In Vitro Acoustic Characterization of Three Phospholipid Ultrasound Contrast Agents from 12 to 43 MHz

The acoustic properties of two clinical (Definity, Lantheus Medical Imaging, North Billerica, MA, USA; SonoVue, Bracco S.P.A., Milan, Italy) and one pre-clinical (MicroMarker, untargeted, Bracco, Geneva, Switzerland; VisualSonics, Toronto, ON, Canada) ultrasound contrast agent were characterized using a broadband substitution technique over the ultrasound frequency range 12–43 MHz at 20 ± 1°C. At the same number concentration, the acoustic attenuation and contrast-to-tissue ratio of the three native ultrasound contrast agents are comparable at frequencies below 30 MHz, though their size distributions and encapsulated gases and shells differ. At frequencies above 30 MHz, native MicroMarker has higher attenuation values and contrast-to-tissue ratios than native Definity and SonoVue. Decantation was found to be an effective method to alter the size distribution and concentration of native clinical microbubble populations, enabling further contrast enhancement for specific pre-clinical applications.

[1]  R. Powell,et al.  Needle size and injection rate impact microbubble contrast agent population. , 2008, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[2]  Helen Mulvana,et al.  Influence of needle gauge on in vivo ultrasound and microbubble-mediated gene transfection. , 2011, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[3]  Nico De Jong,et al.  Characterization of Definity™ ultrasound contrast agent at frequency range of 5-15 MHz. , 2011, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[4]  E. Chérin,et al.  Investigating the subharmonic response of individual phospholipid encapsulated microbubbles at high frequencies: a comparative study of five agents. , 2012, Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology.

[5]  George S. K. Wong,et al.  Speed of sound in pure water as a function of temperature , 1993 .

[6]  Yao-Sheng Tung,et al.  Microbubble-Size Dependence of Focused Ultrasound-Induced Blood–Brain Barrier Opening in Mice In Vivo , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[7]  J. Gorce,et al.  Influence of Bubble Size Distribution on the Echogenicity of Ultrasound Contrast Agents: A Study of SonoVue™ , 2000, Investigative radiology.

[8]  A. Needles,et al.  High frequency nonlinear B-scan imaging of microbubble contrast agents , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[9]  S. Homma,et al.  Effect of microbubble size on fundamental mode high frequency ultrasound imaging in mice. , 2010, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[10]  E. Chérin,et al.  Acoustic and kinetic behaviour of definity in mice exposed to high frequency ultrasound. , 2009, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[11]  M. Schneider,et al.  SonoVue, a new ultrasound contrast agent , 1999, European Radiology.

[12]  W. McDicken,et al.  In vitro acoustic characterisation of four intravenous ultrasonic contrast agents at 30 MHz. , 2002, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[13]  Xiaochen Xu,et al.  In vivo cardiac imaging of adult zebrafish using high frequency ultrasound (45-75 MHz). , 2008, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[14]  A. C. Tims,et al.  Comparisons of two encapsulating methods on the acoustic performance of a passive cylindrical array , 1993 .

[15]  F Stuart Foster,et al.  Micro-ultrasound for preclinical imaging , 2011, Interface Focus.

[16]  N. Jong,et al.  High Frequency Attenuation and Size Distribution Measurements of Definity and Manipulated Definity Populations , 2006 .

[17]  A.F.W. van der Steen,et al.  The effect of bubble size on Nonlinear Scattering from Microbubbles at high frequencies , 2003 .

[18]  W. McDicken,et al.  High frequency characterisation of commercial contrast agents , 2005, IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, 2005..

[19]  In vitro characterization of liposomes and Optison by acoustic scattering at 3.5 MHz. , 2003, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[20]  A Bouakaz,et al.  Review of shell models for contrast agent microbubbles , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[21]  B. Helfield,et al.  The effect of pre-activation vial temperature on the acoustic properties of definity , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium.

[22]  D. Khismatullin Resonance frequency of microbubbles: effect of viscosity. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  Vassilis Sboros,et al.  The Speed of Sound and Attenuation of an IEC Agar-Based Tissue-Mimicking Material for High Frequency Ultrasound Applications , 2012, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[24]  A. Bouakaz,et al.  WFUMB Safety Symposium on Echo-Contrast Agents: nature and types of ultrasound contrast agents. , 2007, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[25]  L. Hoff Acoustic properties of ultrasonic contrast agents , 1996 .

[26]  H. Ermert,et al.  A NEW HIGH FREQUENCY ULTRASOUND SKIN IMAGING SYSTEM: IMAGING PROPERTIES AND CLINICAL IN VIVO RESULTS , 2007 .

[27]  Eleanor Stride,et al.  Microbubble destruction during intravenous administration: a preliminary study. , 2009, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[28]  Paul A Dayton,et al.  Improving Sensitivity in Ultrasound Molecular Imaging by Tailoring Contrast Agent Size Distribution: In Vivo Studies , 2010, Molecular imaging.

[29]  N de Jong,et al.  Absorption and scatter of encapsulated gas filled microspheres: theoretical considerations and some measurements. , 1992, Ultrasonics.

[30]  B. Helfield,et al.  Scaling of viscoelastic shell properties of lipid encapsulated microbubbles with frequency. , 2010 .

[31]  B. Helfield,et al.  Nonlinear resonance behavior and linear shell estimates for Definity™ and MicroMarker™ assessed with acoustic microbubble spectroscopy. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[32]  Jonathan Mamou,et al.  Improved high-resolution ultrasonic imaging of the eye. , 2008, Archives of ophthalmology.

[33]  S. Rhee,et al.  High frequency (IVUS) ultrasound transducer technology - applications and challenges , 2007, 2007 Sixteenth IEEE International Symposium on the Applications of Ferroelectrics.

[34]  Jameel A Feshitan,et al.  Microbubble size isolation by differential centrifugation. , 2009, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[35]  E. Chérin,et al.  In vitro characterization of the subharmonic ultrasound signal from Definity microbubbles at high frequencies , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.