Multiobjective linear programming with context-dependent preferences

Multiobjective linear programming algorithms are typically based on value maximization. However, there is a growing body of experimental evidence showing that decision maker behavior is inconsistent with value maximization. Tversky and Simonson provide an alternative model for problems with a discrete set of choices. Their model, called the componential context model, has been shown to capture observed decision maker behavior. In this paper, an interactive multiobjective linear programming algorithm is developed which follows the rationale of Tversky and Simonson. The algorithm is illustrated with an example solved using standard linear programming software. Finally, an interactive decision support system based on this algorithm is developed to field test the usefulness of the algorithm. Results show that this algorithm compares favorably with an established algorithm in the field.

[1]  G. W. Evans,et al.  An Overview of Techniques for Solving Multiobjective Mathematical Programs , 1984 .

[2]  Ralph E. Steuer,et al.  Multiple Criteria Decision Making, Multiattribute Utility Theory: The Next Ten Years , 1992 .

[3]  John Buchanan,et al.  A naïve approach for solving MCDM problems: the GUESS method , 1997 .

[4]  H. G. Daellenbach,et al.  A comparative evaluation of interactive solution methods for multiple objective decision models , 1987 .

[5]  C. Hwang,et al.  Fuzzy Multiple Objective Decision Making: Methods And Applications , 1996 .

[6]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Anomalies: The Endowment Effect, Loss Aversion, and Status Quo Bias , 1991 .

[7]  Simon French,et al.  Multi-Objective Decision Analysis with Engineering and Business Applications , 1983 .

[8]  Jyrki Wallenius,et al.  Comparative Evaluation of Some Interactive Approaches to Multicriterion Optimization , 1975 .

[9]  John Buchanan,et al.  An Experimental Evaluation of Interactive MCDM Methods and the Decision Making Process , 1994 .

[10]  Y. Aksoy.  Interactive Multiple Objective Decision Making: A Bibliography (1965–1988) , 1990 .

[11]  P. Salminen.  Solving the discrete multiple criteria problem using linear prospect theory , 1994 .

[12]  Pekka J. Korhonen,et al.  Multiple criteria decision support: The state of research and future directions , 1992, Comput. Oper. Res..

[13]  A. Tversky,et al.  Loss Aversion in Riskless Choice: A Reference-Dependent Model , 1991 .

[14]  A. Tversky,et al.  Context-dependent preferences , 1993 .

[15]  Wan Seon Shin,et al.  Interactive multiple objective optimization: Survey I - continuous case , 1991, Comput. Oper. Res..

[16]  I. Simonson,et al.  Choice Based on Reasons: The Case of Attraction and Compromise Effects , 1989 .

[17]  R. S. Laundy,et al.  Multiple Criteria Optimisation: Theory, Computation and Application , 1989 .

[18]  W. Edwards,et al.  Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research , 1986 .

[19]  A. Tversky,et al.  Choice in Context: Tradeoff Contrast and Extremeness Aversion , 1992 .

[20]  Christopher P. Puto,et al.  Adding Asymmetrically Dominated Alternatives: Violations of Regularity & the Similarity Hypothesis. , 1981 .

[21]  R. Benayoun,et al.  Linear programming with multiple objective functions: Step method (stem) , 1971, Math. Program..