The Barthel ADL Index: a standard measure of physical disability?

There is no agreed single measure of physical disability for use either clinically or in research. It is argued that acceptance of a single standard measure of activities of daily living (ADL) might increase awareness of disability, improve clinical management of disabled patients, and might even increase acceptance of published research. The Barthel ADL Index is proposed as the standard index for clinical and research purposes. Its validity, reliability, sensitivity, and utility are discussed. The Barthel Index is as good as any other single simple index, and should be adopted as the standard against which future indices are compared. The temptation to use variations on the standard Barthel Index should be resisted.

[1]  J. Grotta,et al.  Graded neurologic scale for use in acute hemispheric stroke treatment protocols. , 1987, Stroke.

[2]  J. Stewart,et al.  Stroke recovery: he can but does he? , 1979, Rheumatology and rehabilitation.

[3]  D. Wade,et al.  Depressed Mood After Stroke , 1987, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[4]  Granger Cv,et al.  Stroke rehabilitation: analysis of repeated Barthel index measures. , 1979, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[5]  A. Bebbington.  Scaling indices of disablement. , 1977, British journal of preventive & social medicine.

[6]  D. Duckworth.  The measurement of disability by means of summed ADL indices. , 1980, International rehabilitation medicine.

[7]  J. Alexander,et al.  Characteristics of elderly people admitted to hospital, Part III homes, and sheltered housing. , 1979, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[8]  A. Prange,et al.  Proposal for summing the incapacity status or environmental status scores , 1984, Acta neurologica Scandinavica. Supplementum.

[9]  E. Hamrin,et al.  I. Evaluation of the functional capacity of stroke patients through an activity index. , 1982, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[10]  Robert John Zagar,et al.  Clinical exercise trial for stroke patients. , 1983, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[11]  D. Wade,et al.  Use of Hospital Resources by Acute Stroke Patients , 1985, Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London.

[12]  M. Reding,et al.  The Dexamethasone Suppression Test: An Indicator of Depression in Stroke but Not a Predictor of Rehabilitation Outcome , 1985 .

[13]  A R Feinstein,et al.  Scientific and clinical problems in indexes of functional disability. , 1986, Annals of internal medicine.

[14]  Yang Wc,et al.  Stroke rehabilitation: correlation and prognostic value of computerized tomography and sequential functional assessments. , 1984 .

[15]  T W Meade,et al.  Remedial therapy after stroke: a randomised controlled trial. , 1981, British medical journal.

[16]  Outcome of comprehensive medical rehabilitation: an analysis based upon the impairment, disability, and handicap model. , 1985, International rehabilitation medicine.

[17]  D. Wade,et al.  CONTROLLED TRIAL OF A HOME-CARE SERVICE FOR ACUTE STROKE PATIENTS , 1985, The Lancet.

[18]  R L Hewer,et al.  Recovery after stroke--the first 3 months. , 1985, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[19]  D. Wade,et al.  Effects of living with and looking after survivors of a stroke. , 1986, British medical journal.

[20]  Mahoney Fi,et al.  FUNCTIONAL EVALUATION: THE BARTHEL INDEX. , 1965 .

[21]  D. Wade,et al.  Social activities after stroke: measurement and natural history using the Frenchay Activities Index. , 1985, International rehabilitation medicine.

[22]  D. Wade,et al.  The Barthel ADL Index: a reliability study. , 1988, International disability studies.

[23]  S. Shapiro,et al.  PA Randomized Trial of Team Care Following Stroke , 1984, Stroke.

[24]  R L Hewer,et al.  Functional abilities after stroke: measurement, natural history and prognosis , 2012, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

[25]  J. Osberg,et al.  Program evaluation of physical medicine and rehabilitation departments using self-report Barthel. , 1986, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[26]  B. White,et al.  A MEASURE OF DISABILITY. , 1964, Archives of environmental health.

[27]  G. Kinsella,et al.  Repeatability and validity of a modified activities of daily living (ADL) index in studies of chronic disability. , 1979, International rehabilitation medicine.

[28]  C. Granger,et al.  Outcome of comprehensive medical rehabilitation: measurement by PULSES profile and the Barthel Index. , 1979, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[29]  Lippincott Williams Wilkins,et al.  Multicenter Trial of Hemodilution in Ischemic Stroke — Background and Study Protocol , 1985, Stroke.

[30]  Gresham Ge,et al.  A unified ADL evaluation form. , 1973 .

[31]  D. Wade,et al.  Therapy after stroke: amounts, determinants and effects. , 1984, International rehabilitation medicine.

[32]  T. Carnwath,et al.  Psychiatric morbidity among spouses of patients with stroke. , 1987, British medical journal.

[33]  F. Nouri,et al.  Measuring disability after a stroke. , 1985, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[34]  D. Wade,et al.  Services for stroke patients one year after stroke. , 1986, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[35]  L. Branch,et al.  Predicting the stroke patient's ability to live independently. , 1982, Stroke.

[36]  G. E. Gresham,et al.  ADL status in stroke: relative merits of three standard indexes. , 1980, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[37]  D Shinar,et al.  Reliability of the activities of daily living scale and its use in telephone interview. , 1988, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.