Factors influencing e-government use in non-urban areas

Evidence suggests that citizens outside larger urban centers are less prone to use the various functionalities of e-government, while they are the most likely to benefit from these services. Few studies have been performed to understand rural citizens’ attitudes. Our purpose was to identify factors that influence the use of e-government services in outlying regions in the Province of Quebec (Canada). Our study was based on a subset of attitude-related variables that were shown to be strong predictors in prior research. We performed a survey involving 1587 citizens living in four selected outlying regions of Quebec, and held two focus groups with users and non-users of e-government. Our results confirm that attitude is influenced by perceived usefulness; perceived ease of use, perceived risk and trust and that attitude is strongly related to the intention to use e-government services. These results may help to plan more effective strategies to increase use in non-urban areas.

[1]  Nan Zhang,et al.  Impact of Perceived Fit on E-Government User Evaluation: A Study with a Chinese Cultural Context , 2009, J. Glob. Inf. Manag..

[2]  Lemuria Carter,et al.  E-government Diffusion: A Comparison of Adoption Constructs , 2008, AMCIS.

[3]  Ronnie Park,et al.  Measuring Factors that Influence the Success of E-Government Initiatives , 2008, Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2008).

[4]  Jan van Dijk,et al.  Channel choice determinants; an exploration of the factors that determine the choice of a service channel in citizen initiated contacts , 2007, DG.O.

[5]  France Bélanger,et al.  The utilization of e‐government services: citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors * , 2005, Inf. Syst. J..

[6]  France Bélanger,et al.  Trustworthiness in electronic commerce: the role of privacy, security, and site attributes , 2002, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[7]  Shin-Yuan Hung,et al.  User acceptance of intergovernmental services: An example of electronic document management system , 2009, Gov. Inf. Q..

[8]  E. Malecki.  Digital development in rural areas: potentials and pitfalls $ , 2003 .

[9]  A. Strauss,et al.  The Discovery of Grounded Theory , 1967 .

[10]  Vishanth Weerakkody,et al.  E-government adoption: A cultural comparison , 2008, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[11]  Robin Gauld,et al.  The Participation Divide? Political Participation, Trust in Government, and E‐government in Australia and New Zealand , 2009 .

[12]  Daniela V. Dimitrova,et al.  Profiling the Adopters of E-Government Information and Services , 2006 .

[13]  Blair H. Sheppard,et al.  Business on a handshake , 1992 .

[14]  Jan van Dijk,et al.  Explaining the acceptance and use of government Internet services: A multivariate analysis of 2006 survey data in the Netherlands , 2008, Gov. Inf. Q..

[15]  Shin-Yuan Hung,et al.  Determinants of user acceptance of the e-Government services: The case of online tax filing and payment system , 2006, Gov. Inf. Q..

[16]  Niki Rodousakis,et al.  The link between socio-economic background and Internet use: barriers faced by low socio-economic status groups and possible solutions , 2008 .

[17]  Rana Tassabehji,et al.  Generating Citizen Trust in E-Government Security: Challenging Perceptions , 2007 .

[18]  Gyoo Gun Lim,et al.  User evaluations of tax filing web sites: A comparative study of South Korea and Turkey , 2008, Online Inf. Rev..

[19]  Paul Jen-Hwa Hu,et al.  Determinants of service quality and continuance intention of online services: The case of eTax , 2009 .

[20]  M. J. Moon.  The Evolution of E-Government among Municipalities: Rhetoric or Reality? , 2002 .

[21]  Cindy Gallois,et al.  Organizational Communication: Challenges for the New Century , 2004 .

[22]  Jyoti Choudrie,et al.  Realising e-government in the UK: rural and urban challenges , 2005, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[23]  A. Bryman.  Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: how is it done? , 2006 .

[24]  Theresa A. Pardo,et al.  Proceedings of the 8th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, Bridging Disciplines & Domains, DG.O 2007, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA, May 20-23, 2007 , 2007, DG.O.

[25]  Wolfgang E. Ebbers,et al.  Electronic government: Rethinking channel management strategies , 2008, Gov. Inf. Q..

[26]  Mohammad Chuttur,et al.  Overview of the Technology Acceptance Model: Origins, Developments and Future Directions , 2009 .

[27]  France Bélanger,et al.  Trust and Risk in eGovernment Adoption , 2008, AMCIS.

[28]  Youngjin Yoo,et al.  It's all about attitude: revisiting the technology acceptance model , 2004, Decis. Support Syst..

[29]  M. Gupta,et al.  Antecedents of paperless income tax filing by young professionals in India: an exploratory study , 2009 .

[30]  M. Shah,et al.  Issues of privacy and trust in e-commerce: Exploring customers’ perspective , 2013 .

[31]  R. McNeal,et al.  Citizen–Government Interaction and the Internet: Expectations and Accomplishments in Contact, Quality, and Trust , 2008 .

[32]  C. López-Sisniega.  Barriers to electronic government use as perceived by citizens at the municipal level in Mexico , 2009 .

[33]  Yudi Fernando,et al.  Factors influencing intention to use e-government services among citizens in Malaysia , 2009, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[34]  D. Campbell,et al.  Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. , 1959, Psychological bulletin.

[35]  Margôt Kuttschreuter,et al.  Perceived usefulness, personal experiences, risk perception and trust as determinants of adoption of e-government services in The Netherlands , 2007, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[36]  Ludwig Christian Schaupp,et al.  E-voting: from apathy to adoption , 2005, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[37]  T. Jick.  Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action. , 1979 .

[38]  Naveen Donthu,et al.  Using the technology acceptance model to explain how attitudes determine Internet usage: The role of perceived access barriers and demographics , 2006 .

[39]  D. Hindman,et al.  The Rural-Urban Digital Divide , 2000 .

[40]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  A meta-analysis of existing research on citizen adoption of e-government , 2013, Information Systems Frontiers.