Usefulness of diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of prostate transition-zone cancer

Background: Conventional T2-weighted (T2-WI) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has poor sensitivity for prostate transition-zone (TZ) cancer detection. Purpose: To retrospectively evaluate the clinical value of diffusion-weighted MRI (DW-MRI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) in combination with T2-WI for the diagnosis of TZ cancer. Material and Methods: Twenty-six TZ cancers in 23 patients with at least one tumor (tumor size >10 mm) located predominantly in the TZ were included in the study. Sixteen peripheral-zone (PZ) cancers in 12 patients with PZ cancer but without TZ cancer (control group) were selected by step-section pathologic maps. All patients underwent MRI and radical prostatectomy. MRI was obtained by a 1.5T superconducting system with a phased-array coil. Imaging sequences were T2-WI with fat saturation (FST2-WI), DW-MRI (single-shot echoplanar image, b=0 and 1000 s/mm2, apparent diffusion coefficient [ADC] map findings), and DCE-MRI (3D fast spoiled gradient recalled [SPGR], contrast medium [0.2 mmol/kg], total injection time 5 s, image acquisition 30, 60, and 90 s). Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive predictive value (PPV) for the diagnosis of TZ cancer were evaluated in four protocols: A) FST2-WI alone, B) FST2-WI plus DW-MRI, C) FST2-WI plus DCE-MRI, D) FST2-WI plus DW-MRI plus DCE-MRI. Results: Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and PPV in protocol A (FST2-WI alone) were 61.5%, 68.8%, 64.3%, and 76.2%, respectively. FST2-WI plus DW-MRI (protocol B) improved the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and PPV. In FST2-WI plus DW-MRI plus DCE-MRI (protocol D), the number of true-negative lesions increased and false-positive lesions decreased, and the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and PPV were 69.2%, 93.8%, 78.6%, and 94.7%, respectively. There was a significant difference between protocols A and D (P<0.05). Conclusion: Adding DW-MRI to FST2-WI in the diagnosis of prostate TZ cancer increased the diagnostic accuracy. The addition of DCE-MRI may be an option to improve the specificity and PPV of diagnosing TZ cancer with FST2-WI and DW-MRI.

[1]  村本 聡 Differentiation of prostate cancer from benign prostate hypertrophy using dual-echo dynamic contrast MR imaging , 2002 .

[2]  H. Hricak,et al.  Prostate cancer imaging , 2008, Acta radiologica.

[3]  Yuri Kitamura,et al.  Conventional MRI capabilities in the diagnosis of prostate cancer in the transition zone. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[4]  J Kurhanewicz,et al.  Dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI in normal and abnormal prostate tissues as defined by biopsy, MRI, and 3D MRSI , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[5]  G P Liney,et al.  Differentiation of prostatic carcinoma and benign prostatic hyperplasia: Correlation between dynamic Gd‐DTPA‐enhanced MR imaging and histopathology , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[6]  Peter Gibbs,et al.  Comparison of quantitative T2 mapping and diffusion‐weighted imaging in the normal and pathologic prostate , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[7]  Anwar R. Padhani,et al.  Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI of Prostate Cancer , 2005 .

[8]  Evis Sala,et al.  Transition zone prostate cancers: features, detection, localization, and staging at endorectal MR imaging. , 2006, Radiology.

[9]  Hiroshi Honda,et al.  Usefulness of apparent diffusion coefficient map in diagnosing prostate carcinoma: Correlation with stepwise histopathology , 2008, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[10]  Jelle O. Barentsz,et al.  Local staging of prostate cancer using magnetic resonance imaging: a meta-analysis , 2002, European Radiology.

[11]  K. Hosseinzadeh,et al.  Endorectal diffusion‐weighted imaging in prostate cancer to differentiate malignant and benign peripheral zone tissue , 2004, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[12]  H. Shinmoto,et al.  Prostate cancer screening: The clinical value of diffusion‐weighted imaging and dynamic MR imaging in combination with T2‐weighted imaging , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[13]  B. Issa,et al.  In vivo measurement of the apparent diffusion coefficient in normal and malignant prostatic tissues using echo‐planar imaging , 2002, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[14]  D. LeBihan,et al.  Molecular diffusion nuclear magnetic resonance imaging. , 1991 .

[15]  N. deSouza,et al.  MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING IN PROSTATE CANCER : VALUE OF APPARENT DIFFUSION COEFFICIENTS FOR IDENTIFYING MALIGNANT NODULES , 2010 .

[16]  A Heerschap,et al.  Fast dynamic gadolinium‐enhanced MR imaging of urinary bladder and prostate cancer , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[17]  N. Sadato,et al.  Differentiation of prostate cancer from benign prostate hypertrophy using dual-echo dynamic contrast MR imaging. , 2002, European journal of radiology.

[18]  J. McNeal,et al.  Limitations of transition zone needle biopsy findings in the prediction of transition zone cancer and tissue composition of benign nodular hyperplasia. , 1996, Urology.

[19]  H. Kundel,et al.  Measurement of observer agreement. , 2003, Radiology.

[20]  H. Hricak,et al.  Imaging of prostate cancer. , 2007, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[21]  Vladimir Bilim,et al.  Dynamic contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE‐MRI) is a useful modality for the precise detection and staging of early prostate cancer , 2005, The Prostate.

[22]  Y. Yamashita,et al.  The value of dynamic MR imaging for hypointensity lesions of the peripheral zone of the prostate. , 1998, Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society.

[23]  Z. Hall Cancer , 1906, The Hospital.

[24]  S. Kyriazi,et al.  Evaluation of the potential of diffusion-weighted imaging in prostate cancer detection , 2007, Acta radiologica.

[25]  William Wells,et al.  Detection of prostate cancer by integration of line-scan diffusion, T2-mapping and T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging; a multichannel statistical classifier. , 2003, Medical physics.

[26]  P. Grenier,et al.  MR imaging of intravoxel incoherent motions: application to diffusion and perfusion in neurologic disorders. , 1986, Radiology.

[27]  D. Le Bihan Molecular diffusion nuclear magnetic resonance imaging. , 1991, Magnetic resonance quarterly.