threat associated with a loss. However, the prediction that power increases the anticipated value of gains was not supported. Finally, Experiment 4 replicated the results of Experiments 2 and 3 in the context of a choice with real consequences for the participants. Implications of these findings are discussed.

[1]  Adam D. Galinsky,et al.  Illusory Control , 2008, Psychological science.

[2]  J. Krosnick Response strategies for coping with the cognitive demands of attitude measures in surveys , 1991 .

[3]  Joe C Magee,et al.  Power and the objectification of social targets. , 2008, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[4]  E. Higgins Beyond pleasure and pain. , 1997, The American psychologist.

[5]  Arthur B. Markman,et al.  The Devaluation Effect: Activating a Need Devalues Unrelated Objects , 2003 .

[6]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Anomalies: The Endowment Effect, Loss Aversion, and Status Quo Bias , 1991 .

[7]  Robert Jervis,et al.  Political Implications of Loss Aversion , 1992 .

[8]  A. Tversky,et al.  Choices, Values, and Frames , 2000 .

[9]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk , 1979 .

[10]  Terrance Odean,et al.  Are Investors Reluctant to Realize Their Losses? , 1996 .

[11]  B. Mellers,et al.  Anticipated Emotions as Guides to Choice , 2001 .

[12]  Yaacov Trope,et al.  You focus on the forest when you're in charge of the trees: power priming and abstract information processing. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[13]  Philip E. Tetlock,et al.  Pre- to postelection shifts in presidential rhetoric: Impression management or cognitive adjustment. , 1981 .

[14]  Joe C Magee,et al.  From power to action. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[15]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Affective Forecasting , 2005 .

[16]  K. Vohs,et al.  Case Western Reserve University , 1990 .

[17]  H. Markus,et al.  You Can ’ t Always Get What You Want : Educational Attainment , Agency , and Choice , 2005 .

[18]  J. Bargh,et al.  Attractiveness of the underling: an automatic power --> sex association and its consequences for sexual harassment and aggression. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[19]  Cameron Anderson,et al.  Power, Approach, and Inhibition , 2003 .

[20]  D. Bernoulli Exposition of a New Theory on the Measurement of Risk , 1954 .

[21]  A. Tversky,et al.  Choice in Context: Tradeoff Contrast and Extremeness Aversion , 1992 .

[22]  Effects of power on perceived and objective group variability: evidence that more powerful groups are more variable. , 2002 .

[23]  R. Emerson Power-Dependence Relations , 1962, Power in Modern Societies.

[24]  Wim B. G. Liebrand,et al.  The effect of social motives, communication and group size on behaviour in an N-person multi-stage mixed-motive game , 1984 .

[25]  Katie A. Liljenquist,et al.  Power reduces the press of the situation: implications for creativity, conformity, and dissonance. , 2008, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[26]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect Theory : An Analysis of Decision under Risk Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[27]  Jennifer Aaker,et al.  Empathy Versus Price: The Influence of Emotional Appeals Across Cultures , 1998 .

[28]  When power does not corrupt: superior individuation processes among powerful perceivers. , 2001 .

[29]  Stephanos Bibas,et al.  Plea Bargaining Outside the Shadow of Trial , 2004 .

[30]  N. Liberman,et al.  Predicting the intensity of losses vs. non-gains and non-losses vs. gains in judging fairness and value: A test of the loss aversion explanation , 2005 .

[31]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Well-being : the foundations of hedonic psychology , 1999 .

[32]  Adam D. Galinsky,et al.  8 Social Hierarchy: The Self‐Reinforcing Nature of Power and Status , 2008 .

[33]  C. Carver,et al.  Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS Scales , 1994 .

[34]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  The Future Is Now: Temporal Correction in Affective Forecasting☆ , 2002 .

[35]  A. Erez,et al.  The influence of positive affect on the components of expectancy motivation. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[36]  John Madden,et al.  Neurobiology of learning, emotion, and affect , 1991 .

[37]  M. Snyder,et al.  Power in stereotypically masculine domains: a Social Influence Strategy X Stereotype Match model. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[38]  E. Higgins,et al.  Transfer of value from fit. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[39]  Bernd H. Schmitt,et al.  Culture-Dependent Assimilation and Differentiation of the Self , 2001 .

[40]  A. Tversky,et al.  Loss Aversion in Riskless Choice: A Reference-Dependent Model , 1991 .

[41]  A. Kusserow De‐Homogenizing American Individualism: Socializing Hard and Soft Individualism in Manhattan and Queens , 1999 .

[42]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Immune neglect: a source of durability bias in affective forecasting. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[43]  A. Galinsky,et al.  Lacking Power Impairs Executive Functions , 2008, Psychological science.

[44]  B. M. Staw The Escalation of Commitment To a Course of Action , 1981 .

[45]  Cameron Anderson,et al.  The experience of power: examining the effects of power on approach and inhibition tendencies. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[46]  J. Bargh,et al.  Attitudes and Social Cognition Relationship Orientation as a Moderator of the Effects of Social Power , 2022 .

[47]  J. Sonnemans,et al.  Value Orientations, Expectations and Voluntary Contributions in Public Goods. , 1996 .

[48]  N. Liberman,et al.  Imagining How You’d Feel: The Role of Motivational Experiences from Regulatory Fit , 2004, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[49]  Dorwin Cartwright,et al.  Studies in Social Power. , 1960 .

[50]  Steven P. Croley,et al.  THE NONPECUNIARY COSTS OF ACCIDENTS: PAIN-AND-SUFFERING DAMAGES IN TORT LAW , 1995 .

[51]  Emma Soane,et al.  Traders, managers and loss aversion in investment banking: a field study , 2002 .

[52]  Joe C Magee,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Power and Perspectives Not Taken , 2022 .

[53]  Sandra J. Milberg,et al.  Recipient's Mood, Relationship Type, and Helping , 1987 .

[54]  J. Brockner,et al.  Value from hedonic experience and engagement. , 2006, Psychological review.

[55]  J. R. French,et al.  The bases of social power. , 1959 .

[56]  Jennifer L. Berdahl,et al.  Effects of power on emotion and expression during a controversial group discussion , 2006 .

[57]  M. F. Luce,et al.  Constructive Consumer Choice Processes , 1998 .

[58]  Adam D. Galinsky,et al.  Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.324 Power, optimism, and risk-taking , 2022 .