Common solar wind drivers behind magnetic storm–magnetospheric substorm dependency

The dynamical relationship between magnetic storms and magnetospheric substorms is one of the most controversial issues of contemporary space research. Here, we address this issue through a causal inference approach to two corresponding indices in conjunction with several relevant solar wind variables. We find that the vertical component of the interplanetary magnetic field is the strongest and common driver of both storms and substorms. Further, our results suggest, at least based on the analyzed indices, that there is no statistical evidence for a direct or indirect dependency between substorms and storms and their statistical association can be explained by the common solar drivers. Given the powerful statistical tests we performed (by simultaneously taking into account time series of indices and solar wind variables), a physical mechanism through which substorms directly or indirectly drive storms or vice versa is, therefore, unlikely.

[1]  Manuel Grande,et al.  Current understanding of magnetic storms: storm-substorm relationships , 1998 .

[2]  Theodore A. Fritz,et al.  Role of substorm-associated impulsive electric fields in the ring current development during storms , 2005 .

[3]  Y. Kamide.  Is Substorm Occurrence a Necessary Condition for a Magnetic Storm , 1992 .

[4]  B. Mauk,et al.  The role of small‐scale ion injections in the buildup of Earth's ring current pressure: Van Allen Probes observations of the 17 March 2013 storm , 2014 .

[5]  T. Pulkkinen,et al.  Solar wind—magnetosphere coupling: A review of recent results , 2007 .

[6]  T. Mukai,et al.  Effects of the fast plasma sheet flow on the geosynchronous magnetic configuration : Geotail and GOES coordinated study , 2006 .

[7]  Georgios Balasis,et al.  From pre-storm activity to magnetic storms: A transition described in terms of fractal dynamics , 2006 .

[8]  L. Lanzerotti,et al.  Storm time dynamics of ring current protons: Implications for the long‐term energy budget in the inner magnetosphere , 2015 .

[9]  B Hellwig,et al.  On Studentising and Blocklength Selection for the Bootstrap on Time Series , 2005, Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift.

[10]  D. Vassiliadis,et al.  Intense space storms: Critical issues and open disputes , 2003 .

[11]  T. Moore,et al.  Modeling of inner plasma sheet and ring current during substorms , 1999 .

[12]  Jürgen Kurths,et al.  Escaping the curse of dimensionality in estimating multivariate transfer entropy. , 2012, Physical review letters.

[13]  Jürgen Kurths,et al.  Statistical Mechanics and Information-Theoretic Perspectives on Complexity in the Earth System , 2013, Entropy.

[14]  Edward J. Smith,et al.  The nonlinear response of AE to the IMF BS driver: A spectral break at 5 hours , 1990 .

[15]  P. Newell,et al.  SuperMAG‐based partial ring current indices , 2012 .

[16]  H. W. Kroehl,et al.  What is a geomagnetic storm , 1994 .

[17]  Schreiber,et al.  Measuring information transfer , 2000, Physical review letters.

[18]  British Antarctic Survey,et al.  Scaling of solar wind ϵ and the AU, AL and AE indices as seen by WIND , 2002, physics/0208021.

[19]  N. Tsyganenko.  Data-based modelling of the Earth's dynamic magnetosphere: a review , 2013 .

[20]  R. Dahlhaus.  Graphical interaction models for multivariate time series1 , 2000 .

[21]  C. Russell,et al.  Multipoint analysis of a bursty bulk flow event on April 11, 1985 , 1996 .

[22]  Dimitris Vassiliadis,et al.  Systems theory for geospace plasma dynamics , 2006 .

[23]  J. Borovsky,et al.  Multistep Dst development and ring current composition changes during the 4–6 June 1991 magnetic storm , 2002 .

[24]  Daniel N. Baker,et al.  The organized nonlinear dynamics of the magnetosphere , 1996 .

[25]  S. Frenzel,et al.  Partial mutual information for coupling analysis of multivariate time series. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[26]  Jürgen Kurths,et al.  Identifying causal gateways and mediators in complex spatio-temporal systems , 2015, Nature Communications.

[27]  I. Daglis,et al.  The Role of Substorms in Storm‐Time Particle Acceleration , 2013 .

[28]  D. Baker,et al.  IMF control of geomagnetic activity , 1988 .

[29]  M. Friel,et al.  Substorm behavior of the auroral electrojet indices , 2004 .

[30]  Dino Sejdinovic,et al.  Detecting and quantifying causal associations in large nonlinear time series datasets , 2017, Science Advances.

[31]  Daniel N. Baker,et al.  Magnetospheric Impulse Response for Many Levels of Geomagnetic Activity , 1985 .

[32]  Jürgen Kurths,et al.  Quantifying Causal Coupling Strength: A Lag-specific Measure For Multivariate Time Series Related To Transfer Entropy , 2012, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[33]  S. Chapman,et al.  The magnetic field of a model radiation belt, numerically computed , 1961 .

[34]  Enrico Camporeale,et al.  Information theoretical approach to discovering solar wind drivers of the outer radiation belt , 2016 .

[35]  Georgios Balasis,et al.  Investigating dynamical complexity in the magnetosphere using various entropy measures , 2009 .

[36]  S. Wing,et al.  Transfer entropy and cumulant-based cost as measures of nonlinear causal relationships in space plasmas: applications to Dst , 2018, Annales Geophysicae.

[37]  M. Eichler.  Graphical modelling of multivariate time series , 2006, math/0610654.

[38]  Jens Timmer,et al.  Block-bootstrapping for noisy data , 2013, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[39]  D. Baker,et al.  The nonlinearity of models of the vB South‐AL coupling , 1996 .

[40]  A. Kraskov,et al.  Estimating mutual information. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[41]  A. Sharma,et al.  The Storm‐Substorm Relationship: Current Understanding and Outlook , 2013 .

[42]  Jürgen Kurths,et al.  Optimal model-free prediction from multivariate time series. , 2015, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[43]  Jakob Runge,et al.  Quantifying information transfer and mediation along causal pathways in complex systems. , 2015, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[44]  K. Shiokawa,et al.  “Fine structure” of the storm-substorm relationship: Ion injections during DST decrease , 2000 .

[45]  Jakob Runge,et al.  Quantifying the Strength and Delay of Climatic Interactions: The Ambiguities of Cross Correlation and a Novel Measure Based on Graphical Models , 2014 .

[46]  Thomas M. Cover,et al.  Elements of Information Theory , 2005 .

[47]  G. Consolini,et al.  Multifractal structure of auroral electrojet index data. , 1996, Physical review letters.

[48]  Robert L. McPherron,et al.  Decay of the Dst field of geomagnetic disturbance after substorm onset and its implication to storm-substorm relation , 1996 .

[49]  Massimo Materassi,et al.  An information theory approach to the storm-substorm relationship , 2011 .

[50]  J Runge,et al.  Causal network reconstruction from time series: From theoretical assumptions to practical estimation. , 2018, Chaos.