In Vitro Acoustic Characterization of Three Phospholipid Ultrasound Contrast Agents from 12 to 43 MHz
暂无分享,去创建一个
Vassilis Sboros | Carmel M. Moran | Mairead B. Butler | M. Butler | C. Moran | Chao Sun | V. Sboros | Chao Sun
[1] R. Powell,et al. Needle size and injection rate impact microbubble contrast agent population. , 2008, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.
[2] Helen Mulvana,et al. Influence of needle gauge on in vivo ultrasound and microbubble-mediated gene transfection. , 2011, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.
[3] Nico De Jong,et al. Characterization of Definity™ ultrasound contrast agent at frequency range of 5-15 MHz. , 2011, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.
[4] E. Chérin,et al. Investigating the subharmonic response of individual phospholipid encapsulated microbubbles at high frequencies: a comparative study of five agents. , 2012, Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology.
[5] George S. K. Wong,et al. Speed of sound in pure water as a function of temperature , 1993 .
[6] Yao-Sheng Tung,et al. Microbubble-Size Dependence of Focused Ultrasound-Induced Blood–Brain Barrier Opening in Mice In Vivo , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.
[7] J. Gorce,et al. Influence of Bubble Size Distribution on the Echogenicity of Ultrasound Contrast Agents: A Study of SonoVue™ , 2000, Investigative radiology.
[8] A. Needles,et al. High frequency nonlinear B-scan imaging of microbubble contrast agents , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.
[9] S. Homma,et al. Effect of microbubble size on fundamental mode high frequency ultrasound imaging in mice. , 2010, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.
[10] E. Chérin,et al. Acoustic and kinetic behaviour of definity in mice exposed to high frequency ultrasound. , 2009, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.
[11] M. Schneider,et al. SonoVue, a new ultrasound contrast agent , 1999, European Radiology.
[12] W. McDicken,et al. In vitro acoustic characterisation of four intravenous ultrasonic contrast agents at 30 MHz. , 2002, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.
[13] Xiaochen Xu,et al. In vivo cardiac imaging of adult zebrafish using high frequency ultrasound (45-75 MHz). , 2008, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.
[14] A. C. Tims,et al. Comparisons of two encapsulating methods on the acoustic performance of a passive cylindrical array , 1993 .
[15] F Stuart Foster,et al. Micro-ultrasound for preclinical imaging , 2011, Interface Focus.
[16] N. Jong,et al. High Frequency Attenuation and Size Distribution Measurements of Definity and Manipulated Definity Populations , 2006 .
[17] A.F.W. van der Steen,et al. The effect of bubble size on Nonlinear Scattering from Microbubbles at high frequencies , 2003 .
[18] W. McDicken,et al. High frequency characterisation of commercial contrast agents , 2005, IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, 2005..
[19] In vitro characterization of liposomes and Optison by acoustic scattering at 3.5 MHz. , 2003, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.
[20] A Bouakaz,et al. Review of shell models for contrast agent microbubbles , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.
[21] B. Helfield,et al. The effect of pre-activation vial temperature on the acoustic properties of definity , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium.
[22] D. Khismatullin. Resonance frequency of microbubbles: effect of viscosity. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[23] Vassilis Sboros,et al. The Speed of Sound and Attenuation of an IEC Agar-Based Tissue-Mimicking Material for High Frequency Ultrasound Applications , 2012, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.
[24] A. Bouakaz,et al. WFUMB Safety Symposium on Echo-Contrast Agents: nature and types of ultrasound contrast agents. , 2007, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.
[25] L. Hoff. Acoustic properties of ultrasonic contrast agents , 1996 .
[26] H. Ermert,et al. A NEW HIGH FREQUENCY ULTRASOUND SKIN IMAGING SYSTEM: IMAGING PROPERTIES AND CLINICAL IN VIVO RESULTS , 2007 .
[27] Eleanor Stride,et al. Microbubble destruction during intravenous administration: a preliminary study. , 2009, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.
[28] Paul A Dayton,et al. Improving Sensitivity in Ultrasound Molecular Imaging by Tailoring Contrast Agent Size Distribution: In Vivo Studies , 2010, Molecular imaging.
[29] N de Jong,et al. Absorption and scatter of encapsulated gas filled microspheres: theoretical considerations and some measurements. , 1992, Ultrasonics.
[30] B. Helfield,et al. Scaling of viscoelastic shell properties of lipid encapsulated microbubbles with frequency. , 2010 .
[31] B. Helfield,et al. Nonlinear resonance behavior and linear shell estimates for Definity™ and MicroMarker™ assessed with acoustic microbubble spectroscopy. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[32] Jonathan Mamou,et al. Improved high-resolution ultrasonic imaging of the eye. , 2008, Archives of ophthalmology.
[33] S. Rhee,et al. High frequency (IVUS) ultrasound transducer technology - applications and challenges , 2007, 2007 Sixteenth IEEE International Symposium on the Applications of Ferroelectrics.
[34] Jameel A Feshitan,et al. Microbubble size isolation by differential centrifugation. , 2009, Journal of colloid and interface science.
[35] E. Chérin,et al. In vitro characterization of the subharmonic ultrasound signal from Definity microbubbles at high frequencies , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.