An Experiment Using a Circular Neighborhood to Calculate Slope Gradient from a DEM

The traditional 3 � 3 cell neighborhood used in a focal operation on a raster layer has a square shape that results in a dimensional neighborhood of which the orientation is eventually arbitrary to the physical features represented. This paper presents an experiment using a circular neighborhood to calculate slope gradient. Comparisons of the results from a circular neighborhood with the results from some traditional methods show that (a) for a smooth surface, the result from a circular neighborhood is more accurate than that from a square neighborhood, (b) a circular neighborhood is generally more sensitive to noise in the input DEM than a square neighborhood, and (c) in a validation using field measurements, the circular neighborhood performs better than the square neighborhood when the ratio of user-specified neighborhood size to cell size is high.

[1]  K. Jones.  A comparison of algorithms used to compute hill slope as a property of the DEM , 1998 .

[2]  Kevin H. Jones,et al.  A Comparison of Two Approaches to Ranking Algorithms Used to Compute Hill Slopes , 1998, GeoInformatica.

[3]  Joel L Morrison.  OBSERVED STATISTICAL TRENDS IN VARIOUS INTERPOLATION ALGORITHMS USEFUL FOR FIRST STAGE INTERPOLATION , 1974 .

[4]  I. Evans.  Statistical Characterization of Altitude Matrices by Computer. Report 6. An Integrated System of Terrain Analysis and Slope Mapping. , 1979 .

[5]  A. Zhu,et al.  Derivation of Soil Properties Using a Soil Land Inference Model (SoLIM) , 1997 .

[6]  Xuejun Liu,et al.  Analysis of errors of derived slope and aspect related to DEM data properties , 2004, Comput. Geosci..

[7]  Dan Pennock,et al.  Landform classification and soil distribution in hummocky terrain , 1987 .

[8]  C. Thorne,et al.  Quantitative analysis of land surface topography , 1987 .

[9]  J. Carter,et al.  The Effect Of Data Precision On The Calculation Of Slope And Aspect Using Gridded Dems , 1992 .

[10]  Cort J. Willmott,et al.  On the Evaluation of Model Performance in Physical Geography , 1984 .

[11]  Michael E. Hodgson,et al.  What cell size does the computed slope/aspect angle represent? , 1995 .

[12]  Berthold K. P. Horn,et al.  Hill shading and the reflectance map , 1981, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[13]  P. A. Shary,et al.  Land surface in gravity points classification by a complete system of curvatures , 1995 .

[14]  Jay Gao,et al.  Resolution and Accuracy of Terrain Representation by Grid DEMs at a Micro-Scale , 1997, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[15]  Stefan Kienzle,et al.  The Effect of DEM Raster Resolution on First Order, Second Order and Compound Terrain Derivatives , 2004, Trans. GIS.

[16]  Igor V. Florinsky,et al.  Accuracy of Local Topographic Variables Derived from Digital Elevation Models , 1998, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[17]  Wayne D. Iverson,et al.  VIEWIT: computation of seen areas, slope, and aspect for land-use planning , 1975 .