Getting "fumpered": Classifying objects by what has been done to them.

Every object acquires its shape from some kind of generative process, such as manufacture, biological growth, or self-organization, in response to external forces. Inferring such generative processes from an observed shape is computationally challenging because a given process can lead to radically different shapes, and similar shapes can result from different generative processes. Here, we suggest that in some cases, generative processes endow objects with distinctive statistical features that observers can use to classify objects according to what has been done to them. We found that from the very first trials in an eight-alternative forced-choice classification task, observers were extremely good at classifying unfamiliar objects by the transformations that had shaped them. Further experiments show that the shape features underlying this ability are distinct from Euclidean shape similarity and that observers can separate and voluntarily respond to both aspects of objects. Our findings suggest that perceptual organization processes allow us to identify salient statistical shape features that are diagnostic of generative processes. By so doing, we can classify objects we have never seen before according to the processes that shaped them.

[1]  James H Elder,et al.  Shape from Contour: Computation and Representation. , 2018, Annual review of vision science.

[2]  R. Fleming,et al.  Visual Features in the Perception of Liquids , 2018, Current Biology.

[3]  Dedre Gentner,et al.  The role of comparison in preschoolers' novel object categorization. , 2010, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[4]  N. Kriegeskorte,et al.  Visual features as stepping stones toward semantics: Explaining object similarity in IT and perception with non-negative least squares , 2015, Neuropsychologia.

[5]  Sandra R. Waxman,et al.  Linguistic biases and the establishment of conceptual hierarchies: Evidence from preschool children , 1990 .

[6]  Joshua B. Tenenbaum,et al.  Human-level concept learning through probabilistic program induction , 2015, Science.

[7]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  Object name Learning Provides On-the-Job Training for Attention , 2002, Psychological science.

[8]  Filipp Schmidt,et al.  Inferring the stiffness of unfamiliar objects from optical, shape, and motion cues. , 2017, Journal of vision.

[9]  Roland W Fleming,et al.  Concavities, negative parts, and the perception that shapes are complete. , 2013, Journal of vision.

[10]  N. Chater,et al.  Similarity as transformation , 2003, Cognition.

[11]  J. Tenenbaum,et al.  Word learning as Bayesian inference. , 2007, Psychological review.

[12]  Charles Kemp,et al.  Abstraction and Relational learning , 2009, NIPS.

[13]  Filipp Schmidt,et al.  Identifying shape transformations from photographs of real objects , 2018, PloS one.

[14]  Baingio Pinna,et al.  New Gestalt Principles of Perceptual Organization: An Extension from Grouping to Shape and Meaning1 , 2010 .

[15]  Adam S. Lowet,et al.  Seeing structure: Shape skeletons modulate perceived similarity , 2018, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[16]  Denis G. Pelli,et al.  ECVP '07 Abstracts , 2007, Perception.

[17]  Joshua B. Tenenbaum,et al.  A Generative Theory of Similarity , 2005 .

[18]  Baingio Pinna,et al.  Material properties from contours: New insights on object perception , 2015, Vision Research.

[19]  E. J. Green,et al.  A Layered View of Shape Perception , 2015, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[20]  J. Wagemans,et al.  Generalization of visual shapes by flexible and simple rules. , 2012, Seeing and perceiving.

[21]  Joshua B. Tenenbaum,et al.  One-shot learning by inverting a compositional causal process , 2013, NIPS.

[22]  Joshua B. Tenenbaum,et al.  One-Shot Learning with a Hierarchical Nonparametric Bayesian Model , 2011, ICML Unsupervised and Transfer Learning.

[23]  Filipp Schmidt,et al.  Visual perception of shape altered by inferred causal history , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[24]  Shimon Ullman,et al.  Image interpretation by a single bottom-up top-down cycle , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  Jonas Kubilius,et al.  Deep Neural Networks as a Computational Model for Human Shape Sensitivity , 2016, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[26]  Michael Leyton,et al.  Inferring Causal History from Shape , 1989, Cogn. Sci..

[27]  Ulrike Hahn,et al.  Transformation Direction Influences Shape-Similarity Judgments , 2009, Psychological science.

[28]  Charles Kemp,et al.  A probabilistic account of exemplar and category generation , 2013, Cognitive Psychology.

[29]  Johan Wagemans,et al.  Perceived Shape Similarity among Unfamiliar Objects and the Organization of the Human Object Vision Pathway , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[30]  Felice L. Bedford,et al.  Object Identity, Apparent Motion, Transformation Geometry , 2010 .

[31]  Feldman,et al.  The Structure of Perceptual Categories , 1997, Journal of mathematical psychology.

[32]  Jeffrey N. Rouder,et al.  Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[33]  Shimon Edelman,et al.  Learning as formation of low-dimensional representation spaces , 1997 .

[34]  E. Wagenmakers,et al.  A default Bayesian hypothesis test for correlations and partial correlations , 2012, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[35]  J. Feldman,et al.  Superordinate shape classification using natural shape statistics , 2011, Cognition.

[36]  R. Fleming,et al.  Visual perception of complex shape-transforming processes , 2016, Cognitive Psychology.

[37]  S Imai.  Pattern similarity and cognitive transformations. , 1977, Acta psychologica.

[38]  R. Arnheim,et al.  Art and Visual Perception: A Psychology of the Creative Eye. , 1956 .

[39]  Vivian C. Paulun,et al.  Shape, motion, and optical cues to stiffness of elastic objects. , 2017, Journal of vision.

[40]  David D. Cox,et al.  Untangling invariant object recognition , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[41]  Jacob Feldman,et al.  Constructing perceptual categories , 1992, Proceedings 1992 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[42]  John A. Pyles,et al.  Exploration of complex visual feature spaces for object perception , 2014, Front. Comput. Neurosci..