Explorer The Edinburgh Consensus : Preparing for the advent of disease-modifying therapies for Alzheimer ' s disease

Context: This commentary discusses the implications of disease-modifying treatments for Alzheimer’s disease which seem likely to appear in the next few years and results from a meeting of British experts in neurodegenerative diseases in Edinburgh. The availability of such treatments would help change public and professional attitudes and accelerate engagement with the prodromal and preclinical populations who might benefit from them. However, this would require an updated understanding of Alzheimer’s disease, namely the important distinction between Alzheimer’s disease and Alzheimer’s dementia. Consensus: Since treatments are likely to be most effective in the early stages, identification of clinically relevant brain changes (for example, amyloid burden using imaging or cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers) will be crucial. While current biomarkers could be useful in identifying eligibility for new therapies, trial data are not available to aid decisions about stopping or continuing treatment in clinical practice. Therefore, effective monitoring of safety and effectiveness when these treatments are introduced into clinical practice will be necessary to inform wide-scale use. Equity of access is key but there is a tension between universal access for everyone with a diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease and specifying an eligible population most likely to respond. We propose the resources necessary for an optimal care pathway as well as the necessary education and training for primary and secondary care. Conclusion: The majority of current services in the UK and elsewhere would not be able to accommodate the specialist investigations required to select patients and prescribe these therapies. Therefore, a stepped approach would be necessary: from innovating sentinel clinical-academic centres that already have capacity to deliver the necessary phase IV trials, through early adoption in a hub and spoke model, to nationwide adoption for true equity of access. The optimism generated by recent and anticipated developments in the understanding and treatment of Alzheimer’s disease presents a great opportunity to innovate and adapt our services to incorporate the next exciting development in the field of dementia.

[1]  B. de Strooper,et al.  Alzheimer's disease: where next for anti-amyloid therapies? , 2017, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[2]  Chengjie Xiong,et al.  The DIAN-TU Next Generation Alzheimer's prevention trial: Adaptive design and disease progression model , 2017, Alzheimer's & Dementia.

[3]  B. Dubois,et al.  PRECISION MEDICINE - The Golden Gate for Detection, Treatment and Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease. , 2016, The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease.

[4]  Azeem Majeed,et al.  Rethinking primary care’s gatekeeper role , 2016, British Medical Journal.

[5]  K. Rhodes,et al.  The antibody aducanumab reduces Aβ plaques in Alzheimer’s disease , 2016, Nature.

[6]  J. Cummings,et al.  Alzheimer's drug-development pipeline: 2016 , 2016, Alzheimer's & dementia.

[7]  K. Blennow,et al.  CSF and blood biomarkers for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2016, The Lancet Neurology.

[8]  José Luis Molinuevo,et al.  Development of interventions for the secondary prevention of Alzheimer's dementia: the European Prevention of Alzheimer's Dementia (EPAD) project. , 2016, The lancet. Psychiatry.

[9]  K. Yaffe,et al.  Is late-onset Alzheimer's disease really a disease of midlife? , 2015, Alzheimer's & dementia.

[10]  K. Blennow,et al.  Amyloid biomarkers in Alzheimer's disease. , 2015, Trends in pharmacological sciences.

[11]  Craig Ritchie,et al.  Plasma and cerebrospinal fluid amyloid beta for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease dementia and other dementias in people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). , 2014, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[12]  M. Prince,et al.  The Global Impact of Dementia 2013-2050 , 2013 .

[13]  G. Mead,et al.  Systematic review of the body of evidence for the use of biomarkers in the diagnosis of dementia , 2013, Alzheimer's & Dementia.

[14]  Nick C Fox,et al.  The diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer’s disease: Recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer's disease , 2011, Alzheimer's & Dementia.

[15]  Denise C. Park,et al.  Toward defining the preclinical stages of Alzheimer’s disease: Recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer's disease , 2011, Alzheimer's & Dementia.

[16]  B. Winblad,et al.  Alzheimer's disease: clinical trials and drug development , 2010, The Lancet Neurology.

[17]  L. Whalley,et al.  A life-course approach to the aetiology of late-onset dementias , 2006, The Lancet Neurology.