Turbulent Navier–Stokes analysis of an oscillating wing in a power-extraction regime using the shear stress transport turbulence model

A wing that is simultaneously heaving and pitching may extract energy from an oncoming air or water stream. The aerodynamic performance of this device in terms of extracted power and energy conversion efficiency is here investigated by means of time-dependent turbulent flow simulations performed with a compressible Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes research solver using the K − ω shear stress transport model of Menter for the turbulence closure. Previous studies of this device have focused primarily on laminar flow regimes, and only recently systematic turbulent flow analyses of this device have appeared. This paper presents comparative computational fluid dynamics analyses of the energy extraction process in a fully turbulent and a fully laminar flow regime. Presented results highlight that (a) substantial differences of the flow aerodynamics exist between the two cases, (b) the efficiency of the device in the considered turbulent and laminar regimes achieves values of about 40% and 34% respectively, in line with the findings of previous independent studies, and (c) further improvement of the efficiency observed in the turbulent regime may be achieved by optimizing the kinematic characteristics of the device including turbulent Reynolds number effects in the flow analyses used for the optimization. On the algorithmic and modeling sides, the analyses make use of a computationally efficient method for the fully coupled semi-implicit integration of the time-dependent Navier–Stokes equations and the two equations of the K − ω shear stress transport model. The paper also provides a systematic assessment of the impact of the turbulent wall boundary condition for the specific dissipation rate on the computed flow field. It is highlighted that the solution variations due to particular choices of this boundary condition may be higher than those caused by the use of different turbulence models.

[1]  P. Spalart.  Strategies for turbulence modelling and simulations , 2000 .

[2]  James DeLaurier,et al.  Wingmill: An Oscillating-Wing Windmill , 1981 .

[3]  T. Kinsey,et al.  Parametric Study of an Oscillating Airfoil in a Power-Extraction Regime , 2008 .

[4]  Seungsoo Lee,et al.  On coupling the Reynolds‐averaged Navier–Stokes equations with two‐equation turbulence model equations , 2006 .

[5]  Mark D. Sanetrik,et al.  Time-accurate Navier-Stokes calculations with multigrid acceleration , 1993 .

[6]  A. J. Wadcock.  Structure of the Turbulent Separated Flow Around a Stalled Airfoil , 1979 .

[7]  Antony Jameson,et al.  Solution of the Euler equations for complex configurations , 1983 .

[8]  Xiaoqing Zheng,et al.  Staggered finite volume scheme for solving cascade flow with a k-omega turbulence model , 1994 .

[9]  J. B. Greenberg,et al.  A robust implicit multigrid method for RANS equations with two-equation turbulence models , 2010, J. Comput. Phys..

[10]  M. Sergio Campobasso,et al.  Analysis of Unsteady Flows Past Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine Airfoils Based on Harmonic Balance Compressible Navier-Stokes Equations With Low-Speed Preconditioning , 2012 .

[11]  A. N. Athanasiadis,et al.  One- and two-equation turbulence models for the prediction of complex cascade flows using unstructured grids , 2003 .

[12]  Max F. Platzer,et al.  Numerical Analysis of an Oscillating-Wing Wind and Hydropower Generator , 2011 .

[13]  Max F. Platzer,et al.  Development of a New Oscillating-Wing Wind and Hydropower Generator , 2009 .

[14]  Jang-Hyuk Kwon,et al.  Implementation of k-w Turbulence Models in an Implicit Multigrid Method , 2004 .

[15]  H. Lomax,et al.  Thin-layer approximation and algebraic model for separated turbulent flows , 1978 .

[16]  W. Jones,et al.  The calculation of low-Reynolds-number phenomena with a two-equation model of turbulence , 1973 .

[17]  Feng Liu,et al.  A Strongly Coupled Time-Marching Method for Solving the Navier—Stokes andk-ω Turbulence Model Equations with Multigrid , 1996 .

[18]  Esteban Ferrer,et al.  CFD predictions of transition and distributed roughness over a wind turbine airfoil , 2009 .

[19]  D. Wilcox.  Formulation of the k-w Turbulence Model Revisited , 2008 .

[20]  M. Sergio Campobasso,et al.  Ad-Hoc Boundary Conditions for CFD Analyses of Turbomachinery Problems With Strong Flow Gradients at Farfield Boundaries , 2011 .

[21]  T. Barth,et al.  A one-equation turbulence transport model for high Reynolds number wall-bounded flows , 1990 .

[22]  Philippe Viarouge,et al.  Prototype testing of a hydrokinetic turbine based on oscillating hydrofoils , 2011 .

[23]  John A. Ekaterinaris,et al.  Computation of oscillating airfoil flows with one- and two-equation turbulence models , 1994 .

[24]  Fotis Sotiropoulos,et al.  Strongly-Coupled Multigrid Method for 3-D Incompressible Flows Using Near-Wall Turbulence Closures , 1997 .

[25]  P. Spalart.  A One-Equation Turbulence Model for Aerodynamic Flows , 1992 .

[26]  Max F. Platzer,et al.  An investigation of the fluid-structure interaction in an oscillating-wing micro-hydropower generator , 2003 .

[27]  Ken Badcock,et al.  Linear Frequency Domain and Harmonic Balance Predictions of Dynamic Derivatives , 2010 .

[28]  G. Dumas,et al.  Computational Fluid Dynamics Analysis of a Hydrokinetic Turbine Based on Oscillating Hydrofoils , 2012 .

[30]  Scott Schreck,et al.  Detached‐eddy simulation of flow around the NREL Phase VI blade , 2002 .

[31]  D. Wilcox.  Reassessment of the scale-determining equation for advanced turbulence models , 1988 .

[32]  F. Menter.  Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications , 1994 .

[33]  M. Sergio Campobasso,et al.  Compressible Navier-Stokes analysis of an oscillating wing in a power-extraction regime using efficient low-speed preconditioning , 2012 .