VSA-II: a novel prototype of variable stiffness actuator for safe and performing robots interacting with humans

This paper presents design and performance of a novel joint based actuator for a robot run by variable stiffness actuation, meant for systems physically interacting with humans. This new actuator prototype (VSA-II) is developed as an improvement over our previously developed one reported in [9], where an optimal mechanical-control co-design principle established in [7] is followed as well. While the first version was built in a way to demonstrate effectiveness of variable impedance actuation (VIA), it had limitations in torque capacities, life cycle and implementability in a real robot. VSA-II overcomes the problem of implementability with higher capacities and robustness in design for longer life. The paper discusses design and stiffness behaviour of VSA-II in theory and experiments. A comparison of stiffness characteristics between the two actuator is discussed, highlighting the advantages of the new design. A simple, but effective PD scheme is employed to independently control joint-stiffness and joint-position of a 1-link arm. Finally, results from performed impact tests of 1- link arm are reported, showing the effectiveness of stiffness variation in controlling value of a safety metric.

[1]  J. Versace A Review of the Severity Index , 1971 .

[2]  Matthew M. Williamson,et al.  Series elastic actuators , 1995, Proceedings 1995 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Human Robot Interaction and Cooperative Robots.

[3]  Antonio Bicchi,et al.  Compliant design for intrinsic safety: general issues and preliminary design , 2001, Proceedings 2001 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Expanding the Societal Role of Robotics in the the Next Millennium (Cat. No.01CH37180).

[4]  Antonio Bicchi,et al.  Optimal Mechanical/Control Design for Safe and Fast Robotics , 2004, ISER.

[5]  Antonio Bicchi,et al.  Dealing with the Safety-Performance Tradeoff in Robot Arms Design and Control , 2004 .

[6]  Antonio Bicchi,et al.  Fast and "soft-arm" tactics [robot arm design] , 2004, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[7]  Joel E. Chestnutt,et al.  An actuator with physically variable stiffness for highly dynamic legged locomotion , 2004, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2004. Proceedings. ICRA '04. 2004.

[8]  John Kenneth Salisbury,et al.  A New Actuation Approach for Human Friendly Robot Design , 2004, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[9]  Antonio Bicchi,et al.  Design and Control of a Variable Stiffness Actuator for Safe and Fast Physical Human/Robot Interaction , 2005, Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[10]  Wen-Tung Chang,et al.  A NOTE ON GRASHOF'S THEOREM , 2005 .

[11]  Antonio Bicchi,et al.  Optimization and Fail-Safety Analysis of Antagonistic Actuation for pHRI , 2006, EUROS.

[12]  Alin Albu-Schaffer,et al.  Dummy Crash-Tests for the Evaluation of Rigid Human-Robot Impacts , 2007 .

[13]  Antonio Bicchi,et al.  Variable Impedance Actuations for Physical Human Cooperating Robots: a Comparative Analysis of Performance, Safety and Dependability , 2007 .

[14]  Antonio Bicchi,et al.  A Comparative Dependability Analysis of Antagonistic Actuation Arrangements for Enhanced Robotic Safety , 2007, Proceedings 2007 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.