A holistic evaluation of smart city performance in the context of China

Abstract Development of smart city has been increasingly accepted as a new technology-based solution to mitigate urban diseases. The Chinese government has been devoting good efforts to the promotion of smart city through introducing a series of policies. However, policies may have limited effectiveness in application if they do not respond to the practice. There is little study examining what results have been achieved in practice by applying policy measures. This study presents a holistic evaluation of smart city performance in the context of China. The evaluation indicators in this study are selected by applying a hybrid research methodology including literature review and semi-structured interviews. Indicator data are collected from 44 sample smart cities. The evaluation was conducted by applying Entropy method and Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) technique collectively. This study highlights that the overall smart city performance in China is at a relatively low level. There is also a significant unbalance in performance between five smart city dimensions including smart infrastructure, governance, people, economy and environment. The smart performance between cities varies significantly since cities implement smart city programs in different ways. These differences impede experience sharing between cities. Actions have been recommended in this study for promoting further development of smart city in the context of China, such as increasing the investment on smart infrastructure, providing training programs, and establishing evaluation mechanism.

[1]  Alenka Poplin,et al.  The Participatory Cube: A Framework for Analysis of Online Participation Platforms , 2013 .

[2]  Bjørn Johnson,et al.  Cities, systems of innovation and economic development , 2008 .

[3]  Yi Peng,et al.  Smart city with Chinese characteristics against the background of big data: Idea, action and risk , 2018 .

[4]  Hongping Yuan,et al.  Critical indicators for assessing the contribution of infrastructure projects to coordinated urban–rural development in China , 2012 .

[5]  Haibin Yu,et al.  An overview of smart city in China , 2016, China Communications.

[6]  Theresa A. Pardo,et al.  Building Understanding of Smart City Initiatives , 2012, EGOV.

[7]  John Psarras,et al.  A Decision Support Framework for Smart Cities Energy Assessment and Optimization , 2017 .

[8]  Yin Leng Theng,et al.  Towards the Construction of Smart City Index for Analytics (SM-CIA): Pilot-Testing with Major Cities in China Using Publicly Available Data , 2016, 2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS).

[9]  Nikolaos Komninos,et al.  Intelligent Cities and Globalisation of Innovation Networks , 2008 .

[10]  Wei Sun,et al.  Risk assessment of hydropower stations through an integrated fuzzy entropy-weight multiple criteria decision making method: A case study of the Xiangxi River , 2015, Expert Syst. Appl..

[11]  R. Hollands Will the real smart city please stand up? , 2008, The Routledge Companion to Smart Cities.

[12]  Anna Corinna Cagliano,et al.  Current trends in Smart City initiatives: some stylised facts , 2014 .

[13]  Jiewei Chen Rapid urbanization in China: A real challenge to soil protection and food security , 2007 .

[14]  LiuPu,et al.  China's Smart City Pilots , 2014 .

[15]  Leonidas G. Anthopoulos,et al.  Smart utopia VS smart reality: Learning by experience from 10 smart city cases , 2017 .

[16]  Jin-Gu Pan,et al.  From Governance to Service-Smart City Evaluations in Taiwan , 2011, 2011 International Joint Conference on Service Sciences.

[17]  Tamara Kulesa A Vision of Smarter Cities : How Cities Can Lead the Way into a Prosperous and Sustainable Future Moderator : , 2009 .

[18]  J. Li,et al.  Smart city and the applications , 2011, 2011 International Conference on Electronics, Communications and Control (ICECC).

[19]  Vijay P. Singh,et al.  Evaluation of riverwater quality by entropy , 2008 .

[20]  Imam Buchori,et al.  Smart Growth, Smart City and Density: In Search of The Appropriate Indicator for Residential Density in Indonesia , 2016 .

[21]  Alberto De Marco,et al.  Digital Dashboards for Smart City Governance: A Case Project to Develop an Urban Safety Indicator Model , 2015 .

[22]  L. T. W. Hin,et al.  Creating Smart Cities with Intelligent Transportation Solutions: Experiences from Singapore , 2012 .

[23]  Mohammad Jafar Tarokh,et al.  A fuzzy VIKOR method for supplier selection based on entropy measure for objective weighting , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[24]  M. Greenstone,et al.  Evidence on the impact of sustained exposure to air pollution on life expectancy from China’s Huai River policy , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[26]  Linli Cui,et al.  Urbanization and its environmental effects in Shanghai, China , 2012 .

[27]  Nils Walravens,et al.  Qualitative indicators for smart city business models , 2015 .

[28]  G. Paquet,et al.  E-Governance and Smart Communities , 2001 .

[29]  J. Chamie,et al.  World Urbanization Prospects: The 2003 Revision , 2004 .

[30]  Paul Beaudry,et al.  Population Growth, Technological Adoption, and Economic Outcomes in the Information Era , 2002 .

[31]  Ashim Kumar Debnath,et al.  A methodological framework for benchmarking smart transport cities , 2014 .

[32]  Jayant Kalagnanam,et al.  Foundations for Smarter Cities , 2010, IBM J. Res. Dev..

[33]  Soumaya Ben Letaifa How to strategize smart cities: Revealing the SMART model ☆ , 2015 .

[34]  Xiao Han,et al.  Spatially varying patterns of afforestation/reforestation and socio-economic factors in China: a geographically weighted regression approach , 2017 .

[35]  D. Comín R&D: A Small Contribution to Productivity Growth , 2002 .

[36]  José Ramón Gil-García,et al.  Understanding Smart Cities: An Integrative Framework , 2012, HICSS.

[37]  Jung Hoon Lee,et al.  Technological Forecasting & Social Change Towards an effective framework for building smart cities : Lessons from Seoul and San Francisco , 2014 .