Accuracy of using 30-minute post-dialysis BUN to determine equilibrated Kt/V.

BACKGROUND The equilibrated Kt/V (eKt/V), a clinical index of hemodialysis adequacy, can be calculated by several means. The commonly used methods are second generation of natural logarithm by Daugirdas and rate adjustment methods. However these two methods used immediate post-dialysis blood urea nitrogen (BUN) (C0). The authors investigated the accuracy of 30-minute post-dialysis BUN (C30), equilibrated BUN at the end of urea rebound time, to determine the eKt/V MATERIAL AND METHOD: We measured 7 values of eKt/V in 30 hemodialysis sessions by using the 5 following methods: 1). Empirical method (Emp) 2). Smye method (Sm) 3). Daugirdas method using C0 and C30 (Dau0, Dau30) 4). Rate adjustment method using C0 and C30 (Rate0, Rate30) 5). Double Pool urea kinetic model (DP), and compared with the gold standard values calculated by the modified Direct Dialysate Quantitative method (mDDQ). RESULTS All patients had adequate hemodialysis with eKt/V (mDDQ) = 1.80 + 0.22. Compared with mDDQ, the median of absolute difference of eKt/V were Rate30 (0.10); Dau30 (0.11), Rate0 (0.11), Sm (0.11); Emp (0.13); DP (0.15); Dau0 (0.35) while the correlation coefficient (r2) were 0.926, 0.948, 0.785, 0.629, 0.551, 0.833,and 0.806 respectively. CONCLUSION By using 30-minute post-dialysis BUN to calculate, the values of eKt/V by Daugirdas and rate adjustment methods were associated with better accuracy and correlation than immediate post-dialysis BUN. In the demand of the accurate eKt/V measurement, the Dau30 and Rate30 may be the suitable method to determine the eKt/V in clinical hemodialysis.

[1]  J. Kopple,et al.  A proposed glossary for dialysis kinetics. , 1995, American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation.

[2]  J. Daugirdas,et al.  Formal analytical solution to a regional blood flow and diffusion based urea kinetic model. , 1994, ASAIO journal.

[3]  R. Hakim Assessing the adequacy of dialysis. , 1990, Kidney international.

[4]  J. Daugirdas Second generation logarithmic estimates of single-pool variable volume Kt/V: an analysis of error. , 1993, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN.

[5]  J T Daugirdas,et al.  Hemodialyzer mass transfer-area coefficients for urea increase at high dialysate flow rates. The Hemodialysis (HEMO) Study. , 1997, Kidney international.

[6]  J. Daugirdas,et al.  Quantification And Prescription General Principles , 1996 .

[7]  J T Daugirdas,et al.  Overestimation of hemodialysis dose depends on dialysis efficiency by regional blood flow but not by conventional two pool urea kinetic analysis. , 1995, ASAIO journal.

[8]  John T Daugirdas,et al.  Factors that affect postdialysis rebound in serum urea concentration, including the rate of dialysis: results from the HEMO Study. , 2004, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN.

[9]  M. Flanigan,et al.  Quantitating hemodialysis: a comparison of three kinetic models. , 1991, American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation.

[10]  R. Vanholder,et al.  Adequacy of dialysis: a critical analysis. , 1992, Kidney international.

[11]  R A Sherman,et al.  Recirculation, urea disequilibrium, and dialysis efficiency: peripheral arteriovenous versus central venovenous vascular access. , 1997, American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation.

[12]  E G Lowrie,et al.  The urea reduction ratio and serum albumin concentration as predictors of mortality in patients undergoing hemodialysis. , 1993, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  R H Barth,et al.  Direct calculation of KT/V. A simplified approach to monitoring of hemodialysis. , 1988, Nephron.

[14]  Lindsay Rm,et al.  Adequacy of dialysis. , 1988 .

[15]  S W Smye,et al.  Estimation of treatment dose in high-efficiency haemodialysis. , 1994, Nephron.

[16]  J T Daugirdas,et al.  Screening for extreme postdialysis urea rebound using the Smye method: patients with access recirculation identified when a slow flow method is not used to draw the postdialysis blood. , 1996, American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation.

[17]  J T Daugirdas,et al.  Comparison of methods to predict equilibrated Kt/V in the HEMO Pilot Study. , 1997, Kidney international.

[18]  K. Schindhelm,et al.  Patient-hemodialyzer interactions. , 1978, Transactions - American Society for Artificial Internal Organs.

[19]  F. G. Heineken,et al.  Intercompartmental Fluid Shifts in Hemodialysis Patients , 1987 .

[20]  J T Daugirdas,et al.  A regional blood circulation alternative to in-series two compartment urea kinetic modeling. , 1993, ASAIO journal.

[21]  R. Toto,et al.  Accuracy of urea removal estimated by kinetic models. , 1995, Kidney international.

[22]  G. Chertow,et al.  Development of a population-specific regression equation to estimate total body water in hemodialysis patients. , 1997, Kidney international.

[23]  L. Pedrini,et al.  Causes, kinetics and clinical implications of post-hemodialysis urea rebound. , 1988, Kidney international.

[24]  T. Depner,et al.  Assessing adequacy of hemodialysis: urea modeling. , 1994, Kidney international.

[25]  N. Levin Adequacy of dialysis. , 1994, American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation.

[26]  R. Hume,et al.  Relationship between total body water and surface area in normal and obese subjects , 1971, Journal of clinical pathology.

[27]  J Fangman,et al.  Effect of hematocrit on solute removal during high efficiency hemodialysis. , 1990, Kidney international.

[28]  A. Nissenson,et al.  Multicenter clinical validation of an on-line monitor of dialysis adequacy. , 1996, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN.