Representative elementary volume analysis of porous media using X-ray computed tomography

Abstract The concept of representative elementary volume (REV) is critical to understand and predict the behaviour of effective parameters of complex heterogeneous media (e.g., soils) in a multiscale manner. Porosity is commonly used to define the REV of a given sample. In this paper we investigated whether the use of a REV for porosity can be used as a REV for other parameters such as particle size distribution, local void ratio and coordination number. X-ray computed tomography was used to obtain 3D images (i.e., volumes) of natural sand systems with different particle size distributions. 3D volumes of four different systems were obtained and a REV analysis was performed for these parameters utilizing robust 3D algorithms. Findings revealed that the REVmin for porosity may not be adequate to be considered as a REV for parameters such as particle size distribution, local void ratio and coordination number. The REVmin for these parameters was observed to be larger than the REVmin for porosity. Heterogeneity of the systems was found to be an important factor to determine the REV for the parameters analyzed in this paper. The REV analysis revealed that as the uniformity coefficient increased, a larger volume was required to obtain the REVmin for the distribution of particle sizes and coordination number whereas a smaller volume was required to obtain the REVmin for local void ratio. Therefore, determination of the REV for parameters described in this paper or any microscale parameter of concern should not be derived based on REV for porosity and should be determined based on their distributions over different volumes.

[1]  Antonio Coniglio,et al.  Frustration and slow dynamics of granular packings , 1997 .

[2]  Fusao Oka,et al.  Dispersion and wave propagation in discrete and continuous models for granular materials , 1996 .

[3]  S. Edwards,et al.  Compactivity and transmission of stress in granular materials. , 1999, Chaos.

[4]  R. Protz,et al.  The representative elementary area (REA) in studies of quantitative soil micromorphology , 1999 .

[5]  J. Bear,et al.  Introduction to Modeling of Transport Phenomena in Porous Media , 1990 .

[6]  Q. Zheng,et al.  A Quantitative study of minimum sizes of representative volume elements of cubic polycrystals—numerical experiments , 2002 .

[7]  Norman A. Fleck,et al.  Numerical analysis of strain gradient effects in periodic media , 2001 .

[8]  Fabrice Barbe,et al.  Analysis by x-ray microtomography of a granular packing undergoing compaction. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[9]  Fpt Frank Baaijens,et al.  An approach to micro-macro modeling of heterogeneous materials , 2001 .

[10]  R. Al-Raoush,et al.  Distribution of local void ratio in porous media systems from 3D X-ray microtomography images , 2006 .

[11]  W. B. Lindquist,et al.  Medial axis analysis of void structure in three-dimensional tomographic images of porous media , 1996 .

[12]  Riyadh I. Al-Raoush,et al.  Simulation of random packing of polydisperse particles , 2007 .

[13]  Richard Webster,et al.  Is soil variation random , 2000 .

[14]  Rafael C. González,et al.  Digital image processing using MATLAB , 2006 .

[15]  J. Chaboche,et al.  FE2 multiscale approach for modelling the elastoviscoplastic behaviour of long fibre SiC/Ti composite materials , 2000 .

[16]  W. B. Lindquist,et al.  Investigating 3D geometry of porous media from high resolution images , 1999 .

[17]  J. Crawford,et al.  Effect of sampling volume on the measurement of soil physical properties: simulation with x-ray tomography data , 2002 .

[18]  W. Jury,et al.  A theoretical study of the estimation of the correlation scale in spatially variable fields: 2. Nonstationary fields , 1987 .

[19]  T Aste,et al.  Geometrical structure of disordered sphere packings. , 2005, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[20]  W. Brent Lindquist,et al.  Image Thresholding by Indicator Kriging , 1999, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[21]  A. Gokhale,et al.  Representative volume element for non-uniform micro-structure , 2002 .

[22]  Jan W. Hopmans,et al.  Determination of phase-volume fractions from tomographic measurements in two-phase systems , 1999 .

[23]  Glenn O. Brown,et al.  Evaluation of laboratory dolomite core sample size using representative elementary volume concepts , 2000 .

[24]  Martin Ostoja-Starzewski,et al.  Scale effects in plasticity of random media: status and challenges , 2005 .

[25]  Balasingam Muhunthan,et al.  Representative Elementary Volume Analysis of Sands Using X-Ray Computed Tomography , 2007 .

[26]  D. Jeulin,et al.  Determination of the size of the representative volume element for random composites: statistical and numerical approach , 2003 .

[27]  Ching S. Chang,et al.  Second-gradient constitutive theory for granular material with random packing structure , 1995 .

[28]  Riyadh I. Al-Raoush,et al.  Microstructure characterization of granular materials , 2007 .

[29]  Samuel Graham,et al.  Representative volumes of materials based on microstructural statistics , 2003 .

[30]  V. Kouznetsova,et al.  Multi‐scale constitutive modelling of heterogeneous materials with a gradient‐enhanced computational homogenization scheme , 2002 .