Multi-component deconvolution interferometry for data-driven prediction of seismic structural response

Abstract Prediction of structural response is necessary for evaluating condition and quantifying vulnerability of structural systems exposed to seismic loads. Traditional modeling techniques for infrastructure systems such as finite elements are typically limited by inherent modeling assumptions as well as the prohibitive computational effort required for analysis. This necessitates the development of surrogate models that serve as a basis for predicting structural response. Deconvolution interferometry is a viable data-driven approach for such a task that uses single component sensor data to generate a set of impulse response functions for a structure of interest that constitutes the required surrogate model of the structure. The resulting surrogate model aids in both dynamic characterization as well as for accurate response prediction. However, it is limited to cases where motions in various degrees of freedom of a structure can be decoupled. This decoupling requires dense sensor deployment as well as prior knowledge about the structure’s geometry. To overcome this limitation, in this paper we propose a multi-component deconvolution seismic interferometry approach to develop a surrogate model for response prediction for cases with sparse sensor deployment and limited information about the structure of interest. The resulting model incorporates various sources of uncertainties namely measurement noise, effects of variations of temperature and humidity, and human activity induced vibrations by predicting a probabilistic structural response. We demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed algorithm by applying it to field monitoring data collected from structures with sparse sensor deployment in the Groningen region of the Netherlands for a period of approximately 10 months on average.

[1]  Dimitrios Vamvatsikos,et al.  Applied Incremental Dynamic Analysis , 2004 .

[2]  Mahdi Ebrahimian,et al.  Structural System Identification of Buildings by a Wave Method Based on a Nonuniform Timoshenko Beam Model , 2015 .

[3]  Masanobu Shinozuka,et al.  Fundamentals of system identification in structural dynamics , 1989 .

[4]  Julian J. Bommer,et al.  Hazard and risk assessments for induced seismicity in Groningen , 2017, Netherlands Journal of Geosciences.

[5]  K. Wapenaar,et al.  Green's function representations for seismic interferometry , 2006 .

[6]  K. Worden,et al.  Past, present and future of nonlinear system identification in structural dynamics , 2006 .

[7]  Maria I. Todorovska,et al.  1D System identification of a 54‐story steel frame building by seismic interferometry , 2014 .

[8]  Oral Büyüköztürk,et al.  Structural damage detection using Bayesian inference and seismic interferometry , 2019, Structural Control and Health Monitoring.

[9]  Satish Nagarajaiah,et al.  Sparsity-based approaches for damage detection in plates , 2019, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing.

[10]  Oral Büyüköztürk,et al.  Continuous Monitoring of High‐Rise Buildings Using Seismic InterferometryContinuous Monitoring of High‐Rise Buildings Using Seismic Interferometry , 2017 .

[11]  G. De Roeck,et al.  Vibration Resonance and Cancellation of Simply Supported Bridges under Moving Train Loads , 2014 .

[12]  Raimondo Betti,et al.  A Hybrid Optimization Algorithm with Bayesian Inference for Probabilistic Model Updating , 2015, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..

[13]  Jerome P. Lynch,et al.  Subspace system identification of support‐excited structures—part I: theory and black‐box system identification , 2012 .

[14]  Dimitrios Vamvatsikos,et al.  Incremental dynamic analysis for estimating seismic performance sensitivity and uncertainty , 2010 .

[15]  Joel P. Conte,et al.  System Identification Study of a 7-Story Full-Scale Building Slice Tested on the UCSD-NEES Shake Table , 2011 .

[16]  Roel Snieder,et al.  Monitoring a Building Using Deconvolution Interferometry. II: Ambient‐Vibration Analysis , 2014 .

[17]  Roel Snieder,et al.  Extracting the Building Response Using Seismic Interferometry: Theory and Application to the Millikan Library in Pasadena, California , 2006 .

[18]  B. Peeters,et al.  Stochastic System Identification for Operational Modal Analysis: A Review , 2001 .

[19]  R. Ghanem,et al.  Structural-System Identification. I: Theory , 1995 .

[20]  Mahdi Ebrahimian,et al.  Wave Method for Structural Health Monitoring: Testing Using Full-Scale Shake Table Experiment Data , 2016 .

[21]  Mahdi Ebrahimian,et al.  Time‐wave velocity analysis for early earthquake damage detection in buildings: application to a damaged full‐scale RC building , 2015 .

[22]  Lennart Ljung,et al.  Nonlinear black-box modeling in system identification: a unified overview , 1995, Autom..

[23]  Richard G. Baraniuk,et al.  Data-driven semi-supervised and supervised learning algorithms for health monitoring of pipes , 2019, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing.

[24]  Satish Nagarajaiah,et al.  Sparse structural system identification method for nonlinear dynamic systems with hysteresis/inelastic behavior , 2019, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing.

[25]  Oral Büyüköztürk,et al.  Computational modeling of a unique tower in Kuwait for structural health monitoring: Numerical investigations , 2019, Structural Control and Health Monitoring.

[26]  Bruce R. Ellingwood,et al.  Performance-Based Engineering of Wood Frame Housing: Fragility Analysis Methodology , 2002 .

[27]  Roel Snieder,et al.  Monitoring a Building Using Deconvolution Interferometry. I: Earthquake‐Data Analysis , 2013 .

[28]  Mahdi Ebrahimian,et al.  Nonparametric estimation of wave dispersion in high‐rise buildings by seismic interferometry , 2014 .

[29]  John E. Mottershead,et al.  Finite Element Model Updating in Structural Dynamics , 1995 .

[30]  John E. Mottershead,et al.  Model Updating In Structural Dynamics: A Survey , 1993 .

[31]  Michael R Wisnom,et al.  Modelling complex geometry using solid finite element meshes with correct composite material orientations , 2010 .

[32]  Luca Caracoglia,et al.  A Monte Carlo based method for the dynamic “fragility analysis” of tall buildings under turbulent wind loading , 2011 .

[33]  Dimitrios Vamvatsikos,et al.  Incremental dynamic analysis , 2002 .

[34]  Ying Lei,et al.  Identification, Model Updating, and Response Prediction of an Instrumented 15-Story Steel-Frame Building , 2006 .

[35]  Michael Fehler,et al.  Detection and identification of converted modes and shallow structure mapping in the Groningen gas field , 2017 .

[36]  N. Nakata,et al.  The Ambient Seismic Field at Groningen Gas Field: An Overview from the Surface to Reservoir Depth , 2018, Seismological Research Letters.

[37]  C. Allin Cornell,et al.  Probabilistic Basis for 2000 SAC Federal Emergency Management Agency Steel Moment Frame Guidelines , 2002 .

[38]  J. Hunziker,et al.  Seismic interferometry by crosscorrelation and by multidimensional deconvolution: a systematic comparison , 2010 .

[39]  J. Bommer,et al.  A Regional Site-Response Model for the Groningen Gas Field , 2017 .

[40]  Mahdi Ebrahimian,et al.  Wave Propagation in a Timoshenko Beam Building Model , 2014 .

[41]  Hao Sun,et al.  Bayesian characterization of buildings using seismic interferometry on ambient vibrations , 2017 .

[42]  K. Wapenaar,et al.  Tutorial on seismic interferometry: Part 1 — Basic principles and applications , 2010 .

[43]  Oral Büyüköztürk,et al.  The MIT Green Building benchmark problem for structural health monitoring of tall buildings , 2018 .

[44]  James E. Braun,et al.  An Inverse Gray-Box Model for Transient Building Load Prediction , 2002 .

[45]  S. Karapetrou,et al.  Seismic response of an 8-story RC-building from ambient vibration analysis , 2015, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[46]  Bruce R. Ellingwood,et al.  Earthquake risk assessment of building structures , 2001, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[47]  Maria I. Todorovska,et al.  Structural Health Monitoring of a 54-Story Steel-Frame Building Using a Wave Method and Earthquake Records , 2015 .

[48]  Alberto Cavallo,et al.  Gray-Box Identification of Continuous-Time Models of Flexible Structures , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[49]  Ali Fuad AlJishi,et al.  Detection and identification of converted modes and source independent converted phase imaging : Groningen, The Netherlands , 2017 .