The effects of hybrid online planning and L2 proficiency on video-based speaking task performance

This study investigated L2 speaking performance under three different types of task-related time pressure, with a control (Control) group narrating a video at normal playing rate, an online planning (OP) group narrating the video at a slowed playing rate, and a hybrid online planning (HOP) group which combined online planning (a slowed playing rate) with content preparedness (through prewatching the video). The results show that the HOP group outperformed the Control group regarding speech accuracy and complexity, suggesting that this form of online planning, with content preparedness, helps improve speech accuracy and complexity. In addition, L2 proficiency significantly predicted speech accuracy, specifically, among all other performance measures. The implications of these findings for language teaching and learning are discussed, particularly their relevance for the way a Conceptualiser-Formulator balance is important, and for the way proficiency can best be mobilised within task performance.

[1]  Kris Van den Branden,et al.  Task-based language education : from theory to practice , 2006 .

[2]  Mary Lou Vercellotti,et al.  The Development of Complexity, Accuracy, and Fluency in Second Language Performance: A Longitudinal Study , 2017 .

[3]  David Malvern,et al.  Investigating accommodation in language proficiency interviews using a new measure of lexical diversity , 2002 .

[4]  Bei Xiaoyue Gavin.  Chapter 3. Task readiness: Theoretical framework and empirical evidence from topic familiarity, strategic planning, and proficiency levels , 2014 .

[5]  Mohammad Javad Ahmadian,et al.  The effects of guided careful online planning on complexity, accuracy and fluency in intermediate EFL learners’ oral production: The case of English articles , 2012 .

[6]  Wouter Hulstijn,et al.  GRAMMATICAL ERRORS AS A FUNCTION OF PROCESSING CONSTRAINTS AND EXPLICIT KNOWLEDGE , 1984 .

[7]  R. Ellis.  Interlanguage Variability in Narrative Discourse: Style Shifting in the Use of the Past Tense , 1987, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[8]  Zhan Wang,et al.  Chapter 2. On-line time pressure manipulations: L2 speaking performance under five types of planning and repetition conditions , 2014 .

[9]  Alan Tonkyn,et al.  Measuring spoken language: a unit for all reasons , 2000 .

[10]  Peter Skehan,et al.  Second Language Task-Based Performance , 2018 .

[11]  R. Ellis,et al.  The Effects of Pre‐Task Planning and On‐Line Planning on Fluency, Complexity and Accuracy in L2 Monologic Oral Production , 2003 .

[12]  R. Ellis.  The Differential Effects of Three Types of Task Planning on the Fluency, Complexity, and Accuracy in L2 Oral Production , 2009 .

[13]  Rod Ellis,et al.  Planning and task performance in a second language , 2005 .

[14]  S. V. van Bonn,et al.  A multi-method analysis of evaluation criteria used to assess the speaking proficiency of graduate student instructors , 2010 .

[15]  J. Norris,et al.  Towards an Organic Approach to Investigating CAF in Instructed SLA: The Case of Complexity , 2009 .

[16]  Jeanine Treffers-Daller,et al.  Language Dominance and Lexical Diversity: How Bilinguals and L2 Learners Differ in their Knowledge and Use of French Lexical and Functional Items , 2009 .

[17]  Yasuyo Sawaki,et al.  Factor structure of the TOEFL Internet-based test , 2009 .

[18]  Peter Skehan,et al.  The Influence of Planning and Task Type on Second Language Performance , 1996, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[19]  Peter Skehan,et al.  7. Strategic and on-line planning: The influence of surprise information and task time on second language performance , 2005 .

[20]  Peter Robinson,et al.  Second language task complexity : researching the cognition hypothesis of language learning and performance , 2011 .

[21]  Michael H. Long.  In Defense of Tasks and TBLT: Nonissues and Real Issues , 2016, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics.

[22]  Hsiu-Chen Hsu,et al.  The Effect of Task Planning on L2 Performance and L2 Development in Text-Based Synchronous Computer-Mediated Communication , 2017 .

[23]  Peter Robinson,et al.  The Cognition Hypothesis, second language task demands, and the SSARC model of pedagogic task sequencing , 2015 .

[24]  Peter Skehan.  Limited Attention Capacity and Cognition , 2018, Second Language Task-Based Performance.

[25]  Tracey M. Derwing,et al.  THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN L1 FLUENCY AND L2 FLUENCY DEVELOPMENT , 2009, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[26]  Judit Kormos.  Speech production and the cognition hypothesis , 2011 .

[27]  Michael H. Long.  TBLT: Building the road as we travel , 2015 .

[28]  Pauline Foster,et al.  Task Design and Second Language Performance: The Effect of Narrative Type on Learner Output , 2008 .

[29]  Uta Mehnert,et al.  THE EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT LENGTHS OF TIME FOR PLANNING ON SECOND LANGUAGE PERFORMANCE , 1998, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[30]  Rod Ellis,et al.  Position paper: Moving task-based language teaching forward , 2017, Language Teaching.

[31]  W. Levelt,et al.  Speaking: From Intention to Articulation , 1990 .

[32]  Peter Skehan,et al.  Task Condition Effects on Advanced‐Level Foreign Language Performance , 2018, The Handbook of Advanced Proficiency in Second Language Acquisition.

[33]  David Malvern,et al.  Developmental trends in lexical diversity , 2004 .

[34]  Folkert Kuiken,et al.  Complexity, Accuracy and Fluency: Definitions, Measurement and Research. , 2012 .

[35]  Mohammad Javad Ahmadian,et al.  Task-based language teaching and learning , 2016 .

[36]  David Malvern,et al.  Measuring vocabulary diversity using dedicated software , 2000 .

[37]  Guoxing Yu,et al.  Lexical Diversity in Writing and Speaking Task Performances , 2010 .

[38]  L. Ortega.  3. What do learners plan?: Learner-driven attention to form during pre-task planning , 2005 .

[39]  Chieko Kawauchi.  5. The effects of strategic planning on the oral narratives of learners with low and high intermediate L2 proficiency , 2005 .

[40]  R. Ellis,et al.  THE EFFECTS OF PLANNING ON FLUENCY, COMPLEXITY, AND ACCURACY IN SECOND LANGUAGE NARRATIVE WRITING , 2004, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[41]  Chihiro Inoue,et al.  A comparative study of the variables used to measure syntactic complexity and accuracy in task-based research , 2016 .

[42]  Mansoor Tavakoli,et al.  The effects of simultaneous use of careful online planning and task repetition on accuracy, complexity, and fluency in EFL learners’ oral production , 2011 .

[43]  Gillian Wigglesworth,et al.  An investigation of planning time and proficiency level on oral test discourse , 1997 .

[44]  Marije Michel,et al.  Effects of Task Complexity and Interaction on L2-Performance , 2011 .

[45]  Jan H. Hulstijn,et al.  Second language fluency: speaking style or proficiency? Correcting measures of second language fluency for first language behavior , 2015 .

[46]  Martin Bygate,et al.  Sources, developments and directions of task-based language teaching , 2016 .

[47]  Rod Ellis.  1. Planning and task-based performance: Theory and research , 2005 .

[48]  Jimin Kahng,et al.  Exploring Utterance and Cognitive Fluency of L1 and L2 English Speakers: Temporal Measures and Stimulated Recall. , 2014 .

[49]  Luke Plonsky,et al.  How Big Is “Big”? Interpreting Effect Sizes in L2 Research , 2014 .

[50]  G. Crookes.  Planning and Interlanguage Variation , 1989, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[51]  Rod Ellis,et al.  6. The effects of careful within-task planning on oral and written task performance , 2005 .

[52]  Paul Meara,et al.  P-Lex: A Simple and Effective Way of Describing the lexical Characteristics of Short L2 Tests. , 2001 .